The calloc()
function takes two arguments: the number of elements to allocate and the storage size of those elements. Typically, calloc()
implementations multiply these arguments to determine how much memory to allocate. Historically, some implementations failed to check if out-of-bounds results silently wrap [RUS-CERT Advisory 2002-08:02]. If the result of multiplying the number of elements to allocate and the storage size cannot be represented as a size_t
wraps, less memory is allocated than was requested. As a result, it is necessary to ensure that these arguments, when multiplied, can be represented as a size_t
do not wrap.
Modern implementations of the C standard library should check for wrap. If the libraries used for a particular implementation properly handle unsigned integer wrapping on the multiplication, that is sufficient to comply with this recommendation.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant example, the user-defined function get_size()
(not shown) is used to calculate the size requirements for a dynamic array of long int
that is assigned to the variable num_elements
. When calloc()
is called to allocate the buffer, num_elements
is multiplied by sizeof(long)
to compute the overall size requirements. If the number of elements multiplied by the size cannot be represented as a size_t
, then calloc()
may allocate a buffer of insufficient size. When data is copied to that buffer, an overflow may occur.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
size_t num_elements; long *buffer = (long *)calloc(num_elements, sizeof(long)); if (buffer == NULL) { /* Handle error condition */ } /*...*/ free(buffer); buffer = NULL; |
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the two arguments num_elements
and sizeof(long)
are checked before the call to calloc()
to determine if wrapping will occur.
...
Note that the maximum amount of allocatable memory is typically limited to a value less than SIZE_MAX
(the maximum value of size_t
). Always check the return value from a call to any memory allocation function in compliance with MEM32-C. Detect and handle memory allocation errors.
Risk Assessment
Unsigned integer wrapping in memory allocation functions can lead to buffer overflows that can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process. Most implementations of calloc()
now check to make sure silent wrapping does not occur, but it is not always safe to assume the version of calloc()
being used is secure, particularly when using dynamically linked libraries.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM07-C | high | unlikely | medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Compass/ROSE |
|
|
|
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
CERT C++ Secure Coding Standard: MEM07-CPP. Ensure that the arguments to calloc(), when multiplied, can be represented as a size_t
...
MITRE CWE: CWE-128, "Wrap-around error"
Bibliography
[Seacord 2005] Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management"
[RUS-CERT] Advisory 2002-08:02, "Flaw in calloc and similar routines"
[Secunia] Advisory SA10635, "HP-UX calloc buffer size miscalculation vulnerability"
...