All good things must come to an end, and so do threads when they Threads preserve class invariants when they are allowed to exit normally. Unfortunately, programmers Programmers often try attempt to forcefully terminate threads abruptly when they believe that the task has been accomplishedis complete, the request has been canceled, or the program needs to quickly shutdown. or Java Virtual Machine (JVM) must shut down expeditiously.
Certain thread A few APIs were introduced to facilitate thread suspension, resumption, and termination but were later deprecated due to because of inherent design weaknesses. The For example, the Thread.stop
method is one such example. It was intended to ()
method causes the thread to immediately throw a ThreadDeath
exception. Two cases arise:
...
,
...
which usually stops the thread. More information about deprecated methods is available in MET02-J. Do not use deprecated or obsolete classes or methods.
Invoking Thread.stop()
results in the release of all locks a thread has acquired, potentially exposing the objects protected by those locks when those objects are in an inconsistent state. The thread might catch the ThreadDeath
exception and use a finally
block in an attempt to repair the inconsistent object or objects. However, doing so requires careful inspection of all synchronized methods and blocks because a ThreadDeath
exception can be thrown at any point during the thread's execution. Furthermore, code must be protected from ThreadDeath
exceptions that might occur while executing catch
or finally
blocks [Sun 1999]. Consequently, programs must not invoke Thread.stop()
.
Removing the java.lang.RuntimePermission stopThread
permission from the security policy file prevents threads from being stopped using the Thread.stop()
method. Although this approach guarantees that the program cannot use the Thread.stop()
method, it is nevertheless strongly discouraged. Existing trusted, custom-developed code that uses the Thread.stop()
method presumably depends on the ability of the system to perform this action. Furthermore, the system might fail to correctly handle the resulting security exception. Additionally, third-party libraries may also depend on use of the Thread.stop()
method.
Refer to ERR09-J. Do not allow untrusted code to terminate the JVM for information on preventing data corruption when the JVM is abruptly shut down.
Noncompliant Code Example (Deprecated Thread.stop()
)
This noncompliant code example shows a thread that fills a vector with pseudorandom numbers. The thread is forcefully stopped after a given amount of time.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public final class Container implements Runnable {
private final Vector<Integer> vector = new Vector<Integer>(1000);
public Vector<Integer> getVector |
- As a remediation measure, catching
ThreadDeath
on the other hand can itself ensnarl multithreaded code. For one, this exception can be thrown anywhere making it difficult to trace and recover effectively. Also, there is nothing stopping a thread from throwing anotherThreadDeath
exception while recovery is in progress.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example shows how a thread forcefully comes to a halt when the Thread.stop
method is invoked. Neither the catch
nor the finally
block is executed. Needless to say, any held monitors will be immediately released leaving the object in a delicate state.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class BadStop implements Runnable {
public void run() {
try {
Thread.currentThread().sleep(1000);
}catch(InterruptedException ie) { System.out.println("Performing cleanup"); } // not executed
finally { System.out.println("Closing resources"); } // not executed
System.out.println("Done!");
}
}
class Controller {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread t = new Thread(new BadStop());
t.start();
t.interrupt(); // artificially induce an InterruptedException
t.stop(); // force thread cancellation
}
}
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant example uses a boolean
flag called done
to indicate whether the thread should be stopped after any necessary cleanup code has finished executing. An accessor method shutdown()
is used to set the flag to true
upon which the thread will start the cancellation process. The done
flag has also been set immediately following the execution of the initial finally
block statements so that the system does not continue to relinquish the resources that it has already released, in the event of done
staying false
.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class ControlledStop implements Runnable{ protected volatile boolean done = false; public void run() { while(!done) {return vector; try {} @Override public synchronized void Thread.currentThreadrun().sleep(1000); { Random number }catch(InterruptedException ie) { System.out.println("Performing cleanup"); }= new Random(123L); int i finally { System.out.println("Closing resources"); = vector.capacity(); while (i > done = true; 0) { } } System.out.println("Done!"vector.add(number.nextInt(100)); } protected void shutdown(){ i--; done = true;} } } class Controller { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { ControlledStopThread cthread = new ControlledStop(); Thread t = Thread(new ThreadContainer(c)); tthread.start(); t.interrupt(); // artificially induce an InterruptedException Thread.sleep(1000); // wait for some time to allow the exception to be caught (demonstration only)5000); cthread.shutdownstop(); } } |
Noncompliant Code Example
Because the Vector
class is thread-safe, operations performed by multiple threads on its shared instance are expected to leave it in a consistent state. For instance, the Vector.size()
method always returns the correct number of elements in the vector, even after concurrent changes to the vector, because the vector instance uses its own intrinsic lock to prevent other threads from accessing it while its state is temporarily inconsistent.
However, the Thread.stop()
method causes the thread to stop what it is doing and throw a ThreadDeath
exception. All acquired locks are subsequently released [API 2014]. If the thread were in the process of adding a new integer to the vector when it was stopped, the vector would become accessible while it is in an inconsistent state. For example, this could result in Vector.size()
returning an incorrect element count because the element count is incremented after adding the element.
