Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: added content from 2016 edition v1.0 (and removed green from spell check)

...

  • ISO/IEC 9899:2011 ISO/IEC, Programming Languages—C, 3rd ed. [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]
  • ISO/IEC 9899:2011/Cor.1:2012, Technical Corrigendum 1

...

The C Standard documents existing practice where possible. That is, most features must be tested in an an  implementation before being included in the standard. The CERT C Coding Standard has a different purpose: to establish a set of best practices, which sometimes requires introducing new practices that may not be widely known or used when existing practices are inadequate. To put it a different way, the CERT C Coding Standard attempts to drive change rather than just document it.

For example, the optional but normative Annex K, "Bounds“Bounds-Checking Interfaces," introduced in C11, is gaining support but at present is implemented by only a few vendors. It introduces functions such as memcpy_s(), which serve the purpose of security by adding the destination buffer size to the API. A forward-looking document could not reasonably ignore these functions simply because they are not yet widely implemented. The base C Standard is more widely implemented than Annex K, but even if it were not, it is the direction in which the industry is moving. Developers of new C code, especially, need guidance that is usable, on and makes the best use of, the compilers and tools that are now being developed and are being supported into the future.

...

In general, the CERT coding standards try to avoid the inclusion of controversial rules that lack a broad consensus.

 

...