Declaring multiple variables in a single declaration may cause confusion regarding the types of the variables and their initial values. In particular do not declare any of the following in a single declaration:
- variables of different types
- a mixture of initialized and uninitialized variables
In general, you should declare each variable on its own line with an explanatory comment regarding its role. Although not required for conformance with this guide, this practice is also recommended in the Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language Conventions 2009 Section 6.1, "Number Per Line".
When more than one variable is declared in a single declaration, ensure that both the type and the initial value of each variable are self evident.
This guideline applies to:
- local variable declaration statements (JLS §14.4)
- field declarations (JLS §8.3)
- field (constant) declarations (JLS §9.3)
Noncompliant Code Example (initialization)
This noncompliant code example might lead a programmer or reviewer to mistakenly believe that both i
and j
are initialized to 1. In fact, only j
is initialized; i
remains uninitialized.
int i, j = 1;
Compliant Solution (initialization)
In this compliant solution, it is readily apparent that both i
and j
are initialized to 1.
int i = 1; // purpose of i... int j = 1; // purpose of j...
Compliant Solution (initialization)
In this compliant solution, it is readily apparent that both i
and j
are initialized to 1.
int i = 1, j = 1;
Prefer declaring each variable on a separate line; however, multiple variables on one line are acceptable when they are small temporary variables, such as array indexes.
Noncompliant Code Example (different types)
In this noncompliant code example, the programmer declares multiple variables, including an array, on the same line. All instances of the type T
have access to methods of the class Object
. However, it is easy to forget that arrays require special treatment when some of these methods are overridden.
public class Example<T> { private T a, b, c[], d; public Example(T in) { a = in; b = in; c = (T[]) new Object[10]; d = in; } }
When a method of Object
such as toString()
is overridden, a programmer might accidentally provide an implementation for type T
that fails to consider that c
is an array of T
, rather than a reference to an object of type T
.
public String toString() { return a.toString() + b.toString() + c.toString() + d.toString(); }
However, the programmer's actual intent might have been to invoke toString()
on each individual element of the array c
.
// Correct functional implementation public String toString(){ String s = a.toString() + b.toString(); for(int i = 0; i < c.length; i++){ s += c[i].toString(); } s += d.toString(); return s; }
Compliant Solution (different types)
This compliant solution not only places each declaration on its own line, it also uses the preferred notation for array declaration.
public class Example { private T a; // purpose of a... private T b; // purpose of b... private T[] c; // purpose of c[]... private T d; // purpose of d... public Example(T in){ a = in; b = in; c = (T[]) new Object[10]; d = in; } }
Exceptions
DCL01-EX1: Note that the declaration of a loop counter in a for statement is in violation of this recommendation because the declaration is not on its own line with an explanatory comment about the role of the variable. However, declaration of loop indices in for statements is not only a common idiom; it also provides the benefit of restricting the scope of the loop index to that of the for loop itself. These are sufficient reasons to relax this guideline in this specific case.
Declarations of loop indices should be included within a for statement:
for (int i = 0; i < mx; ++i ) { /* ... */ }
Risk Assessment
Declaration of multiple variables per line can reduce code readability and lead to programmer confusion.
Guideline |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL01-J |
low |
unlikely |
low |
P3 |
L3 |
Related Guidelines
C Secure Coding Standard: DCL04-C. Do not declare more than one variable per declaration
C++ Secure Coding Standard: DCL04-CPP. Do not declare more than one variable per declaration
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.
Bibliography
[[Conventions 2009]] Section 6.1, "Number Per Line"
[[ESA 2005]] Rule 9: Put single variable definitions in separate lines.
[[JLS 2005]] Section 8.3, "Field Declarations", Section 9.3, "Field (Constant) Declarations"Section 14.4, "Local Variable Declaration Statements" Section 6.1, "Declarations", Section 4.3.2, "The class Object"
DCL00-J. Use visually distinct identifiers 03. Declarations and Initialization (DCL) DCL02-J. Use meaningful symbolic constants to represent literal values in program logic