The wait()
, wait_for()
, and wait_until()
member functions of the std::condition_variable
class temporarily cede possession of a mutex so that other threads that may be requesting the mutex can proceed. These functions must always be called from code that is protected by locking a mutex. The waiting thread resumes execution only after it has been notified, generally as the result of the invocation of the notify_one()
or notify_all()
member functions invoked by another thread.
The wait()
function must be invoked from a loop that checks whether a condition predicate holds. A condition predicate is an expression constructed from the variables of a function that must be true for a thread to be allowed to continue execution. The thread pauses execution , via wait()
, wait_for()
, wait_until()
, or some other mechanism, and is resumed later, presumably when the condition predicate is true and the thread is notified.
Code Block |
---|
#include <condition_variable>
#include <mutex>
extern bool until_finish(void);
extern std::mutex m;
extern std::condition_variable condition;
void func(void) {
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(m);
while (until_finish()) { // Predicate does not hold.
condition.wait(lk);
}
// Resume when condition holds.
// . . .
} |
The notification mechanism notifies the waiting thread and allows it to check its condition predicate. The invocation of notify_all()
in another thread cannot precisely determine which waiting thread will be resumed. Condition predicate statements allow notified threads to determine whether they should resume upon receiving the notification.
...
This thread pauses execution using wait()
and resumes when notified, presumably when the list has elements to be consumed. It is possible for the thread to be notified even if the list is still empty, perhaps because the notifying thread used notify_all()
, which notifies all threads. Notification using notify_all()
is frequently preferred over using notify_one()
. (see See CON55-CPP. Preserve thread safety and liveness when using condition variables for more information.).
Note that a condition A condition predicate is typically the negation of the condition expression in the loop. In this noncompliant code example, the condition predicate for removing an element from a linked list is (list->next != nullptr)
, whereas the condition expression for the while
loop condition is (list->next == nullptr)
.
...
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <condition_variable> #include <mutex> struct Node { void *node; struct Node *next; }; static Node list; static std::mutex m; static std::condition_variable condition; void consume_list_element(std::condition_variable &condition) { std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(m); if (list.next == nullptr) { condition.wait(lk); } // Proceed when condition holds. } |
Compliant Solution (Explicit loop with predicate)
This compliant solution calls the wait()
member function from within a while
loop to check the condition both before and after the call to wait()
:.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <condition_variable> #include <mutex> struct Node { void *node; struct Node *next; }; static Node list; static std::mutex m; static std::condition_variable condition; void consume_list_element() { std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(m); while (list.next == nullptr) { condition.wait(lk); } // Proceed when condition holds. } |
Compliant Solution (Implicit loop with lambda predicate)
The std::condition_variable::wait()
function has an overload which overloaded form that accepts a function object representing the predicate. This overload form of wait()
behaves as if it were implemented as: as while (!pred()) wait(lock);
. This compliant solution uses a lambda as a predicate and passes it to the wait()
function. Note that the The predicate is expected to return true when it is safe to proceed, which reverses the predicate logic from the compliant solution using an explicit loop predicate.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <condition_variable> #include <mutex> struct Node { void *node; struct Node *next; }; static Node list; static std::mutex m; static std::condition_variable condition; void consume_list_element() { std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(m); condition.wait(lk, []{ return !list.next; }); // Proceed when condition holds. } |
Risk Assessment
Failure to enclose calls to the wait()
, wait_for()
, or wait_until()
member functions inside a while
loop can lead to indefinite blocking and denial of service (DoS).
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON54-CPP | Low | Unlikely | Medium | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar |
| LANG.STRUCT.ICOL | Inappropriate Call Outside Loop | ||||||
Helix QAC |
| C++5019 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| CERT.CONC.WAKE_IN_LOOP | |||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_CPP-CON54-a | Wrap functions that can spuriously wake up in a loop | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| CERT C++: CON54-CPP | Checks for situations where functions that can spuriously wake up are not wrapped in loop |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | 7.17.7.4, "The atomic_compare_exchange Generic Functions" |
[Lea 2000] | 1.3.2, "Liveness" |
...
...