Note: I merely modified the equivalent rule for equals to make this rule.
It also seems like I'm sort of just copying from the Java standard,
but I can't think of any reason why if we have an equals rule
we should not have a compareTo rule, since it is so often used with equals.
This rule could be extended to deal with Comparator as well; since they go together.
The general usage contract for compareTo()
has been put forth verbatim from the Java specification:
The implementor must ensure sgn(x.compareTo ) == -sgn(y.compareTo ) for all x and y. (This implies that x.compareTo must throw an exception iff y.compareTo throws an exception.)
The implementor must also ensure that the relation is transitive: (x.compareTo >0 && y.compareTo(z)>0) implies x.compareTo(z)>0.
Finally, the implementor must ensure that x.compareTo ==0 implies that sgn(x.compareTo(z)) == sgn(y.compareTo(z)), for all z.
Do not violate any of five conditions while overriding the compareTo
method.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example violates the third condition in the contract.
Consider a Card that considers itself equal to any card of the same suit; otherwise it orders based on rank.
public final class Card implements Comparable{ private String suit; private int rank; public Card(String s, int r) { if (s == null) throw new NullPointerException(); suit = s; rank = r; } public boolean equals(Object o) { if (o instanceof Card){ Card c=(Card)o; return suit.equals(c.suit) || (rank == c.rank); } return false; } //this method violates its contract public int compareTo(Object o){ if (o instanceof Card){ Card c=(Card)o; if(suit.equals(c.suit)) return 0; return c.rank - rank; } throw new ClassCastException(); } public static void main(String[] args) { Card a = new Card("Clubs", 2); Card b = new Card("Clubs", 10); Card c = new Card("Hearts", 7); System.out.println(a.compareTo(b)); //returns 0 System.out.println(a.compareTo(c)); //returns a negative number System.out.println(b.compareTo(c)); //returns a positive number } }
Compliant Solution
Make sure you fulfill the contract, and make sure your corresponding equals method matches with compareTo.
public final class Card implements Comparable{ private String suit; private int rank; public Card(String s, int r) { if (s == null) throw new NullPointerException(); suit = s; rank = r; } public boolean equals(Object o) { if (o instanceof Card){ Card c=(Card)o; return suit.equals(c.suit) && (rank == c.rank); } return false; } //this method fulfills its contract public int compareTo(Object o){ if (o instanceof Card){ Card c=(Card)o; if(suit.equals(c.suit)) return c.rank - rank; return suit.compareTo(c.suit); } throw new ClassCastException(); } public static void main(String[] args) { Card a = new Card("Clubs", 2); Card b = new Card("Clubs", 2); Card c = new Card("Hearts", 7); System.out.println(a.compareTo(b)); //returns 0 System.out.println(a.compareTo(c)); //returns a negative number System.out.println(b.compareTo(c)); //returns a negative number } }
Risk Assessment
Violating the general contract when overriding the equals()
method can lead to unexpected results.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET30-J |
low |
unlikely |
medium |
P2 |
L3 |
Automated Detection
TODO
References
Java API