Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Parasoft Jtest 2021.1

Mutable classes allow code external to the class to alter their instance or class fields. Provide means for creating copies of mutable classes so that disposable instances of such classes can be passed to untrusted code. This functionality is useful when methods in other classes must create copies of the particular class instance ; (see rules OBJ06-J. Defensively copy mutable inputs and mutable internal components and OBJ05-J. Defensively copy Do not return references to private mutable class members before returning their references for additional details).

Mutable classes must provide either a copy constructor or a public static factory method that returns a copy of an instance. Alternatively, final classes may advertise their copy functionality by overriding the clone() method of java.lang.Object. Use of the clone() method is secure only for final classes; nonfinal classes must not take this approach.

...

This compliant solution uses a copy constructor that initializes a MutableClass instance when an argument of the same type (or subtype) is passed to it.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public final class MutableClass { // Copy Constructorconstructor
  private final Date date;

  public MutableClass(MutableClass mc)  {
    this.date = new Date(mc.date.getTime());
  }

  public MutableClass(Date d) {
    this.date = new Date(d.getTime());  // Make defensive copy
  }

  public Date getDate() {
    return (Date) date.clone(); // Copy and return
  }
}

...

This compliant solution exports a public static factory method getInstance() that creates and returns a copy of a given MutableClass object instance.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
class MutableClass {
  private final Date date;

  private MutableClass(Date d) { // Noninstantiable and nonsubclassable
    this.date = new Date(d.getTime());  // Make defensive copy
  }

  public Date getDate() {
    return (Date) date.clone(); // Copy and return
  }

  public static MutableClass getInstance(MutableClass mc)  {
    return new MutableClass(mc.getDate());
  }
}

...

This compliant solution provides the needed copy functionality by declaring MutableClass to be final, implementing the Cloneable interface, and providing an Object.clone() method that performs a deep copy of the object.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public final class MutableClass implements Cloneable {
  private Date date;

  public MutableClass(Date d) {
    this.date = new Date(d.getTime());
  }

  public Date getDate() {
    return (Date) date.clone();
  }

  public void setDate(Date d) {
    this.date = (Date) d.clone();
  }

  public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
    final MutableClass cloned = (MutableClass) super.clone();
    cloned.date = (Date) date.clone();  // manuallyManually copy mutable Date object
    return cloned;
  }
}

...

Mutable classes that define a clone() method must be declared final. This ensures that to ensure that untrusted code cannot declare a subclass that overrides the clone() method to create a spurious instance. The clone() method should copy all internal mutable state as necessary — in necessary—in this compliant example, the Date object.

When untrusted code can call accessor methods passing mutable arguments, create defensive copies of the arguments before they are stored in any instance fields . See rule (see OBJ06-J. Defensively copy mutable inputs and mutable internal components for additional information). When retrieving internal mutable state, make a defensive copy of that state before returning it to untrusted code . See rule (see OBJ05-J. Defensively copy Do not return references to private mutable class members before returning their references for additional information).

Defensive copies would be unnecessary if untrusted code always invoked an object's clone() method on mutable state received from mutable classes and operated only on the cloned copy. Unfortunately, untrusted code has little incentive to do so, and malicious code has every incentive to misbehave. This compliant solution provides a clone() method to trusted code and also guarantees that the state of the object cannot be compromised when the accessor methods are called directly from untrusted code.

Compliant Solution (clone() with

...

Final Members)

When a mutable class's instance fields are declared final and lack accessible copy methods, provide a clone() method, as shown in this compliant solution.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public final class MutableClass implements Cloneable {
  private final Date date; // final field

  public MutableClass(Date d) {
    this.date = new Date(d.getTime());  // Copy copy-in
  }

  public Date getDate() {
    return (Date) date.clone(); // copyCopy and return
  }

  public Object clone() {
    Date d = (Date) date.clone();
    MutableClass cloned = new MutableClass(d);
    return cloned;
  }
}

...

If cloning or copying a mutable object is infeasible or expensive, one alternative is to create an unmodifiable immutable view class. This class overrides mutable methods to throw an exception, protecting the mutable class.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
class UnmodifiableDateView extends Date {
  private Date date;

  public UnmodifiableDateView(Date date) {
    this.date = date;
  }

  public void setTime(long date) {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  // Override all other mutator methods to throw UnsupportedOperationException
}

public final class MutableClass {
  private Date date;

  public MutableClass(Date d) {
    this.date = d;
  }

  public void setDate(Date d) {
    this.date = (Date) d.clone();
  }

  public UnmodifiableDateView getDate() {
    return new UnmodifiableDateView(date);
  }
}

Exceptions

OBJ04-J-EX0: Sensitive classes should not be cloneable, per rule OBJ07-J. Sensitive classes must not let themselves be copied.

...

Creating a mutable class without providing copy functionality can result in the data of its instance becoming corrupted when the instance is passed to untrusted code.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

OBJ04-J

low

Low

likely

Likely

medium

Medium

P6

L2

Automated Detection

Sound automated detection is infeasible in the general case. Heuristic approaches could be useful.

Tool
Version
Checker
Description
CodeSonar4.2

FB.MALICIOUS_CODE.EI_EXPOSE_REP

FB.MALICIOUS_CODE.EI_EXPOSE_REP2

May expose internal representation by returning reference to mutable object

May expose internal representation by incorporating reference to mutable object

Coverity7.5

FB.EI_EXPOSE_REP2
FB.EI_EXPOSE_REP

Implemented
Parasoft Jtest
Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V
CERT.OBJ04.CLONE
CERT.OBJ04.CPCL
CERT.OBJ04.MPT
CERT.OBJ04.SMO
CERT.OBJ04.MUCOP
Make your 'clone()' method "final" for security
Enforce returning a defensive copy in 'clone()' methods
Do not pass user-given mutable objects directly to certain types
Do not store user-given mutable objects directly into variables
Provide mutable classes with copy functionality

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE

CWE-374

.

, Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

 


CWE-375

.

, Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

Secure Coding Guidelines for

the

Java

Programming Language

SE, Version

3

5.0

Guideline

2-3.

6-4 / MUTABLE-4: Support copy functionality for a mutable class

Bibliography

[API

2006

2014]

Method clone()

[Bloch 2008]

Item 39

. Make defensive copies when needed, Item 11. Override clone judiciously

, "Make Defensive Copies When Needed"
Item 11, "Override Clone Judiciously"

[Security 2006]

...



...

Image Modified Image Modified Image Modified