...
Reflection
...
enables
...
a
...
Java
...
program
...
to
...
analyze
...
and
...
modify
...
itself.
...
In
...
particular,
...
a
...
program
...
can
...
discover the
...
values
...
of
...
field
...
variables
...
and
...
change
...
them
...
...
2005],
...
[Sun 2002]. The Java reflection API includes a method that enables fields that are normally inaccessible to be accessed under reflection. The following code prints out the names and values of all fields of an object someObject of class SomeClass:
| Code Block |
|---|
02|AA. Bibliography#Sun 02]\]. The Java reflection API includes a method call that enables fields that are not normally accessible to be accessed under reflection. The following code prints out the names and values of all fields of an object {{someObject}} of class {{SomeClass}}: {code} Field fields[] = SomeClass.class.getDeclaredFields(); for (Field field : fields) { if ( !Modifier.isPublic (field.getModifiers()) ) { field.setAccessible (true); } System.out.print("Field: " + field.getName()); System.out.println(", value: " + field.get(someObject)); } {code} |
A
...
field
...
could
...
be
...
set
...
to
...
a
...
new
...
value
...
as
...
follows:
| Code Block |
|---|
{code} String newValue = reader.readLine(); field.set(someObject, returnValue(newValue, field.getType())); {code} When the default security manager is used, it prevents fields that would not normally be accessible from being accessed under reflection. The default security manager throws a {{ |
When the default security manager is used, it prevents fields that are normally inaccessible from being accessed under reflection. The default security manager throws a java.security.AccessControlException
...
in
...
these
...
circumstances.
...
However,
...
java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission
...
can
...
be
...
granted
...
with
...
action
...
suppressAccessChecks
...
to
...
override
...
this
...
default
...
behavior.
...
For
...
example, the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) normally protects private members of a class from being accessed by an object of a different class. When a method uses reflection to access class members (that is, uses the APIs belonging to the java.lang.reflect
...
package), the reflection uses the same restrictions. That is, a foreign object that cannot access private members of a class normally also cannot use reflection to access those members. However, a class with private members but also with a public method that uses reflection to indirectly access those members can inadvertently enable a foreign object to access those private members using the public method, bypassing the intended accessibility restrictions. Consequently, unwary programmers can create an opportunity for a privilege escalation attack by untrusted callers.
The following table lists the APIs that should be used with care [SCG 2009].
APIs That Mirror Language Checks |
|---|
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
Because
...
the setAccessible() and getAccessible() methods of class java.lang.reflect.Field are used to instruct the JVM to override the language access checks, they perform standard (and more restrictive) security manager checks and consequently lack the vulnerability discussed in this rule. Nevertheless, these methods should be used only with extreme caution. The remaining set*() and get*() field reflection methods perform only the language access checks and are vulnerable.
Use of reflection complicates security analysis and can easily introduce security vulnerabilities. Consequently, programmers should avoid using the reflection APIs when it is feasible to do so. Exercise extreme caution when the use of reflection is necessary.
In particular, reflection must not be used to provide access to classes, methods, and fields unless those items are already accessible without the use of reflection. For example, the use of reflection to access or modify fields is not allowed unless those fields are already accessible and modifiable by other means, such as through getter and setter methods.
This rule is similar to MET04-J. Do not increase the accessibility of overridden or hidden methods, but it warns against using reflection, rather than inheritance, to subvert accessibility.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the private fields i and j can be modified using reflection via a Field object. Furthermore, any class can modify these fields using reflection via the zeroField() method. However, only class FieldExample can modify these fields without the use of reflection.
Allowing hostile code to pass arbitrary field names to the zeroField() method can
- Leak information about field names by throwing an exception for invalid or inaccessible field names (see ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information for additional information). This example complies with ERR01-J by catching the relevant exceptions at the end of the method.
