Many library functions accept a string or wide string argument with the constraint that the string they receive is properly null-terminated. Passing a character sequence or wide character sequence that is not null-terminated to such a function can result in accessing memory that is outside the bounds of the object. Do not pass a character sequence or wide character sequence that is not null-terminated to a library function that expects a string or wide string argument.
Noncompliant Code Example
This code example is noncompliant because the character sequence c_str
will not be null-terminated when passed as an argument to printf().
(See STR11-C. Do not specify the bound of a character array initialized with a string literal on how to properly initialize character arrays.)
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h>
void func(void) {
char c_str[3] = "abc";
printf("%s\n", c_str);
}
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution does not specify the bound of the character array in the array declaration. If the array bound is omitted, the compiler allocates sufficient storage to store the entire string literal, including the terminating null character.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h>
void func(void) {
char c_str[] = "abc";
printf("%s\n", c_str);
} |
Noncompliant Code Example
This code example is noncompliant because the wide character sequence cur_msg
will not be null-terminated when passed to wcslen()
. This will occur if lessen_memory_usage()
is invoked while cur_msg_size
still has its initial value of 1024.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <wchar.h>
wchar_t *cur_msg = NULL;
size_t cur_msg_size = 1024;
size_t cur_msg_len = 0;
void lessen_memory_usage(void) {
wchar_t *temp;
size_t temp_size;
/* ... */
if (cur_msg != NULL) {
temp_size = cur_msg_size / 2 + 1;
temp = realloc(cur_msg, temp_size * sizeof(wchar_t));
/* temp &and cur_msg may no longer be null-terminated */
if (temp == NULL) {
/* Handle error */
}
cur_msg = temp;
cur_msg_size = temp_size;
cur_msg_len = wcslen(cur_msg);
}
} |
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, cur_msg
will always be null-terminated when passed to wcslen()
:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <wchar.h>
wchar_t *cur_msg = NULL;
size_t cur_msg_size = 1024;
size_t cur_msg_len = 0;
void lessen_memory_usage(void) {
wchar_t *temp;
size_t temp_size;
/* ... */
if (cur_msg != NULL) {
temp_size = cur_msg_size / 2 + 1;
temp = realloc(cur_msg, temp_size * sizeof(wchar_t));
/* temp and cur_msg may no longer be null-terminated */
if (temp == NULL) {
/* Handle error */
}
cur_msg = temp;
/* Properly null-terminate cur_msg */
cur_msg[temp_size - 1] = L'\0';
cur_msg_size = temp_size;
cur_msg_len = wcslen(cur_msg);
}
} |
Noncompliant Code Example (strncpy()
)
Although the strncpy()
function takes a string as input, it does not guarantee that the resulting value is still null-terminated. In the following noncompliant code example, if no null character is contained in the first n
characters of the source
array, the result will not be null-terminated. Passing a non-null-terminated character sequence to strlen()
is undefined behavior.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <string.h>
enum { STR_SIZE = 32 };
size_t func(const char *source) {
char c_str[STR_SIZE];
size_t ret = 0;
if (source) {
c_str[sizeof(c_str) - 1] = '\0';
strncpy(c_str, source, sizeof(c_str));
ret = strlen(c_str);
} else {
/* Handle null pointer */
}
return ret;
}
|
Compliant Solution (Truncation)
This compliant solution is correct if the programmer's intent is to truncate the string:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <string.h>
enum { STR_SIZE = 32 };
size_t func(const char *source) {
char c_str[STR_SIZE];
size_t ret = 0;
if (source) {
strncpy(c_str, source, sizeof(c_str) - 1);
c_str[sizeof(c_str) - 1] = '\0';
ret = strlen(c_str);
} else {
/* Handle null pointer */
}
return ret;
} |
Compliant Solution (Truncation, strncpy_s())
The C Standard, Annex K strncpy_s()
function can also be used to copy with truncation. The strncpy_s()
function copies up to n
characters from the source array to a destination array. If no null character was copied from the source array, then the n
th position in the destination array is set to a null character, guaranteeing that the resulting string is null-terminated.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
#include <string.h>
enum { STR_SIZE = 32 };
size_t func(const char *source) {
char c_str[STR_SIZE];
size_t ret = 0;
if (source) {
errno_t err = strncpy_s(
c_str, sizeof(c_str), source, strnlen(source, sizeof(c_str))
);
if (err != 0) {
/* Handle error */
} else {
ret = strnlen(c_str, sizeof(c_str));
}
} else {
/* Handle null pointer */
}
return ret;
}
|
Compliant Solution (Copy without Truncation)
If the programmer's intent is to copy without truncation, this compliant solution copies the data and guarantees that the resulting array is null-terminated. If the string cannot be copied, it is handled as an error condition.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <string.h>
enum { STR_SIZE = 32 };
size_t func(const char *source) {
char c_str[STR_SIZE];
size_t ret = 0;
if (source) {
if (strnlen(source, sizeof(c_str)) < sizeof(c_str)) {
strcpy(c_str, source);
ret = strlen(c_str);
} else {
/* Handle string-too-large */
}
} else {
/* Handle null pointer */
}
return ret;
} |
Note that this code is not bulletproof. It gracefully handles the case where source
is NULL, when it is a valid string, and when source
is not null-terminated, but at least the first 32 bytes are valid. However, in cases where source
is not NULL, but points to invalid memory, or any of the first 32 bytes are invalid memory, the first call to strnlen()
will access this invalid memory, and the resulting behavior is undefined. Unfortunately, standard C provides no way to prevent or even detect this condition without some external knowledge about the memory source
points to
Null-terminated byte strings are, by definition, null-terminated. String operations cannot determine the length or end of strings that are not properly null-terminated, which can consequently result in buffer overflows and other undefined behavior.
...
