Versions Compared
compared with
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
Comment:
A couple editorial questions/notes on this section. I only cited the C99 reference on the first occurrence--it seemed excessive to include it on every reference. Not sure what we've been doing on this point. Also, it seems like there should be a reference list entry for ISO C89 (if there is, it was apparent to me). Finally, regarding my edits to the numbered list, I've committed editorial heresy: converting active voice to passive voice. I did this because the passive voice is used so pervasively in this text that the switch to the active voice seemed out of place, and I was instructed that reworking the text to the active voice is beyond the scope of this edit. Ed.