You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 47 Next »

Once an object of a particular class has been serialized, future refactoring of the class's code often becomes problematic. Specifically, existing serialized forms (encoded representations) become part of the object's published API and must be supported for an indefinite period. This can be troublesome from a security perspective; not only does it promote dead code, it also forces the provider to maintain a compatible code base for the lifetime of their products.

Classes that implement Serializable without overriding its functionality are said to be using the default serialized form. In the event the class changes, byte streams produced by users of old versions of the class become incompatible with the new implementation. Programs must maintain serialization compatibility during class evolution. An acceptable approach is the use of a custom serialized form, which relieves the implementer of the necessity to maintain the original serialized form and the corresponding version of the class in addition to the newly evolved version.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example implements a GameWeapon class with a serializable field called numOfWeapons and uses the default serialization form. Any changes to the internal representation of the class can break the existing serialized form.

class GameWeapon implements Serializable {
  int numOfWeapons = 10;
	    
  public String toString() {
    return String.valueOf(numOfWeapons);
  }
}

Because this class does not provide a serialVersionUID, the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) assigns it one using implementation-defined methods. If the class definition changes, the serialVersionUID is also likely to change. Consequently, the JVM will refuse to associate the serialized form of an object with the class definition when the version IDs are different.

Compliant Solution (serialVersionUID)

In this solution, the class has an explicit serialVersionUID that contains a number unique to this version of the class. The JVM will make a good-faith effort to deserialize any serialized object with the same class name and version ID.

class GameWeapon implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 24L;

  int numOfWeapons = 10;
	    
  public String toString() {
    return String.valueOf(numOfWeapons);
  }
}

Compliant Solution (serialPersistentFields)

Ideally, implement Serializable only for stable classes. One way to maintain the original serialized form and allow the class to evolve is to use custom serialization with the help of serialPersistentFields. The static and transient qualifiers specify which fields should not be serialized, whereas the serialPersistentFields field specifies which fields should be serialized. It also relieves the class from defining the serializable field within the class implementation, decoupling the current implementation from the overall logic. New fields can easily be added without breaking compatibility across releases.

class WeaponStore implements Serializable {
  int numOfWeapons = 10; // Total number of weapons
}

public class GameWeapon implements Serializable {
  WeaponStore ws = new WeaponStore();
  private static final ObjectStreamField[] serialPersistentFields
      = {new ObjectStreamField("ws", WeaponStore.class)};

  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream ois) throws IOException {
    try {
      ObjectInputStream.GetField gf = ois.readFields();
      this.ws = (WeaponStore) gf.get("ws", ws);
    } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { /* Forward to handler */ }
  }
	 
  private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream oos) throws IOException {
    ObjectOutputStream.PutField pf = oos.putFields();
    pf.put("ws", ws);
    oos.writeFields();
  }
	 
  public String toString() {
    return String.valueOf(ws);
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Failure to provide a consistent serialization mechanism across releases can limit the extensibility of classes. If classes are extended, compatibility issues may result.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

SER00-J

low

probable

high

P2

L3

Automated Detection

Automated detection of classes that use the default serialized form is straightforward.

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE

CWE-589. Call to non-ubiquitous API

Bibliography

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="d3cb6b39-63bd-4348-ac8e-425161a8694f"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[API 2006

AA. Bibliography#API 06]]

 

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="6991090d-b908-4dbf-ab47-f7e9643e2486"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Bloch 2008

AA. Bibliography#Bloch 08]]

Item 74, Implement serialization judiciously

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="167769c6-005d-4b61-b2c7-ceac8ee95341"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Harold 2006

AA. Bibliography#Harold 06]]

13.7.5, serialPersistentFields

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="63586417-11c3-465e-bb75-f1af9f1fda11"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Sun 2006

AA. Bibliography#Sun 06]]

Serialization Specification, 1.5, Defining Serializable Fields for a Class, and 1.7, Accessing Serializable Fields of a Class

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>


13. Serialization (SER)      13. Serialization (SER)      

  • No labels