You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 52 Next »

Proper input validation can prevent insertion of malicious data into the system. However, such validation fails to provide the assurance that validated data remains consistent throughout its lifetime. For instance, if an insider is allowed to insert data into a database without validation, he can glean unauthorized information or execute arbitrary code on the client side by means of attacks such as Cross Site Scripting (XSS) [OWASP 2011]. Output filtering to prevent such attacks is as important as input validation.

As with input validation, normalize data before filtering for malicious characters. To avoid vulnerabilities caused by data that bypasses validation, we recommend that all output characters other than those known to be safe are encoded.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example displays input obtained from a database directly to the user without performing any output validation or encoding.

public class BadOutput {
  // description and input are String variables containing values obtained from a database
  // description = "description" and input = "<script> executable code </script>"
  public static void display(String description, String input) {
    // Display to the user or pass description and input to another system
  }
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution defines a ValidateOutput class that normalizes the output to a known character set, performs output validation using a white-list and encodes any non-specified data values to enforce a double checking mechanism. Different fields may require different white-listing patterns [OWASP 2008].

public class ValidateOutput {
  // Allows only alphanumeric characters and spaces
  private Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("^[a-zA-Z0-9\\s]{0,20}$");

  // Validates and encodes the input field based on a whitelist
  private String validate(String name, String input) throws ValidationException {
    String canonical = normalize(input);

    if(!pattern.matcher(canonical).matches()) {
      throw new ValidationException("Improper format in " + name + " field");
    }
    
    // Performs output encoding for non valid characters 
    canonical = HTMLEntityEncode(canonical);
    return canonical;
  }

  // Normalizes to known instances 	
  private String normalize(String input) {
    String canonical = java.text.Normalizer.normalize(input, Normalizer.Form.NFKC);
    return canonical;
  }

  // Encodes non valid data
  public static String HTMLEntityEncode(String input) {
    StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();

    for (int i = 0; i < input.length(); i++) {
      char ch = input.charAt(i);
        if (Character.isLetterOrDigit(ch) || Character.isWhitespace(ch)) {
          sb.append(ch);
        } else {
          sb.append("&#" + (int)ch + ";");
        }
    }
    return sb.toString();
  }

  // description and input are String variables containing values obtained from a database
  // description = "description" and input = "2 items available"
  public static void display(String description, String input) throws ValidationException {
    ValidateOutput vo = new ValidateOutput();
    vo.validate(description, input);
    // Pass to another system or display to the user
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Failure to encode or escape output before it is displayed or passed across a trust boundary can result in the execution of arbitrary code.

Guideline

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

IDS50-JG

high

probable

medium

P12

L1

Related Vulnerabilities

GERONIMO-1474

Bibliography

[MITRE 2009] CWE ID 116 "Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output"
[OWASP 2008] How to add validation logic to HttpServletRequest, XSS (Cross Site Scripting) Prevention Cheat Sheet
[OWASP 2011] Cross-site Scripting (XSS)


  • No labels