Page History

According to the C Standard, 7.23.3, paragraph 6 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024],

The address of the FILE object used to control a stream may be significant; a copy of a FILE object

...

is not required to serve in place of the original.

Consequently, do not copy a FILE object.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example can fail because a by-value copy of stdout is being used in the call to fputs():

#include <stdio.h>
 
int main(void) {
  FILE my_stdout = *stdout;
  if (fputs("Hello, World!\n", &my_stdout) == EOF) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
  return 0;
}

When compiled under Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 and run on Windows, this noncompliant example results in an "access violation" at runtime.

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, a copy of the stdout pointer to the FILE object is used in the call to fputs():

#include <stdio.h>
 
int main(void) {
  FILE *my_stdout = stdout;
  if (fputs("Hello, World!\n", my_stdout) == EOF) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
  return 0;
}

Risk Assessment

Using a copy of a FILE object in place of the original .

References

may result in a crash, which can be used in a denial-of-service attack.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added

...