You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 39 Next »

Threads always preserve class invariants when they are allowed to exit normally. Programmers often try to forcefully terminate threads when they believe that the task is accomplished, the request has been canceled or the program needs to quickly shutdown.

A few thread APIs were introduced to facilitate thread suspension, resumption and termination but were later deprecated due to inherent design weaknesses. The Thread.stop() method is one example. It throws a ThreadDeath exception to stop the thread. Two cases arise:

  • If ThreadDeath is left uncaught, it allows the execution of a finally block which performs the usual cleanup operations. Use of the Thread.stop() method is highly inadvisable because of two reasons. First, no particular thread can be forcefully stopped because an arbitrary thread can catch the thrown ThreadDeath exception and simply choose to ignore it. Second, stopping threads abruptly results in the release of all the associated monitors, violating the guarantees provided by the critical sections. Moreover, the objects end up in an inconsistent state, nondeterministic behavior being a typical outcome.
  • As a remediation measure, catching the ThreadDeath exception on the other hand can itself ensnarl multithreaded code. For one, the exception can be thrown anywhere, making it difficult to trace and effectively recover from the exceptional condition. Also, there is nothing stopping a thread from throwing another ThreadDeath exception while recovery is in progress.

Noncompliant Code Example (Deprecated Thread.stop())

This noncompliant code example shows a thread that fills a vector with strings. The thread is shut down after a fixed period of time time.

public class Container implements Runnable {
  private final Vector<String> vector = new Vector<String>();
  public Vector<String> getVector() {
    return vector;
  }
  
  public void run() {
    String string = null;
    BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
    do {
      System.out.println("Enter another string");
      try {
        string = in.readLine();
      } catch (IOException e) {
        // Forward to handler
      }
      vector.add(string);
    } while (!"END".equals(string));
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
    Container c = new Container();
    Thread thread = new Thread(c);
    thread.start();
    Thread.sleep(5000);
    thread.stop();
  }
}

Since vector is thread-safe, it is only accessible to this program while in a consistent state. That is, the Vector.size() method always reflects the true number of elements in the vector. When a new element is added to the vector, it adjusts its internal data and its internal data is temporarily inconsistent. But the vector uses its own intrinsic lock to prevent other threads from accessing it while its state is inconsistent.

However, the Thread.stop() method causes the thread to stop what it is doing and throw a ThreadDeath object, and also to release all locks [[API 06]]. If the thread is currently adding a new string to the vector when it gets stopped, then the vector may become visible while in an inconsistent state. This might mean, for instance, that Vector.size() is 3 while the vector actually only contains 2 elements.

Compliant Solution (volatile flag)

This compliant example stops the thread by making use of a volatile flag. An accessor method shutdown() is used to set the flag to true, after which the thread can start the cancellation process.

public class Container implements Runnable {
  private final Vector<String> vector = new Vector<String>();
  
  private volatile boolean done = false;
  
  public Vector<String> getVector() {
    return vector;
  }
  
  public void shutdown() {
	  done = true;
  }

  public void run() {
    String string = null;
    BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
    do {
      System.out.println("Enter another string");
      try {
        string = in.readLine();
      } catch (IOException e) {
        // Forward to handler
      }
      vector.add(string);
    } while (!done && !"END".equals(string));
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
    Container c = new Container();
    Thread thread = new Thread(c);
    thread.start();
    Thread.sleep(5000);
    c.shutdown();
    return;
  }
}

Compliant Solution (Interruptible)

This compliant example stops the thread by making use of a volatile flag. An accessor method shutdown() is used to set the flag to true, after which the thread can start the cancellation process.

public class Container implements Runnable {
  private final Vector<String> vector = new Vector<String>();
  
  public Vector<String> getVector() {
  	return vector;
  }

  public void run() {
    String string = null;
    BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
    do {
      System.out.println("Enter another string");
      try {
        string = in.readLine();
      } catch (IOException e) {
        // Forward to handler
      }
      vector.add(string);
    } while (!Thread.interrupted() && !"END".equals(string));
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
    Container c = new Container();
    Thread thread = new Thread(c);
    thread.start();
    Thread.sleep(5000);
    thread.interrupt();
  }
}

Compliant Solution (RuntimePermission stopThread)

Remove the default permission java.lang.RuntimePermission stopThread from the security policy file to deny the Thread.stop() invoking code, the required privileges.

