Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: renamed to be stronger

...

The rule CON26-J. Do not publish partially-constructed objects discusses further the possibility of a non-null reference to a helper object with default values for fields in the helper object.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example uses the incorrect form of the double checked locking idiom.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
// "Double-Checked Locking" idiom
class Foo { 
  private Helper helper = null;
  public Helper getHelper() {
    if (helper == null) { 
      synchronized(this) {
        if (helper == null) {
          helper = new Helper();
        }
      }    
    }
    return helper;
  }
  // other functions and members...
}

Compliant Solution (volatile)

This compliant solution declares the Helper object as volatile.

...

Wiki Markup
JDK 5.0 allows a write of a {{volatile}} variable to be reordered with respect to a previous read or write. A read of a {{volatile}} variable cannot be reordered with respect to any following read or write. Because of this, the double checked locking idiom can work when {{helper}} is declared {{volatile}}. If a thread initializes the {{Helper}} object, a happens-before relationship is established between this thread and another that retrieves and returns the instance. \[[Pugh 04|AA. Java References#Pugh 04]\] and \[[Manson 04|AA. Java References#Manson 04]\] 

Compliant Solution (immutable)

In this solution the Foo class is unchanged, but the Helper class is immutable. In this case, the Helper class is guaranteed to be fully constructed before becoming visible. The object must be truly immutable; it is not sufficient for the program to refrain from modifying the object.

...

Note that if Foo was mutable, the Helper field would need to be declared volatile as shown in CON00-J. Declare shared variables as volatile to ensure visibility and prevent reordering of statements.

Compliant Solution (static initialization)

Wiki Markup
This compliant solution initializes the {{helper}} in the declaration of the {{static}} variable \[[Manson 06|AA. Java References#Manson 06]\]. 

...

Variables declared static are guaranteed to be initialized and made visible to other threads immediately. Static initializers also exhibit these properties. This approach should not be confused with eager initialization because in this case, the Java Language Specification guarantees lazy initialization of the class when it will be first used.

Compliant Solution (explicit static lazy initialization)

This compliant solution explicitly incorporates lazy initialization. It also uses a static variable as suggested in the previous compliant solution. The variable is declared within a static inner, Holder class.

...

Wiki Markup
This idiom is called the initialize-on-demand holder class idiom. Initialization of the {{Holder}} class is deferred until the {{getInstance()}} method is called, following which the {{helper}} is initialized. The only limitation of this method is that it works only for {{static}} fields and not instance fields. \[[Bloch 01|AA. Java References#Bloch 01]\]

Exceptions

EX1: Explicitly synchronized code (that uses method synchronization or proper block synchronization, that is, enclosing all initialization statements) does not require the use of double-checked locking.

Wiki Markup
*EX2:* "Although the double-checked locking idiom cannot be used for references to objects, it can work for 32-bit primitive values (e.g., int's or float's). Note that it does not work for long's or double's, since unsynchronized reads/writes of 64-bit primitives are not guaranteed to be atomic." \[[Pugh 04|AA. Java References#Pugh 04]\]. See [CON25-J. Ensure atomicity when reading and writing 64-bit values] for more Information. 

Risk Assessment

Using incorrect forms of the double checked locking idiom can lead to synchronization issues.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

CON22- J

low

probable

medium

P4

L3

Automated Detection

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

Wiki Markup
\[[API 06|AA. Java References#API 06]\] 
\[[Pugh 04|AA. Java References#Pugh 04]\]
\[[Bloch 01|AA. Java References#Bloch 01]\] Item 48: "Synchronize access to shared mutable data"
\[[MITRE 09|AA. Java References#MITRE 09]\] [CWE ID 609|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/609.html] "Double-Checked Locking"

...