- Access potentially sensitive data that is visible to
zeroField()but is hidden from the attacking method. This privilege escalation attack can be difficult to find during code review because the specific field or fields being accessed are controlled by strings in the attacker's code rather than by locally visible source code.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
}} {{setAccessible}} and {{getAccessible}} methods are used to instruct the JVM to override the language access checks, they perform standard (and more restrictive) security manager checks and consequently lack the vulnerability discussed in this rule. Nevertheless, these methods should be used only with extreme caution. The remaining {{set*()}} and {{get*()}} field reflection methods perform only the language access checks and consequently are vulnerable. Use of reflection complicates security analysis and can introduce substantial security vulnerabilities. Consequently, programmers should avoid the use of the reflection APIs when it is feasible to do so. When use of reflection is necessary, exercise extreme caution. In particular, reflection must not be used to provide access to classes, methods, and fields unless these items are already accessible without use of reflection. For example, use of reflection to access or modify fields is not allowed unless those fields are already accessible and modifiable by other means, such as through getter and setter methods. This rule is similar to [MET04-J. Do not increase the accessibility of overridden or hidden methods], but it warns against using reflection, rather than inheritance, to subvert accessibility. h2. Noncompliant Code Example In this noncompliant code example, the private fields {{i}} and {{j}} can be modified using reflection using a {{Field}} object. Furthermore, any class can modify these fields using reflection via the {{zeroField()}} method. However, only class {{FieldExample}} can modify these fields without the use of reflection. Allowing hostile code to pass arbitrary field names to the {{zeroField()}} method can * leak information about field names by throwing an exception for invalid or inaccessible field names. See rule [ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information] for additional information. This example complies with that rule by catching the relevant exceptions at the end of the method. * access potentially sensitive data that is visible to {{zeroField()}} but is hidden from the attacking method. This privilege escalation attack can be difficult to find during code review because the specific field(s) being accessed are controlled by strings in the attacker's code rather than by locally visible source code. {code:bgColor=#FFcccc} class FieldExample { private int i = 3; private int j = 4; public String toString() { return "FieldExample: i=" + i + ", j=" + j; } public void zeroI() { this.i = 0; } public void zeroField(String fieldName) { try { Field f = this.getClass().getDeclaredField(fieldName); // Subsequent access to field f passes language access checks // because makeAccessiblezeroField() could have accessed the field via // ordinary field references f.setInt(this, 0); // logLog appropriately or throw sanitized exception; see EXC06-J } catch (NoSuchFieldException ex) { // reportReport to handler } catch (IllegalAccessException ex) { // reportReport to handler } } public static void main(String[] args) { FieldExample fe = new FieldExample(); System.out.println(fe.toString()); for (String arg : args) { fe.zeroField(arg); System.out.println(fe.toString()); } } } {code} h2. Compliant Solution |
Compliant Solution (Private)
...
When you must use reflection,
...
make
...
sure
...
that
...
the
...
immediate
...
caller
...
(method)
...
is
...
isolated
...
from
...
hostile
...
code
...
by
...
declaring
...
it
...
private
...
or
...
final,
...
as
...
in
...
this
...
compliant solution:
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
solution. {code:bgColor=#ccccff} class FieldExample { // ... private void zeroField(String fieldName) { // ... } } {code} |
Note
...
that
...
when
...
language
...
access
...
checks
...
are
...
overridden using java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible
...
,
...
the
...
immediate
...
caller
...
gains
...
access
...
even
...
to
...
the
...
private
...
fields
...
of
...
other
...
classes. To ensure that the security manager will block attempts to access private fields of other classes, never grant the permission ReflectPermission with action suppressAccessChecks.
Compliant Solution (Nonreflection)
When a class must use reflection to provide access to fields, it must also provide the same access using a nonreflection interface. This compliant solution provides limited setter methods that grant every caller the ability to zero out its fields without using reflection. If these setter methods comply with all other rules or security policies, the use of reflection also complies with this rule.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Consequently, never grant the permission {{ReflectPermission}} with action {{suppressAccessChecks}} so that the security manager will block attempts to access private fields of other classes. h2. Compliant Solution (Non-Reflection) When a class must use reflection to provide access to fields, it must also provide the same access using a non-reflection interface. This compliant solution provides limited setter methods that grant all callers the ability to zero out its fields without using reflection. If these setter methods comply with all other rules or security policies, the use of reflection also complies with this rule. {code:bgColor=#ccccff} class FieldExample { // ... public void zeroField(String fieldName) { // ... } public void zeroI() { this.i = 0; } public void zeroJ() { this.ij = 0; } } {code} h2. Noncompliant Code Example In this noncompliant code example, the programmer intends that code outside the package is prevented from creating a new instance of an arbitrary class. Consequently, the {{Trusted}} class uses a package-private constructor. However, because the API is public, an attacker can pass {{Trusted.class}} itself as a parameter to the {{create()}} method and bypass the language access checks that prevent code outside the package from invoking the package-private constructor. The {{create()}} method returns an unauthorized instance of the {{Trusted}} class. {code:bgColor=#FFcccc} |
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the programmer intends that code outside the Safe package should be prevented from creating a new instance of an arbitrary class. Consequently, the Trusted class uses a package-private constructor. However, because the API is public, an attacker can pass Trusted.class itself as an argument to the create() method and bypass the language access checks that prevent code outside the package from invoking the package-private constructor. The create() method returns an unauthorized instance of the Trusted class.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
package Safe;
public class Trusted {
Trusted() { } // package Package-private constructor
public static <T> T create(Class<T> c)
throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
return c.newInstance();
}
}
{code}
{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
package Attacker;
import Safe.Trusted;
public class Attack {
public static void main(String[] args)
throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
System.out.println(Trusted.create(Trusted.class)); // succeedsSucceeds
}
}
{code}
|
In
...