Noncompliant Code Example (blocking IO)

This noncompliant code example uses the advice suggested in the previous compliant solution. However, this does not help in terminating the thread because it is blocked on some network IO as a consequence of using the readLine() method.

class StopSocket extends Thread {
  private Socket s;
  private volatile boolean done = false;
  
  public void run() { 
    while(!done) {
      try {
        s = new Socket("somehost", 25);
        BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s.getInputStream()));
        String s = null;
        while((s = br.readLine()) != null) { 
          // Blocks until end of stream (null)
        }
      } catch (IOException ie) { 
          // Forward to handler
      } finally {
          done = true;
      }
    }
  }  

  public void shutdown() throws IOException {
    done = true;
  }
}

class Controller {
  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, IOException {
     StopSocket ss = new StopSocket();
     Thread t = new Thread(ss);
     t.start();
     Thread.sleep(1000); 
     ss.shutdown();
  }
}

A Socket connection is not affected by the InterruptedException that results with the use of the Thread.interrupt() method. The boolean flag solution does not work in such cases.

Compliant Solution (close socket connection)

This compliant solution closes the socket connection, both using the shutdown() method as well as the finally block. As a result, the thread is bound to stop due to a SocketException. Note that there is no way to keep the connection alive if the thread is to be cleanly halted immediately.

class StopSocket extends Thread {
  private Socket s;
 
  public void run() { 
    try {
      s = new Socket("somehost", 25);
      BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s.getInputStream()));
      String s = null;
      while((s = br.readLine()) != null) { 
        // Blocks until end of stream (null)
      }
    } catch (IOException ie) { 
        // Handle the exception 
    } finally {
        try {
          if(s != null)
            s.close();
        } catch (IOException e) { /* Forward to handler */ }
    }
  }

  public void shutdown() throws IOException {
    if(s != null)
      s.close();
  }
}

class Controller {
  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, IOException {
    StopSocket ss = new StopSocket();
    Thread t = new Thread(ss);
    t.start();
    Thread.sleep(1000); 
    ss.shutdown();
  }
}

A boolean flag can be used (as described earlier) if additional clean-up operations need to be performed.

Compliant Solution (2) (interruptible channel)

This compliant solution uses an interruptible channel, SocketChannel instead of a Socket connection. If the thread performing the network IO is interrupted using the Thread.interrupt() method, for instance, while reading the data, the thread receives a ClosedByInterruptException and the channel is closed immediately. The thread's interrupt status is also set.

class StopSocket extends Thread {
  private volatile boolean done = false;
  public void run() { 
    while(!done) {
      try {
    	InetSocketAddress addr = new InetSocketAddress("somehost", 25);
        SocketChannel sc = SocketChannel.open(addr);
        ByteBuffer buf = ByteBuffer.allocate(1024);
        sc.read(buf);
        // ...
      } catch (IOException ie) {  
          // Handle the exception
      } finally {
          done = true;
      }
    }
  }  

  public void shutdown() throws IOException {
    done = true;
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Trying to force thread shutdown can result in inconsistent object state and corrupt the object. Critical resources may also leak if cleanup operations are not carried out as required.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

CON13- J

low

probable

medium

P4

L3

Automated Detection

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

[[API 06]] Class Thread, method stop
[[Darwin 04]] 24.3 Stopping a Thread
[[JDK7 08]] Concurrency Utilities, More information: Java Thread Primitive Deprecation
[[JPL 06]] 14.12.1. Don't stop and 23.3.3. Shutdown Strategies
[[JavaThreads 04]] 2.4 Two Approaches to Stopping a Thread


CON12-J. Avoid deadlock by requesting and releasing locks in the same order      11. Concurrency (CON)      VOID CON14-J. Ensure atomicity of 64-bit operations

  • No labels