...
Attempting to compile a program with a function declarator that does not include the appropriate type information typically generates a warning but does not prevent program compilation. These warnings should be resolved. (See recommendation MSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levels.)
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Non-Prototype-Format Declarators)
Noncompliant This noncompliant code example uses the identifier-list form for parameter declarations.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int max(a, b)
int a, b;
{
return a > b ? a : b;
}
|
Section Subclause 6.11 of the C99 standard, "Future language directions," states that "The .7 of the C Standard [ISO/IEC 9899:2011] states that "the use of function definitions with separate parameter identifier and declaration lists (not prototype-format parameter type and identifier declarators) is an obsolescent feature."
Compliant Solution (
...
Non-Prototype-Format Declarators)
In this compliant solution, int
is the type specifier, max(int a, int b)
is the function declarator, and the block within the curly braces is the function body.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int max(int a, int b) {
return a > b ? a : b;
}
|
...
Declaring a function without any prototype forces the compiler to assume that the correct number and type of parameters have been supplied to a function. This practice can result in unintended and undefined behavior.
In this noncompliant code example, the definition of func()
in file_a.c
expects three parameters but is supplied only two. :
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
/* file_a.c source file */
int func(int one, int two, int three){
printf("%d %d %d", one, two, three);
return 1;
}
|
However, because there is no prototype for func()
in file_b.c
, the compiler assumes that the correct number of arguments has been supplied and uses the next value on the program stack as the missing third argument.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
/* file_b.c source file */
func(1, 2);
|
C99 eliminated implicit function declarations from the C language \[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. Bibliography#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\]. However, many compilers still allow the compilation of programs containing implicitly declared functions, although they may issue a warning message. These warnings should be resolved. (See recommendation [MSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levels].) Wiki Markup
Compliant Solution (Function Prototypes)
This compliant solution correctly includes the function prototype for func()
in the compilation unit in which it is invoked, and the function invocation has been corrected to pass the right number of arguments.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
/* file_b.c source file */
int func(int, int, int);
func(1, 2, 3);
|
...
In this noncompliant code example, the function pointer fn_ptr
refers to the function add()
, which accepts three integer arguments. However, fn_ptr
is specified to accept two integer arguments. Setting fn_ptr
to refer to add()
results in unexpected program behavior. This example also violates the rule DCL35violates EXP37-C. Do not invoke a function using a type that does not match the function definition.Call functions with the correct number and type of arguments:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int add(int x, int y, int z) { return x + y + z; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int (*fn_ptr) (int, int); int res; fn_ptr = add; res = fn_ptr(2, 3); /* incorrectIncorrect */ /* ... */ return 0; } |
Compliant Solution (Function Pointers)
To correct this example, the declaration of fn_ptr
is changed to accept three arguments.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int add(int x, int y, int z) { return x + y + z; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int (*fn_ptr) (int, int, int) ; int res; fn_ptr = add; res = fn_ptr(2, 3, 4); /* ... */ return 0; } |
Risk Assessment
Failing to include type information for function declarators can result in unexpected or unintended program behavior.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL07-C |
Low |
Unlikely |
Low | P3 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|
Section |
---|
Section |
---|
21 S |
Section |
---|
Fully Implemented |
Astrée |
| function-prototype implicit-function-declaration | Partially checked | ||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-DCL07 | |||||||
CodeSonar |
| LANG.FUNCS.PROT LANG.STRUCT.DECL.IMPT | Incomplete function prototype Implicit Type | ||||||
| CC2.DCL07 | Fully implemented | |||||||
GCC |
|
Section |
---|
GCC |
Can detect violation of this recommendation when the | |||||||||
Helix QAC |
| C1304, C2050, C3331, C3335, C3408, C3450 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| MISRA.FUNC.PROT_FORM. |
Section |
---|
ECLAIR |
Section |
---|
decltype |
KR.2012 MISRA.FUNC.NOPROT.DEF MISRA.CAST.FUNC_PTR.2012 | |||||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 21 S | Fully implemented | ||||||
PC-lint Plus |
| 718, 746, 936, 9074 | Fully supported | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for:
Rec. fully covered. | |||||||
RuleChecker |
| function-prototype implicit-function-declaration | Partially checked | ||||||
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin |
| S819, S930 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
...
ISO/IEC TR 24772 "IHN Type system" and "OTR Subprogram Signature Mismatch"
MISRA Rule 8.2
Bibliography
...
TR 24772:2013 | Type System [IHN] Subprogram Signature Mismatch [OTR] |
ISO/IEC TS 17961 | Using a tainted value as an argument to an unprototyped function pointer [taintnoproto] |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 8.2 (required) |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | Subclause 6.11.7, "Function Definitions" |
[Spinellis 2006] | Section |
...
2.6.1, |
...
"Incorrect |
...
Routine |
...
or |
...
Arguments" |
...