the
...
presence
...
of
...
a
...
security
...
manager
...
s
...
,
...
the
...
Class.newInstance()
...
method
...
throws
...
a
...
security
...
exception
...
when (a) s.checkMemberAccess(this,
...
Member.PUBLIC)
...
denies
...
creation
...
of
...
new
...
instances
...
of
...
this
...
class
...
or
...
(b) the
...
caller's
...
class
...
loader
...
is
...
not
...
the
...
same
...
class loader or
...
an
...
ancestor
...
of
...
the
...
class
...
loader
...
for
...
the
...
current
...
class
...
, and
...
invocation
...
of
...
s.checkPackageAccess()
...
denies
...
access
...
to
...
the
...
package
...
of
...
this
...
class.
...
The
...
checkMemberAccess
...
method
...
allows
...
access to public members and classes that have the same class loader as the caller. However, the class loader comparison is often insufficient; for example, all applets share the same class loader by convention, consequently allowing a malicious applet to pass the security check in this case.
Compliant Solution (Access Reduction)
This compliant solution reduces the access of the create() method to package-private, preventing a caller from outside the package from using that method to bypass the language access checks to create an instance of the Trusted class. Any caller that can create a Trusted class instance using reflection can simply call the Trusted() constructor instead.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
to {{PUBLIC}} members and classes that have the same class loader as the caller. However, the class loader comparison is often insufficient; for example, all applets share the same class loader by convention, consequently allowing a malicious applet to pass the security check in this case. h2. Compliant Solution (Access Reduction) This compliant solution reduces the access of the {{create()}} method to package-private. As a result, any caller that can create a {{Trusted}} class using reflection could also simply call the {{Trusted}} constructor instead. {code:bgColor=#ccccff} package Safe; public class Trusted { Trusted() { } // package Package-private constructor static <T> T create(Class<T> c) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException { return c.newInstance(); } } {code} h2. Compliant Solution |
Compliant Solution (Security
...
Manager
...
Check)
...
This
...
compliant
...
solution
...
uses
...
the
...
getConstructors()
...
method
...
to
...
check
...
whether
...
the
...
class
...
provided
...
as
...
an
...
argument
...
has
...
public
...
constructors.
...
The
...
security
...
issue
...
is irrelevant
...
when
...
public
...
constructors
...
are
...
present
...
because
...
such
...
constructors
...
are
...
already
...
accessible
...
even
...
to
...
malicious
...
code.
...
When
...
public
...
constructors
...
are
...
absent,
...
the
...
create()
...
method
...
uses
...
the
...
security
...
manager's
...
checkPackageAccess()
...
method
...
to
...
ensure
...
that
...
all
...
callers
...
in
...
the
...
execution
...
chain
...
have
...
sufficient
...
permissions
...
to
...
access
...
classes
...
and
...
their
...
respective
...
members
...
defined
...
in
...
package
...
Safe
...
.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
=#ccccff} package Safe; import java.beans.Beans; import java.io.IOException; package Safe; public class Trusted { Trusted() { } public static <T> T create(Class<T> c) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException { if (c.getConstructors().length == 0) { // No public constructors SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager(); if (sm != null) { // throwsThrows an exception when access is not allowed sm.checkPackageAccess("Safe"); } } return c.newInstance(); // Safe to return } } {code} The drawback of this compliant solution is that the class must be granted reflection permissions to permit the call to {{getConstructors()}}. {mc} // HIDDEN TEXT // code outside the package package Attacker |
The disadvantage of this compliant solution is that the class must be granted reflection permissions to permit the call to getConstructors().
