...
The following sections examine specific operations that are susceptible to integer overflow. The specific tests that are required to guarantee that the operation does not result in an integer overflow depend on the signedness of the integer types. When operating on small types (smaller than int
), integer conversion rules apply. The usual arithmetic conversions may also be applied to (implicitly) convert operands to equivalent types before arithmetic operations are performed. Make sure you understand implicit conversion rules before trying to implement secure arithmetic operations.
Addition
Addition is between two operands of arithmetic type or between a pointer to an object type and an integer type. (Incrementing is equivalent to adding one.)
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code mayresult in an unsigned integer overflow during the addition of the unsigned operands ui1 and ui2. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, sum;
sum = ui1 + ui2;
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect addition operation to guarantee there is no possibility of unsigned overflow.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, sum;
if (~ui1 < ui2) {
/* handle error condition */
}
sum = ui1 + ui2;
|
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code may result in a signed integer oveflow during the addition of the signed operands si1 and si2. If this behavior is unanticipated, it could lead to an exploit vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
int si1, si2, sum;
sum = si1 + si2;
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect addition operation to ensure no overflow occurs.
...
Children Display | ||
---|---|---|
|
Include Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subtraction
Subtraction is between two operands of arithmetic type, two pointers to qualified or unqualified versions of compatible object types, or between a pointer to an object type and an integer type. (Decrementing is equivalent to subtracting one.)
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in a signed integer overflow during the subtraction of the signed operands si1
and si2
. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
signed int si1, si2, result; result = si1 - si2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect subtraction operation to guarantee there is no possibility of signed overflow.
Code Block |
---|
signed int si1, si2, result; if ( ((si1^si2)&((si1-si2)^si1)) >> (sizeof(int)*CHAR_BIT-1) ) { /* handle error condition */ } result = si1 - si2; |
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code may result in an unsigned integer overflow during the subtraction of the unsigned operands ui1
and ui2
. If this behavior is unanticipated it may lead to an exploit vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, result; result = ui1 - ui2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect unsigned subtraction operation to guarantee there is no possibility of unsigned overflow.
...
Multiplication is between two operands of arithmetic type.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in a signed integer overflow during the multiplication of the signed operands si1
and si2
. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
signed int si1, si2, result; result = si1 * si2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect multiplication operation to guarantee there is no possibility of signed overflow.
...
Code Block |
---|
signed int si1, si2, result; if (si1 > 0){ /* si1 is positive */ if (si2 > 0) { /* si1 and si2 are positive */ if (si1 > (INT_MAX / si2)) { /* handle error condition */ } } /* end if si1 and si2 are positive */ else { /* si1 positive, si2 non-positive */ if (si2 < (INT_MIN / si1)) { /* handle error condition */ } } /* si1 positive, si2 non-positive */ } /* end if si1 is positive */ else { /* si1 is non-positive */ if (si2 > 0) { /* si1 is non-positive, si2 is positive */ if (si1 < (INT_MIN / si2)) { /* handle error condition */ } } /* end if si1 is non-positive, si2 is positive */ else { /* si1 and si2 are non-positive */ if( (si1 != 0) && (si2 < (INT_MAX / si1))) { /* handle error condition */ } } /* end if si1 and si2 are non-positive */ } /* end if si1 is non-positive */ result = si1 * si2; |
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code may result in an unsigned integer overflow during the multiplication of the operands ui1
and ui2
. If unanticipated this overflow may lead to and exploit vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, result; result = ui1 * ui2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect multiplication operation to guarantee that there is no unsigned integer overflow.
...
Division is between two operands of arithmetic type. Overflow can occur during twos-complement signed integer division when the dividend is equal to the minimum (negative) value for the signed integer type and the divisor is equal to -1. Both signed and unsigned division operations are also susceptible to divide-by-zero errors.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in a signed integer overflow during the division of the signed operands sl1
and sl2
or in a divide-by-zero error. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
signed long sl1, sl2, result; result = sl1 / sl2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect division operation to guarantee there is no possibility of signed overflow or divide-by-zero errors.
...
The unary negation operator takes an operand of arithmetic type. Overflow can occur during twos-complement unary negation when the operand is equal to the minimum (negative) value for the signed integer type.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in a signed integer overflow during the unary negation of the signed operand si1. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
signed int si1, result; result = -si1; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect negation operation to guarantee there is no possibility of signed overflow.
...
The left shift operator is between two operands of integer type.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in an unsigned overflow during the shift operation of the unsigned operands ui1
and ui2
. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, result; result = ui1 << ui2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect shift operation to guarantee there is no possibility of unsigned overflow.
...
The shift operator is between two operands of integer type.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This code can result in an unsigned overflow during the shift operation of the unsigned operands ui1
and ui2
. If this behavior is unanticipated, the resulting value may be used to allocate insufficient memory for a subsequent operation or in some other manner that could lead to an exploitable vulnerability.
Code Block |
---|
unsigned int ui1, ui2, result; result = ui1 >> ui2; |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution tests the suspect shift operation to guarantee there is no possibility of unsigned overflow.
...