Java'€™s garbage-collection feature provides significant benefits from a security perspective over non-garbage-collected languages such as C and C++. The garbage collector (GC) is designed to automatically reclaim unreachable memory and avoid memory leaks. Although it is quite adept at performing this task, a malicious attacker can nevertheless launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack, such as by inducing abnormal heap memory allocation or abnormally prolonged object retention. For example, some versions of the garbage collector could need to halt all executing threads to keep up with incoming allocation requests that trigger increased heap management activity. System throughput rapidly diminishes in this scenario. Real-time systems, in particular, are vulnerable to a more subtle slow-heap-exhaustion DoS attack, perpetrated by stealing CPU cycles. An attacker can perform memory allocations in a way that increases the consumption of resources (such as CPU, battery power, and memory) without triggering an OutOfMemoryError. Writing garbage-collection-friendly code helps restrict many attack avenues.

Use Short-Lived Immutable Objects

Since JDK 1.2, the generational garbage collector has reduced memory allocation costs to low levels, in many cases lower than in C or C++. Generational garbage collection reduces garbage collection costs by grouping objects into generations. The younger generation consists of short-lived objects. The garbage collector performs a minor collection on the younger generation when it fills up with dead objects [Oracle 2010a]. Improved garbage-collection algorithms have reduced the cost of garbage collection so that it is proportional to the number of live objects in the younger generation rather than to the number of objects allocated since the last garbage collection.

Note that objects in the younger generation that persist for longer durations are tenured and are moved to the tenured generation. Few younger-generation objects continue to live through to the next garbage-collection cycle. The rest become ready to be collected in the impending collection cycle [Oracle 2010a].

With generational garbage collectors, use of short-lived immutable objects is generally more efficient than use of long-lived mutable objects, such as object pools. Avoiding object pools improves the garbage collector's efficiency. Object pools bring additional costs and risks: they can create synchronization problems and can require explicit management of deallocations, possibly creating problems with dangling pointers. Further, determining the correct amount of memory to reserve for an object pool can be difficult, especially for mission-critical code. Use of long-lived mutable objects remains appropriate when allocation of objects is particularly expensive (for example, when performing multiple joins across databases). Similarly, object pools are an appropriate design choice when the objects represent scarce resources, such as thread pools and database connections.

OBJ05-J. Defensively copy private mutable class members before returning their references and OBJ06-J. Defensively copy mutable inputs and mutable internal components promote garbage-collection-friendly code.

Avoid Large Objects

The allocation of large objects is expensive, in part because the cost to initialize their fields is proportional to their size. Additionally, frequent allocation of large objects of different sizes can cause fragmentation issues or noncompacting collect operations.

Do Not Explicitly Invoke the Garbage Collector

The garbage collector can be explicitly invoked by calling the System.gc() method. Even though the documentation says that it "runs the garbage collector,"€ there is no guarantee as to when or whether the garbage collector will actually run. In fact, the call only suggests that the garbage collector should subsequently execute.

Irresponsible use of this feature can severely degrade system performance by triggering garbage collection at inopportune moments rather than waiting until ripe periods when it is safe to garbage-collect without significant interruption of the program'€™s execution.

In the Java Hotspot VM (default since JDK 1.2), System.gc() forces an explicit garbage collection. Such calls can be buried deep within libraries, so they may be difficult to trace. To ignore the call in such cases, use the flag -XX:+DisableExplicitGC. To avoid long pauses while performing a full garbage collection, a less demanding concurrent cycle may be invoked by specifying the flag -XX:ExplicitGCInvokedConcurrent.

Applicability

Misusing garbage-collection utilities can cause severe performance degradation resulting in a DoS attack.

When an application goes through several phases, such as an initialization and a ready phase, it could require heap compaction between phases. The System.gc() method may be invoked in such cases, provided a suitable uneventful period occurs between phases.

Related Vulnerabilities

The Apache Geronimo and Tomcat vulnerability GERONIMO-4574, reported in March 2009, resulted from PolicyContext handler data objects being set in a thread and never released, causing these data objects to remain in memory longer than necessary.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography