You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 34 Next »

Every declaration should be for a single variable, on its own line, with an explanatory comment about the role of the variable. Declaring multiple variables in a single statement may cause confusion regarding the types of the variables and their initial values. When more than one variable is declared in a declaration, ensure that the type and initial value of the variable are self evident.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, a programmer or code reviewer might mistakenly believe that the variables src and c are both declared as type int. In fact, src is of type int[], while c has a type of int.

int src[], c;

This example declares the array in an antiquated and unpopular style, with the brackets appearing after the variable name. Arrays should be declared as type[] name, for improved clarity.

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, each variable is declared on a separate line, using the preferred style for declaring arrays.

int[] src;   /* source array */
int c;       /* max value    */

Although this change has no effect on compilation, it clarifies the programmer's intent.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example might lead a programmer or reviewer to mistakenly believe that both i and j are initialized to 1. In fact, only j is initialized; i remains uninitialized.

int i, j = 1;

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, it is readily apparent that both i and j are initialized to 1.

int i = 1;  // purpose of i...
int j = 1;  // purpose of j...

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example the programmer declared multiple variables, including an array, on the same line. All instances of the type T have access to methods of the class Object. However, it is easy to forget that arrays require special treatment when some of these methods are overridden.

public class Example<T> {
  private T a, b, c[], d;

  public Example(T in){
    a = in;
    b = in;
    c = (T[]) new Object[10];
    d = in;
  }
}

When a method of Object like toString() is overridden, a programmer might accidentally provide an implementation for type T that fails to account for the fact that c is an array of T rather than a reference to an object of type T.

// The oversight leads to an incorrect implementation
public String toString(){
  return a.toString() + b.toString() + c.toString() + d.toString();
}

However, the real intent might have been to invoke toString() on each individual element of the array c.

// Correct functional implementation
public String toString(){
  String s = a.toString() + b.toString();
  for(int i = 0; i < c.length; i++){
    s += c[i].toString();
  }
  s += d.toString();
  return s;
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution places each declaration on its own line as well as using the preferred notation for array declaration.

public class Example {
  private T a;   // purpose of a...
  private T b;   // purpose of b...
  private T[] c; // purpose of c[]...
  private T d;   // purpose of d...

  public Example(T in){
    a = in;
    b = in;
    c = (T[]) new Object[10];
    d = in;
  }
}

Exceptions

DCL04-01: Note that the declaration of a loop counter in a for statement is in violation of this recommendation, because the declaration is not on its own line with an explanatory comment about the role of the variable. However, declaration of loop indices in for statements is not only a very common idiom; it also provides the benefit of restricting the scope of the loop index to that of the for loop itself. These are sufficient reasons to relax this guideline in this specific case.

Declarations of loop indices should be included within a for statement:

for (int i = 0; i < mx; ++i ) {
  /* ... */
}

Risk Assessment

Declaration of more than one variable per line may reduce code readability and lead to programmer confusion.

Guideline

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

DCL01-J

low

unlikely

low

P3

L3

Other Languages

This guideline appears in the C Secure Coding Standard as DCL04-C. Do not declare more than one variable per declaration.

This guideline appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as DCL04-CPP. Do not declare more than one variable per declaration.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.

Bibliography

[[Conventions 2009]] 6.1 Number Per Line
[[ESA 2005]] Rule 9: Put single variable definitions in separate lines.
[[JLS 2005]] Section 6.1, "Declarations", Section 4.3.2, "The class Object"


DCL00-J. Use visually distinct identifiers      03. Declarations and Initialization (DCL)      DCL02-J. Use meaningful symbolic constants to represent literal values in program logic

  • No labels