Increasing the accessibility of overridden or hidden methods permits a malicious subclass to offer wider access to the restricted method than was originally intended. Consequently, programs must override methods only when necessary and must declare methods final whenever possible to prevent malicious subclassing. When methods cannot be declared final, programs must refrain from increasing the accessibility of overridden methods.
Wiki Markup |
---|
According to \[[JLS Section 8.4.8.3, Requirements in Overriding and Hiding|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.4.8.3]\]: |
"The access modifier of an overriding or hiding method must provide at least as much access as the overridden or hidden method , or a compile-time error occurs."
The allowed accesses are:
(The Java Language Specification, §8.4.8.3, "Requirements in Overriding and Hiding" [JLS 2015]). The following table lists the allowed accesses.
Overridden/Hidden Method Modifier | Overriding/Hiding Method Modifier |
---|
Overridden/hidden method modifier
|
|
|
|
default | default or |
| |
| Cannot |
...
be overridden |
...
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example exemplifies demonstrates how a malicious subclass Sub
can both override the doLogic()
method of the superclass and increase the accessibility of the super classoverriding method. Any user of Sub
will be able to can invoke the doLogic
method since because the base class BadScope
defined it with the protected
access modifier. The class Sub
can allow more access than BadScope
by using the public
modifier Super
defines it to be protected
, consequently allowing class Sub
to increase the accessibility of doLogic()
by declaring its own version of the method to be public.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class BadScopeSuper { publicprotected void doLogic() { System.out.println("Super invoked"); } } public class Sub extends BadScopeSuper { public void doLogic() { System.out.println("Sub invoked"); //do Do restrictivesensitive operations } } |
Compliant Solution
Do not override a method unless absolutely necessary. Declare all methods and fields final
to avoid malicious subclassing. This is in compliance with the tenets of OBJ31-J. Do not use public static non-final variables and OBJ00-J. Declare data members private.This compliant solution declares the doLogic()
method final to prevent malicious overriding:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class BadScopeSuper { privateprotected final void doLogic() { // Declare as final System.out.println("Super invoked"); // Do sensitive operations } } |
Exceptions
MET04-J-EX0: For classes that implement the java.lang.Cloneable
interface, the accessibility of the Object.clone()
method should be increased from protected
to public
[SCG 2009].
Risk Assessment
Subclassing allows weakening of access restrictions to be weakened, possibly compromising , which can compromise the security of a Java application.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|
MET04-J |
Medium |
Probable |
Medium | P8 | L2 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
...
Detecting violations of this rule is straightforward.
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.MET04.OPM | Do not override an instance "private" method |
Related Guidelines
CWE-487, Reliance on Package-Level Scope | |
Guideline 4-1 / EXTEND-1: Limit the accessibility of classes, interfaces, methods, and fields |
Bibliography
...
...
...
...
...
Hiding|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.4.8.3] \[[MITRE 09|AA. Java References#MITRE 09]\] [CWE ID 487|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/487.html] "Reliance on Package-level Scope"SCP00-J. Use as minimal scope as possible for all variables and methods 03. Scope (SCP) SCP02-J. Use nested classes carefully