...
In this noncompliant code example, security manager checks are used within the constructor but are omitted from the writeObject()
and readObject()
methods that are used in the serialization-deserialization process. This allows untrusted code to maliciously create instances of the class. Despite the security manager checks, the data is not considered sensitive, as a sensitive serializable class would violate SER03-J. Do not serialize sensitive data.
We assume that AccessDeniedException
and InvalidInputException
are both security exceptions, and hence require no checkingare not checked. So any method can throw them without requiring a throws
declaration.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public final class CreditCardHometown implements Serializable { // Private internal state private String credit_cardtown; private static final String DEFAULTUNKNOWN = "DEFAULTUNKNOWN"; void performSecurityManagerCheck() throws AccessDeniedException { // ... } void validateInput(String newCC) throws InvalidInputException { // ... } public CreditCardHometown() { performSecurityManagerCheck(); // Initialize credit_cardtown to default value credit_cardtown = DEFAULTUNKNOWN; } // Allows callers to retrieve internal state String getValue() { performSecurityManagerCheck(); return credit_cardtown; } // Allows callers to modify (private) internal state public void changeCCchangeTown(String newCCnewTown) { if (credit_cardtown.equals(newCCnewTown)) { // No change return; } else { performSecurityManagerCheck(); validateInput(newCCnewTown); credit_cardtown = newCCnewTown; } } // writeObject() correctly enforces checks during serialization private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException { out.writeObject(credit_cardtown); } // readObject() correctly enforces checks during deserialization private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException { in.defaultReadObject(); // If the deserialized name does not match the default value normally // created at construction time, duplicate the checks if (!DEFAULTUNKNOWN.equals(credit_cardtown)) { validateInput(credit_cardtown); } } } |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution implements the required security manager checks in all constructors and methods that can either modify or retrieve internal state. Consequently, an attacker cannot create a modified instance of the object (using deserialization) or read the serialized byte stream to uncover sensitive reveal serialized data.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public final class CreditCardHometown implements Serializable { // ... all methods the same except the following: // writeObject() correctly enforces checks during serialization private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException { performSecurityManagerCheck(); out.writeObject(credit_cardtown); } // readObject() correctly enforces checks during deserialization private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException { in.defaultReadObject(); // If the deserialized name does not match the default value normally // created at construction time, duplicate the checks if (!DEFAULTUNKNOWN.equals(credit_cardtown)) { performSecurityManagerCheck(); validateInput(credit_cardtown); } } } |
Refer to guideline SEC08-J. Protect sensitive operations with security manager checks to learn about implementing the performSecurityManagerCheck()
method. As with guideline SER04-J. Validate deserialized objects, it is important to protect against the finalizer attack.
...
Allowing serialization or deserialization to bypass the Security Manager may result in sensitive data being exposed or modifiedclasses being constructed without requird security checks.
Guideline | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SER05-J | high | probable | high | P6 | L2 |
...