Compliant Solution (volatile flag)
This compliant solution uses a volatile flag to request thread termination. The shutdown()
accessor method is used to set the flag to true. The thread's run()
method polls the done
flag and terminates when it is setThis noncompliant solution uses the advice suggested in the previous compliant solution. Unfortunately, this does not help in terminating the thread since it is blocked on some network IO due to the readLine
method. The boolean flag trick will thus not work in such cases; a good alternative method to end the thread is required.
Code Block | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
public final class StopSocketContainer extendsimplements ThreadRunnable { private final Vector<Integer> vector protected= Socket snew Vector<Integer>(1000); protectedprivate volatile boolean done = false; public voidVector<Integer> rungetVector() { while(!done) {return vector; } public void tryshutdown() { sdone = new Socket("somehost",25)true; BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s.getInputStream())); String s = null;} @Override public synchronized while((s = br.readLine()) != nullvoid run() { Random number = // blocks until end of stream (null)new Random(123L); int i } System.out.println("Blocked, will not get executed until some data is received. " + s= vector.capacity(); while }catch (IOException ie) { System.out.println("Performing cleanup"); } finally!done && i > 0) { System.out.println("Closing resources"vector.add(number.nextInt(100)); done = true; }i--; } } public void shutdown() throws IOException { done = true; } } class Controller { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, IOException { Container StopSocket sscontainer = new StopSocketContainer(); Thread tthread = new Thread(sscontainer); tthread.start(); Thread.sleep(10005000); sscontainer.shutdown(); } } |
Compliant Solution (Interruptible)
The In this compliant solution simply closes the socket connection, both using the shutdown
method as well as in the finally
block. Thus, the thread is bound to stop due to a socketException
. Note that there is no way to keep the connection alive if the thread is to be cleanly halted immediatelythe Thread.interrupt()
method is called from main()
to terminate the thread. Invoking Thread.interrupt()
sets an internal interrupt status flag. The thread polls that flag using the Thread.interrupted()
method, which both returns true if the current thread has been interrupted and clears the interrupt status flag.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class StopSocket extends Thread { protected Socket s; public voidfinal run()class {Container implements Runnable try { private final Vector<Integer> vector s = new Socket("localhost",80Vector<Integer>(1000); public BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s.getInputStream()));Vector<Integer> getVector() { String s = nullreturn vector; } @Override public synchronized while((s = br.readLine()) != nullvoid run() { Random number = // blocks until end of stream (null)new Random(123L); int i } System.out.println("Blocked, will not get executed until some data is received. " + s= vector.capacity(); }catchwhile (IOException ie) { System.out.println("Performing cleanup"); } finally !Thread.interrupted() && i > 0) { Systemvector.outadd(number.println("Closing resources"); try { s.close(nextInt(100)); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); }i--; } } public void shutdown() throws IOException { if(s != null) s.close(); } } class Controller { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, IOException { StopSocketContainer ssc = new StopSocketContainer(); Thread tthread = new Thread(ssc); tthread.start(); Thread.sleep(10005000); ssthread.shutdowninterrupt(); } } |
A thread may use interruption for performing tasks other than cancellation and shutdown. Consequently, a thread should be interrupted only when its interruption policy is known in advance. Failure to do so can result in failed interruption requests.
Risk Assessment
Trying to force thread shutdown can lead to Forcing a thread to stop can result in inconsistent object state and thus corrupt the object. Critical resources may could also leak if cleanup operations are not carried out as required.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|
THI05-J |
Low |
Probable |
Medium |
P4 | L3 |
Automated Detection
...
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.THI05.THRD | Avoid calling unsafe deprecated methods of 'Thread' and 'Runtime' |
Related Guidelines
POS47-C. Do not use threads that can be canceled asynchronously | |
CWE-705, Incorrect Control Flow Scoping |
Android Implementation Details
On Android, Thread.stop()
was deprecated in API level 1.
Bibliography
[API 2006] | Class |
Section 24.3, "Stopping a Thread" | |
Chapter 7, "Cancellation and Shutdown" | |
Section 2.4, "Two Approaches to Stopping a Thread" | |
Concurrency Utilities, More information: Java Thread Primitive Deprecation | |
[JPL 2006] | Section 14.12.1, "Don't Stop" |
[Sun 1999] |
...
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[API 06|AA. Java References#API 06]\] Class Thread, method {{stop}}
\[[Darwin 04|AA. Java References#Darwin 04]\] 24.3 Stopping a Thread
\[[JDK7 08|AA. Java References#JDK7 08]\] Concurrency Utilities, More information: Java Thread Primitive Deprecation
\[[JPL 05|AA. Java References#JPL 05]\] 14.12.1. Don't stop |
CON34-J. Avoid deadlock by requesting fine-grained locks in the proper order 08. Concurrency (CON) 08. Concurrency (CON)