Accessing memory once it is freed may corrupt the data structures used to manage the heap. References to memory that has been deallocated are referred to as dangling pointers. Accessing a dangling pointer can result in exploitable vulnerabilities.
When memory is freed, its contents may remain intact and accessible because it is at the memory manager's discretion when to reallocate or recycle the freed chunk. The data at the freed location may appear valid. However, this can change unexpectedly, leading to unintended program behavior. As a result, it is necessary to guarantee that memory is not written to or read from once it is freed.
Noncompliant Code Example
This example from Kernighan and Ritchie [[Kernighan 88]] shows both the incorrect and correct techniques for deleting items from a linked list. The incorrect solution, clearly marked as wrong in the book, is bad because p
is freed before the p->next
is executed, so p->next
reads memory that has already been freed.
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = p->next) free(p);
Compliant Solution
Kernighan and Ritchie also show the correct solution. To correct this error, a reference to p->next
is stored in q
before freeing p
.
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = q) { q = p->next; free(p); } head = NULL;
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, buff
is written to after it has been freed. These vulnerabilities can be easily exploited to run arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process and are seldom this obvious. Typically, allocations and frees are far removed, making it difficult to recognize and diagnose these problems.
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) { char *buff; buff = new char[BUFSIZ]; /* ... */ delete[] buff; /* ... */ strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFSIZ-1); }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution do not free the memory until it is no longer required.
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) { char *buff; buff = new char[BUFSIZ]; /* ... */ strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFSIZ-1); /* ... */ delete[] buff; buff = NULL; }
Risk Assessment
Reading memory that has already been freed can lead to abnormal program termination and denial-of-service attacks. Writing memory that has already been freed can lead to the execution of arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM30-CPP |
high |
likely |
medium |
P18 |
L1 |
Automated Detection
The LDRA tool suite Version 7.6.0 can detect violations of this rule.
Fortify SCA Version 5.0 can detect violations of this rule.
Splint Version 3.1.1 can detect violations of this rule.
Compass/ROSE can detect violations of the rule.
Klocwork Version 8.0.4.16 can detect violations of this rule with the UFM.DEREF.MIGHT, UFM.DEREF.MUST, UFM.FFM.MIGHT, UFM.FFM.MUST, UFM.PARAMPASS.MIGHT, UFM.PARAMPASS.MUST, UFM.RETURN.MIGHT, UFM.RETURN.MUST, UFM.USE.MIGHT, and UFM.USE.MUST checkers.
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Other Languages
This rule appears in the C Secure Coding Standard as MEM30-C. Do not access freed memory.
References
[[Henricson 97]] Rule 8.3 Do not access a pointer or reference to a deleted object
[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999]] Section 7.20.3.2, "The free
function"
[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]] "DCM Dangling references to stack frames" and "XYK Dangling Reference to Heap"
[[Kernighan 88]] Section 7.8.5, "Storage Management"
[[MISRA 04]] Rule 17.6
[[MITRE 07]] CWE ID 416, "Use After Free"
[[OWASP Freed Memory]]
[[Seacord 05a]] Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management"
[[Viega 05]] Section 5.2.19, "Using freed memory"
MEM11-CPP. Do not use volatile as a synchronization primitive 08. Memory Management (MEM) MEM31-CPP. Free dynamically allocated memory exactly once