Compliant Solution (java.beans Package)
This compliant solution uses the java.beans.Beans API to check whether the Class object being received has any public constructors:
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
public class Trusted { Trusted() { } ; import Safe.Trusted; public class Attack { public static <T> voidT maincreate(String[]Class<T> argsc) { Object o = Trusted.create(Trusted.class); } } {mc} h2. Compliant Solution ({{java.beans}} Package) This compliant solution uses the {{java.beans.Beans}} API to check whether the Class object being received has any public constructors. {code:bgColor=#ccccff} public class Trusted { Trusted() { } public static <T> T create(Class<T> c) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException { throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException { // Executes without exception only if there are public constructors ClassLoader cl = new SafeClassLoader(); Object b = Beans.instantiate(cl, c.getName()); return c.cast(b); // Executes without exception only if there are public constructors ClassLoader cl = new SafeClassLoader(); Object b = Beans.instantiate(cl, c.getName()); return c.cast(b); } } {code} The {{Beans.instantiate()}} method succeeds only when the class being instantiated has a public constructor; otherwise, it throws an {{IllegalAccessException}}. The method uses a class loader argument along with the name of the class to instantiate. Unlike the previous compliant solution, this approach avoids the need for any reflection permissions. h2. Risk Assessment Misuse of APIs that perform language access checks against the immediate caller only can break data encapsulation, leak sensitive information, or permit privilege escalation attacks. || Rule || Severity || Likelihood || Remediation Cost || Priority || Level || | SEC05-J | high | probable | medium | {color:red}{*}P12{*}{color} | {color:red}{*}L1{*}{color} | h2. Related Guidelines | [Secure Coding Guidelines for the Java Programming Language, Version 3.0|http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/seccodeguide-139067.html] | Guideline 6-5 Be aware of standard APIs that perform Java language access checks against the immediate caller | h2. Bibliography | \[[Chan 1999|AA. Bibliography#Chan 99]\] | java.lang.reflect AccessibleObject | ---- [!The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_left.png!|SEC04-J. Protect sensitive operations with security manager checks] [!The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_up.png!|14. Platform Security (SEC)] [!The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_right.png!|SEC06-J. Do not rely on the default automatic signature verification provided by URLClassLoader and java.util.jar] } } |
The Beans.instantiate() method succeeds only when the class being instantiated has a public constructor; otherwise, it throws an IllegalAccessException. The method uses a class loader argument along with the name of the class to instantiate. Unlike the previous compliant solution, this approach avoids the need for any reflection permissions.
Related Vulnerabilities
CERT Vulnerability #636312 describes an exploit in Java that allows malicious code to disable any security manager currently in effect. Among other vulnerabilities, the attack code exploited the following method defined in sun.awt.SunToolkit, for Java 7:
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
public static Field getField(final Class klass, final String fieldName) {
return AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Field>() {
public Field run() {
try {
Field field = klass.getDeclaredField(fieldName);
assert (field != null);
field.setAccessible(true);
return field;
} catch (SecurityException e) {
assert false;
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
assert false;
}
return null;
}//run
});
}
|
This code operates inside a doPrivileged() block. It then uses the reflection method Class.getDeclaredField() to obtain a field given the field's class and name. This method would normally be blocked by a security manager. It then uses the reflection method Field.setAccessible() to make the field accessible, even if it were protected or private. But this method is public, so anyone can call it.
Risk Assessment
Misuse of APIs that perform language access checks only against the immediate caller can break data encapsulation, leak sensitive information, or permit privilege escalation attacks.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC05-J | High | Probable | Medium | P12 | L1 |
Automated Detection
| Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeSonar |
| JAVA.CLASS.ACCESS.BYPASS | Reflection Bypasses Member Accessibility (Java) | ||||||
| Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.SEC05.ARM | Avoid using reflection methods | ||||||
| SonarQube |
| Changing or bypassing accessibility is security-sensitive | |||||||
| SpotBugs |
| REFL_REFLECTION_INCREASES_ACCESSIBILITY_OF_CLASS | Implemented (since 4.5.0) |
Related Guidelines
Guideline 9-10 / ACCESS-10: Be aware of standard APIs that perform Java language access checks against the immediate caller |
Android Implementation Details
Reflection can be used on Android, so this rule is applicable. Also, the use of reflection may allow a developer to access private Android APIs and so requires caution.
Bibliography
|
...