Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: wordsmithing

Wiki Markup
 _Lazy initialization_ defers the construction of a member field or an object referred to by a member field until an instance is actually required, rather than computing the field value or constructing the referenced object in the class's constructor. Lazy initialization also helps to break harmful circularities in class and instance initialization and in performing other optimizations \[[Bloch 2005|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05]\].

...

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
// Correct multithreaded version using synchronization
final class Foo {
  private Helper helper = null;

  public synchronized Helper getHelper() {
    if (helper == null) {
      helper = new Helper();
    }
    return helper;
  }
  // ...
}

The double-checked locking idiom improves performance by limiting synchronization to the rare case of computing the field's value or constructing a new instance for the field to reference, and by foregoing synchronization during the common case of retrieving an already-created instance or value.

...

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
// "Double-Checked Locking" idiom
final class Foo {
  private Helper helper = null;
  public Helper getHelper() {
    if (helper == null) {
      synchronized (this) {
        if (helper == null) {
          helper = new Helper();
        }
      }
    }
    return helper;
  }

  // Other methods and members...
}

...

... writes that initialize the Helper object and the write to the helper field can be done or perceived out of order. As a result, a thread which invokes getHelper() could see a non-null reference to a helper object, but see the default values for fields of the helper object, rather than the values set in the constructor.

Even if the compiler does not reorder those writes, on a multiprocessor, the processor or the memory system may reorder those writes, as perceived by a thread running on another processor.

Also see rule This code also violates TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects.

Compliant Solution (

...

volatile)

This compliant solution declares the helper field volatile.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
// Works with acquire/release semantics for volatile
// Broken under JDK 1.4 and earlier
final class Foo {
  private volatile Helper helper = null;

  public Helper getHelper() {
    if (helper == null) {
      synchronized (this) {
        if (helper == null) {
          helper = new Helper(); // If the helper is null, create a new instance
        }
      }
    }
    return helper; // If helper is non-null, return its instance
  }
}

Wiki Markup
When a thread initializes the {{Helper}} object, a [happens-before relationship|BB. Definitions#happens-before order] is established between this thread and any other thread that retrieves and returns the instance \[[Pugh 2004|AA. Bibliography#Pugh 04], [Manson 2004|AA. Bibliography#Manson 04]\].

...

In this compliant solution, suppose that the Helper class is immutable. The JMM guarantees that immutable objects are fully constructed before they become visible to any other thread. Additionally, the block synchronization in the getHelper() method suffices to ensure that all methods that can see a non-null value of the helper field have a proper happens-before relationship for the update to the helper reference. This synchronization and the aforementioned JMM guarantee combine to ensure that only fully-initialized Helper objects are visible to threads that see non-null values. Consequently, this compliant solution correctly creates both of the needed happens-before relationships.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public final class Helper {
  private final int n;

  public Helper(int n) {
    this.n = n;
  }

  // Other fields and methods, all fields are final
}

final class Foo {
  private Helper helper = null;

  public Helper getHelper() {
    if (helper == null) {
      synchronized (this) {
        if (helper == null) {
          helper = new Helper(42); // If the helper is null, create a new instance

          }
      }
    }
    return helper; // If helper is non-null, return its instance
  }
}

Exceptions

Wiki Markup
*LCK10-EX0:* Use of the noncompliant form of the double-checked locking idiom is permitted for 32-bit primitive values (for example, {{int}} or {{float}}) \[[Pugh 2004|AA. Bibliography#Pugh 04]\], although this usage is discouraged. The noncompliant form establishes the necessary happens-before relationship between threads that see an initialized version of the primitive value. The second happens-before relationship (that for the initialization of the fields of the referent) is moot, because unsynchronized reads and writes of primitive values up to 32-bits are guaranteed to be atomic. Consequently, the noncompliant form establishes the only needed happens-before relationship in this case. Note, however, that the noncompliant form fails for {{long}} or {{double}} because unsynchronized reads/writes of 64-bit primitives lack a guarantee of atomicity, and thus require a second happens-before relationship to guarantee that all threads see only fully assigned 64-bit values (See rule [VNA05-J. Ensure atomicity when reading and writing 64-bit values].)

...

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="0930d04397c528af-1d328d3b-4c334e25-addb97d1-70afed5b651796ae7198b654"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[API 2006

AA. Bibliography#API 06]]

 

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="83b7a97cbf206109-b882254a-4b7d44c2-967d813d-976942d864b11a51ffbd005c"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[JLS 2005

AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]]

Section 12.4, "Initialization of Classes and Interfaces"

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="e1a1917865ff4066-d584f4ec-44fa40ee-a233b266-c2ad473cc4caab67af9c6848"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Pugh 2004

AA. Bibliography#Pugh 04]]

 

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="e5f1495372b7fb54-83bdd258-4f7448f1-8b8caec8-223839283d2ade9064748d67"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Bloch 2001

AA. Bibliography#Bloch 01]]

Item 48: "Synchronize access to shared mutable data"

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="c334b192bddd1f8b-833d4601-49b64570-9c498b06-99af9adf45a66f6c8b227f05"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Bloch 2008

AA. Bibliography#Bloch 08]]

Item 71: "Use lazy initialization judiciously"]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

...