Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Do no evaluate any pointers into freed memory after an allocated block of dynamic storage has been deallocated by a memory management function, including dereferencing or acting as an operand of an arithmetic operation, type casting, or using the pointer as the right-hand side of an assignment.

According to the C Standard, the behavior of a program that uses the value of a pointer that refers to space deallocated by a call to the free() or realloc() function is undefined. (See undefined behavior 177  of Annex J.)

Reading a pointer to deallocated memory is undefined because the pointer value is indeterminate and can have a trap representation. In the latter case, doing so may cause a hardware trap.

Accessing memory once it is freed may corrupt the data structures used to manage the heap. References to memory that has been deallocated are referred to as dangling pointers. Accessing a dangling pointer can result in exploitable vulnerabilities.

When memory is freed, its contents may remain intact and accessible because it is at the memory manager's discretion when to reallocate or recycle the freed chunk. The data at the freed location may appear valid. However, this can change unexpectedly, leading to unintended program behavior. As a result, it is necessary to guarantee that memory is not written to or read from once it is freed.

Noncompliant Code Example

This example from Brian Kernighan and Dennis Ritchie [Kernighan 1988] shows both the incorrect and correct techniques for deleting items from a linked list. The incorrect solution, clearly marked as wrong in the book, is bad because p is freed before the p->next is executed, so p->next reads memory that has already been freed.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = p->next)
    free(p);

Compliant Solution

Kernighan and Ritchie also show the correct solution. To correct this error, a reference to p->next is stored in q before freeing p.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = q) {
  q = p->next;
  free(p);
}
head = NULL;

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, buff is written to after it has been freed. These vulnerabilities can be easily exploited to run arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process and are seldom this obvious. Typically, allocations and frees are far removed, making it difficult to recognize and diagnose these problems.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
  char *buff;

  buff = (char *)malloc(BUFFERSIZE);
  if (!buff) {
     /* Handle error condition */
  }
  /* ... */
  free(buff);
  /* ... */
  strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFFERSIZE-1);
}

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution do not free the memory until it is no longer required:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
  char *buff;

  buff = (char *)malloc(BUFFERSIZE);
  if (!buff) {
     /* Handle error condition */
  }
  /* ... */
  strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFFERSIZE-1);
  /* ... */
  free(buff);
}

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant example (CVE-2009-1364) from libwmf version 0.2.8.4, the return value of gdRealloc (a simple wrapper around realloc which reallocates space pointed to by im->clip->list) is set to more. However, the value of im->clip->list is used directly afterwards in the code, and the C Standard specifies that if realloc moves the area pointed to, then the original is freed. An attacker can then execute arbitrary code by forcing a reallocation (with a sufficient im->clip->count) and accessing freed memory [xorl 2009].

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
void gdClipSetAdd(gdImagePtr im,gdClipRectanglePtr rect) {
  gdClipRectanglePtr more;
  if (im->clip == 0) {
    ...
  }
  if (im->clip->count == im->clip->max) {
    more = gdRealloc (im->clip->list,(im->clip->max + 8) *
                      sizeof (gdClipRectangle));
    if (more == 0) return; //if the realloc fails, then we have not lost the im->clip->list value
    im->clip->max += 8;
  }
  im->clip->list[im->clip->count] = (*rect);
  im->clip->count++;

Compliant Solution

The compliant solution simply reassigns im->clip->list to the value of more after the call to realloc:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
void gdClipSetAdd(gdImagePtr im,gdClipRectanglePtr rect) {
  gdClipRectanglePtr more;
  if (im->clip == 0) {
    ...
  }
  if (im->clip->count == im->clip->max) {
    more = gdRealloc (im->clip->list,(im->clip->max + 8) *
                      sizeof (gdClipRectangle));
    if (more == 0) return;
    im->clip->max += 8;
    im->clip->list = more;
  }
  im->clip->list[im->clip->count] = (*rect);
  im->clip->count++;

Risk Assessment

Reading memory that has already been freed can lead to abnormal program termination and denial-of-service attacks. Writing memory that has already been freed can lead to the execution of arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

MEM30-C

high

likely

medium

P18

L1

Automated Detection

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

Compass/ROSE

 

 

 

Coverity

Include Page
Coverity_V
Coverity_V

USE_AFTER_FREE

Can detect the specific instances where memory is deallocated more than once or read/written to the target of a freed pointer

Fortify SCA

5.0

 

 

Klocwork

Include Page
Klocwork_V
Klocwork_V

UFM.DEREF.MIGHT
UFM.DEREF.MUST
UFM.RETURN.MIGHT
UFM.RETURN.MUST
UFM.USE.MIGHT
UFM.USE.MUST

 

LDRA tool suite

Include Page
LDRA_V
LDRA_V

51 D

Fully implemented

Splint

Include Page
Splint_V
Splint_V

 

 

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

CERT C++ Secure Coding StandardMEM30-CPP. Do not access freed memory
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013Dangling References to Stack Frames [DCM]
Dangling Reference to Heap [XYK]
ISO/IEC TS 17961 (Draft)Accessing freed memory [accfree]
MISRA C:2012Rule 18.6 (required)
MITRE CWECWE-416, Use after free

Bibliography

[Kernighan 1988]Section 7.8.5, "Storage Management"
[OWASP Freed Memory] 
[Seacord 2013]Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management"
[Viega 2005]Section 5.2.19, "Using Freed Memory"
[xorl 2009]CVE-2009-1364: LibWMF Pointer Use after free()