The pointer-to-member operators .*
and ->*
are used to obtain an object or a function as though it were a member of an underlying object. For instance, the following are functionally equivalent ways to call the member function f()
on the object o
.
struct S { void f() {} }; void func() { S o; void (S::*pm)() = &S::f; o.f(); (o.*pm)(); }
The call of the form o.f()
uses class member access at compile time to look up the address of the function S::f()
on the object o
. The call of the form (o.*pm)()
uses the pointer-to-member operator .*
to call the function at the address specified by pm
. In both cases, the object o
is the implicit this
object within the member function S::f()
.
The C++ Standard, [expr.mptr.oper], paragraph 4 [ISO/IEC 14882-2014], states the following:
Abbreviating pm-expression.*cast-expression as
E1.*E2
,E1
is called the object expression. If the dynamic type ofE1
does not contain the member to whichE2
refers, the behavior is undefined.
A pointer-to-member expression of the form E1->*E2
is converted to its equivalent form, (*(E1)).*E2
, so use of pointer-to-member expressions of either form behave equivalently in terms of undefined behavior.
Further, the C++ Standard, [expr.mptr.oper], paragraph 6, in part, states the following:
If the second operand is the null pointer to member value, the behavior is undefined.
Do not use a pointer-to-member expression where the dynamic type of the first operand does not contain the member to which the second operand refers, including the use of a null pointer-to-member value as the second operand.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a pointer-to-member object is obtained from D::g
but is then upcast to be a B::*
. When called on an object whose dynamic type is D
, the pointer-to-member call is well defined. However, the dynamic type of the underlying object is B
, which results in undefined behavior.
struct B { virtual ~B() = default; }; struct D : B { virtual ~D() = default; virtual void g() { /* ... */ } }; void f() { B *b = new B; // ... void (B::*gptr)() = static_cast<void(B::*)()>(&D::g); (b->*gptr)(); delete b; }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the upcast is removed, rendering the initial code ill-formed and emphasizing the underlying problem that B::g()
does not exist. This compliant solution assumes that the programmer's intention was to use the correct dynamic type for the underlying object.
struct B { virtual ~B() = default; }; struct D : B { virtual ~D() = default; virtual void g() { /* ... */ } }; void f() { B *b = new D; // Corrected the dynamic object type. // ... void (D::*gptr)() = &D::g; // Moved static_cast to the next line. (static_cast<D *>(b)->*gptr)(); delete b; }
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a null pointer-to-member value is passed as the second operand to a pointer-to-member expression, resulting in undefined behavior.
struct B { virtual ~B() = default; }; struct D : B { virtual ~D() = default; virtual void g() { /* ... */ } }; static void (D::*gptr)(); // Not explicitly initialized, defaults to nullptr. void call_memptr(D *ptr) { (ptr->*gptr)(); } void f() { D *d = new D; call_memptr(d); delete d; }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, gptr
is properly initialized to a valid pointer-to-member value instead of to the default value of nullptr
.
struct B { virtual ~B() = default; }; struct D : B { virtual ~D() = default; virtual void g() { /* ... */ } }; static void (D::*gptr)() = &D::g; // Explicitly initialized. void call_memptr(D *ptr) { (ptr->*gptr)(); } void f() { D *d = new D; call_memptr(d); delete d; }
Risk Assessment
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOP55-CPP | High | Probable | High | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Parasoft C/C++test | 9.5 | BD-PB-NP | |
Parasoft Insure++ | Runtime detection | ||
PRQA QA-C | 4.1 | 2810, 2811, 2812, 2813, 2814 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for other vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
This rule is a subset of EXP34-C. Do not dereference null pointers.
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 14882-2014] | Subclause 5.5, "Pointer-to-Member Operators" |