The permission java.security.AllPermission
implies all other permissions, thus granting java.security.AllPermission
indeed grants all possible permissions to code. This facility was included to reduce the burden of managing a multitude of permissions during routine testing, as well as to use when a body of code is completely trusted. Code is typically granted AllPermission
via the security policy file; it is also possible to programmatically associate AllPermission
with a ProtectionDomain
. This permission is dangerous in production environments; never grant AllPermission
to untrusted code.
Noncompliant Code Example (Security Policy File)
This noncompliant example grants AllPermission
to the klib
library.
// Grant the klib library AllPermission grant codebase "file:${klib.home}/j2se/home/klib.jar" { permission java.security.AllPermission; };
The permission itself is specified in the security policy file used by the security manager. Program code can obtain a permission object by subclassing the java.security.Permission
class or any of its subclasses (for examle, BasicPermission
). The code can use the resulting object to grant AllPermission
to a ProtectionDomain
. This is bad practice.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution shows a policy file that can be used to enforce fine-grained permissions.
grant codeBase "file:${klib.home}/j2se/home/klib.jar", signedBy "Admin" { permission java.io.FilePermission "/tmp/*", "read"; permission java.io.SocketPermission "*", "connect"; };
To check whether the caller has the requisite permissions, standard Java APIs use code, such as the following:
// Security manager code perm = new java.io.FilePermission("/tmp/JavaFile", "read"); AccessController.checkPermission(perm); // ...
Always assign appropriate permissions to code. Define custom permissions when the granularity of the standard permissions is insufficient. See guideline SEC10-J. Define custom security permissions for fine grained security for more information.
Noncompliant Code Example (PermissionCollection
)
This noncompliant example shows an overridden getPermissions()
method that is defined in a custom class loader. The class loader erroneously grants java.security.AllPermission
to any class that it loads.
protected PermissionCollection getPermissions(CodeSource cs) { PermissionCollection pc = new Permissions(); pc.add(new java.security.AllPermission()); // other permissions return pc; }
This example also violates guideline SEC11-J. Call the superclass's getPermissions method when writing a custom class loader.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution fails to grant the java.security.AllPermission
to any class that it loads.
protected PermissionCollection getPermissions(CodeSource cs) { PermissionCollection pc = super.getPermissions(cs); // add fine-grained permissions return pc; }
Exceptions
ENV03-EX1: It may be necessary to grant AllPermission
to trusted library code so that callbacks work as expected. For example, it is common practice to grant AllPermission
to the optional Java packages (extension libraries):
// Standard extensions extend the core platform and are granted all permissions by default grant codeBase "file:${{java.ext.dirs}}/*" { permission java.security.AllPermission; };
Risk Assessment
Granting AllPermission
to untrusted code allows it to perform privileged operations.
Guideline |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENV03-J |
high |
likely |
low |
P27 |
L1 |
Automated Detection
Static detection of potential uses of AllPermission
is a trivial search. Automated determination of the correctness of such uses is not feasible.
Related Vulnerabilities
Bibliography
[[API 2006]] Class AllPermission
[[Gong 2003]]
[[Security 2006]] Security Architecture
ENV02-J. Create a secure sandbox using a Security Manager Runtime Environment (ENV) ENV04-J. Do not grant ReflectPermission with target suppressAccessChecks