Dynamic memory management is a common source of programming flaws that can lead to security vulnerabilities. Decisions regarding how dynamic memory is allocated, used, and deallocated are the burden of the programmer. Poor memory management can lead to security issues, such as heap-buffer overflows, dangling pointers, and double-free issues [Seacord 2005a]. From the programmer's perspective, memory management involves allocating memory, reading and writing to memory, and deallocating memory.
Allocating and freeing memory in different modules and levels of abstraction may make it difficult to determine when and if a block of memory has been freed, leading to programming defects, such as memory leaks, double-free vulnerabilities, accessing freed memory, or writing to freed or unallocated memory.
To avoid these situations, memory should be allocated and freed at the same level of abstraction and, ideally, in the same code module. This includes the use of the following memory allocation and deallocation functions described in Section 7.23.3 of the C standard Standard [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]:
Code Block |
---|
void *malloc(size_t size); void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size); void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size); void *aligned_alloc(size_t alignment, size_t size); void free(void *ptr); |
Failing to follow this recommendation has led to real-world vulnerabilities. For example, freeing memory in different modules resulted in a vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 [MIT 2004]. The MIT Kerberos 5 code in this case contained error-handling logic, which freed memory allocated by the ASN.1 decoders if pointers to the allocated memory were non-null. However, if a detectable error occurred, the ASN.1 decoders freed the memory that they had allocated. When some library functions received errors from the ASN.1 decoders, they also attempted to free the same memory, resulting in a double-free vulnerability.
...
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Include Page | LDRA_V | LDRA_V | 50 D | Partially implemented. | Fortify SCA | V. 5.0 | Can detect violations of this rule with CERT C Rule Pack. | ||||||
Compass/ROSE |
|
| Could detect possible violations by reporting any function that has | ||||||||||
| USE_AFTER_FREE | Can detect the specific instances where memory is deallocated more than once or read/written to the target of a freed pointer. | |||||||||||
Fortify SCA | 5.0 |
| Can detect violations of this rule with CERT C Rule Pack. | ||||||||||
| 50 D | Partially implemented. |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelimes
...
...
...
Memory leak |
...
[XYL] |
MITRE CWE |
...
...
Use after free |
...
...
...
Double free |
...
Bibliography
[MIT 2004] | |
[Plakosh 2005] | |
[Seacord 2005a] | Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management" |
...