Exception
An exception to this rule applies if the intent of the programmer is to convert a null-terminated byte string to a character array. To be compliant with this standard, this intent must be clearly stated in comments.
Risk Assessment
Failure to properly null terminate null-terminated byte strings -terminate a character sequence that is passed to a library function that expects a string can result in buffer overflows and the execution of arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process by an attacker. Null-termination errors can also result in unintended information disclosure.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
STR32-C |
3 (high)
2 (probable)
2 (medium)
P12
High | Probable | Medium | P12 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| Supported Astrée supports the implementation of library stubs to fully verify this guideline. | |||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-STR32 | Partially implemented: can detect some violation of the rule | ||||||
CodeSonar |
| MISC.MEM.NTERM.CSTRING | Unterminated C String | ||||||
Compass/ROSE | Can detect some violations of this rule | ||||||||
Coverity |
| STRING_NULL | Fully implemented | ||||||
Helix QAC |
| DF2835, DF2836, DF2839 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| NNTS.MIGHT | |||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 404 S, 600 S | Partially implemented | ||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-STR32-a | Avoid overflow due to reading a not zero terminated string | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for:
Rule partially covered. | |||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V692 | |||||||
TrustInSoft Analyzer |
| match format and arguments | Partially verified. |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
...
Related Guidelines
(Section under construction by Ciera. Just wanted to get some current notes down here before I clean it up.)
Static Analysis
Assume all in parameters require NT, all out params provide NT.
Write specialized handlers for any function where this is not the case (should not be too many. Default should be that strings are NT as soon as possible.)
O represents open strings, M represents maybe case (top of lattice).
Local analysis. Make sure we meet our own handler requirements, too.
Few false positives, as those that accept NT are specified. Probably will still get some FP from pointer magic.
Consider affects on STR03-A, STR07-A, and STR31-C
Combined attack (SA/DA/T)
Static analysis to generate test cases, dynamic analysis instruments the code that the test cases run on. Will have slightly different tradeoffs to SA. Good if we don't know the codebase well enough to create the handlers for non-NT functions. More work up front to create this kind of analysis, but reusable to many codebases. Provides the breadth of static analysis, the preciseness of dynamic analysis, and the repeatability of testing. Will have to think through this algorithm more carefully.
Rejected Strategies
Testing
It would probably be prohibitively expensive to come up with the test cases by hand.
Dynamic Analysis
It seems the analysis won't be very different from the static analysis, in which case, we should just do this statically.
Inspection
An inspection would essentially grep for known problem functions and inspect the usage. Obviously, this is extremely costly, as there would be a lot of false positives, and this does not scale well. There may also be many false negatives. Say Dev A inspects a function that returns an open string. Dev A considers it ok and documents it as such, perhaps this is one of the exception cases. Dev B might be inspecting another part of the code and might not realize that Dev A allowed an open string. It might be documented, but this is not very reliable. This might lead to a false sense of confidence that since the developers hand inspected every case that the code is fine, when in fact, a miscommunication can cause a defect.
References
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|---|---|
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | String Termination [CMJ] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
ISO/IEC TS 17961:2013 | Passing a non-null-terminated character sequence to a library function that expects a string [strmod] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
CWE 2.11 | CWE-119, Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer | 2017-05-18: CERT: Rule subset of CWE |
CWE 2.11 | CWE-123, Write-what-where Condition | 2017-06-12: CERT: Partial overlap |
CWE 2.11 | CWE-125, Out-of-bounds Read | 2017-05-18: CERT: Rule subset of CWE |
CWE 2.11 | CWE-170, Improper Null Termination | 2017-06-13: CERT: Exact |
CERT-CWE Mapping Notes
Key here for mapping notes
CWE-119 and STR32-C
Independent( ARR30-C, ARR38-C, ARR32-C, INT30-C, INT31-C, EXP39-C, EXP33-C, FIO37-C) STR31-C = Subset( Union( ARR30-C, ARR38-C)) STR32-C = Subset( ARR38-C)
CWE-119 = Union( STR32-C, list) where list =
- Out-of-bounds reads or writes that do not involve non-null-terminated byte strings.
CWE-125 and STR32-C
Independent( ARR30-C, ARR38-C, EXP39-C, INT30-C) STR31-C = Subset( Union( ARR30-C, ARR38-C)) STR32-C = Subset( ARR38-C)
CWE-125 = Union( STR32-C, list) where list =
- Out-of-bounds reads that do not involve non-null-terminated byte strings.
CWE-123 and STR32-C
Independent(ARR30-C, ARR38-C) STR31-C = Subset( Union( ARR30-C, ARR38-C)) STR32-C = Subset( ARR38-C)
Intersection( CWE-123, STR32-C) =
- Buffer overflow from passing a non-null-terminated byte string to a standard C library copying function that expects null termination, and that overwrites an (unrelated) pointer
STR32-C - CWE-123 =
- Buffer overflow from passing a non-null-terminated byte string to a standard C library copying function that expects null termination, but it does not overwrite an (unrelated) pointer
CWE-123 – STR31-C =
- Arbitrary writes that do not involve standard C library copying functions, such as strcpy()
Bibliography
[Seacord 2013] | Chapter 2, "Strings" |
[Viega 2005] | Section 5.2.14, "Miscalculated NULL Termination" |
...
\[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 7.1.1, "Definitions of terms," and Section 7.21, "String handling <string.h>"
\[[Seacord 05|AA. C References#Seacord 05]\] Chapter 2, "Strings"
\[[ISO/IEC TR 24731-2006|AA. C References#ISO/IEC TR 24731-2006]\] Section 6.7.1.4, "The strncpy_s function"
\[[Viega 05|AA. C References#Viega 05]\] Section 5.2.14, "Miscalculated null termination" Wiki Markup