Page History

Serialization can be used maliciously. Examples include using serialization to maliciously , for example, to violate the intended invariants of a class. Deserialization is equivalent to object construction; consequently, all invariants enforced during object construction must also be enforced during deserialization. The default serialized form lacks any enforcement of class invariants; consequently, it is forbidden to programs must not use the default serialized form for any class with implementation-defined invariants.

The deserialization process creates a new instance of the class without invoking any of the class's constructors. Consequently, any input validation checks present within the in constructors are bypassed. Moreover, transient and static fields may fail to reflect their true values because such fields are bypassed during the serialization procedure and consequently cannot be restored from the object stream. As a result, any class with that has transient fields , and any class or that performs validation checks in its constructors , must also perform similar valiation validation checks when being deserialized.

Validating deserialized objects helps confirm establishes that the object state is within defined limits and ensures that all transient and static fields have their default safe secure values. Fields However, fields that are declared final and contain with a constant value will contain the proper always be restored to the same constant value after deserialization, rather than the default value. For example, the value of the field private transient final n = 42 after deserialization will be 42 , rather than 0. Deserialization produces default values for all other cases.

Noncompliant Code Example (Singleton)

Wiki MarkupIn this noncompliant code example (based on \ [[Bloch 2005|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05]\]), a class with singleton semantics uses the default serialized form, which fails to enforce any implementation-defined invariants. Consequently, the malicious malicious code can create a second instance even though the class should have only a single instance. For purposes of this example, we assume that the class contains only nonsensitive data.

public class SingletonClassNumberData extends ExceptionNumber {
  public static final SingletonClass INSTANCE = new SingletonClass();
  private SingletonClass() {
    // Perform security checks and parameter validation// ... Implement abstract Number methods, like Number.doubleValue()...

  private static final NumberData INSTANCE = new NumberData ();
  public static NumberData getInstance() {
    return INSTANCE;
  }

  protectedprivate int printDataNumberData() {
    int // Perform security checks and parameter validation
  }

  protected int printData() {
    int data = 1000;
    // Print data
    return data;
  }
}

class Malicious {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    SingletonClassNumberData sc = (SingletonClassNumberData) deepCopy(SingletonClassNumberData.INSTANCEgetInstance());
    // Prints false; indicates new instance
    System.out.println(sc == SingletonClassNumberData.INSTANCE);  // Prints false; indicates new instancegetInstance());  
    System.out.println("Balance = " + sc.printData());
  }

  // This method should not be used in production quality code
  public static public Object deepCopy(Object obj) {
    try {
      ByteArrayOutputStream bos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
       new ObjectOutputStream(bos).writeObject(obj);
      ByteArrayInputStream bin =
          new ByteArrayInputStream(bos.toByteArray());
      return new ObjectInputStream(bin).readObject();
    } catch (Exception e) { 
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
    }
  }
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution adds a custom readResolve() method that replaces the deserialized instance with a reference to the appropriate singleton from the current execution. More complicated cases may also require custom writeObject() or readObject() methods in addition to (or instead of) the custom readResolve() method. Note that the custom serialization methods must be declared final to prevent a malicious subclass from overriding them.

More information on correctly handling singleton classes is available in the rule MSC16-J. Address the shortcomings of the Singleton design pattern.

public class SingletonClassNumberData extends ExceptionNumber {
  // ...
  privateprotected final Object readResolve() throws NotSerializableException {
    return INSTANCE;
  }
}

More information on singleton classes is available in MSC07-J. Prevent multiple instantiations of singleton objects.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example uses a custom-defined readObject() method , but fails to perform input validation after deserialization. The design of the system requires the maximum value ticket number of any lottery ticket to be 20,000 ; howeverand the minimum ticket number be greater than 0. However, an attacker can manipulate the serialized array to generate a different number on deserialization. Such a number could be greater than 20,000 or could be 0 or negative.

public class Lottery implements Serializable {	
  private int ticket = 1;
  private SecureRandom draw = new SecureRandom();

  public Lottery(int ticket) {
    this.ticket = (int) (Math.abs(ticket % 20000) + 1);
  }

  public int getTicket() {
    return this.ticket;	
  }

  public int roll() {
    this.ticket = (int) ((Math.abs(draw.nextInt()) % 20000) + 1);
    return this.ticket;
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    Lottery l = new Lottery(2);
    for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      l.roll();
      System.out.println(l.getTicket());
    }
  }

  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    in.defaultReadObject();
  }
}

Compliant Solution

Any input validation performed in the constructors must also be implemented at all places where wherever an object can be deserialized. This compliant solution performs field-by-field validation by reading all fields of the object using the readFields() and getField() methods method and ObjectInputStream.GetField constructor. The value for each field must be fully validated before it is assigned to the object under construction. For more complicated invariants, this validating before assignment may require reading multiple field values into local variables to enable checks that depend on combinations of field values.

public final class Lottery implements Serializable { 
  // ...
  private synchronized void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
                       throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    ObjectInputStream.GetField fields = s.readFields();
    int ticket = fields.get("ticket", 0);
    if (ticket > 20000 || ticket <= 0) {
      throw new InvalidObjectException("Not in range!");
    }
    // Validate draw
    this.ticket = ticket;
  }
}

Note that the class must also be declared final to prevent a malicious subclass from carrying out a finalizer attack . (See rule OBJ05see OBJ11-J. Prevent access to partially initialized objects.) Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions for more information about finalizer attacks). For extendable classes, an acceptable alternative is to use of a flag that indicates whether the instance is safe for use. The flag can be set after validation and must be checked in every method before any operation is performed.

Additionally, any transient or static fields must be explicitly set to an appropriate value within readObject().This compliant solution must also validate that draw is a secure random number generator. If an attacker made draw generate insufficiently random numbers, the attacker could control the future tickets generated by roll().

Note that this compliant solution is insufficient to protect sensitive data. See rule (see SER03-J. Prevent serialization of unencrypted, Do not serialize unencrypted sensitive data for additional information).

Compliant Solution (

...

Transient)

This compliant solution marks the fields as transient, so they are not serialized. The readObject() method initializes them using the roll() method. This class need not be final , as because its fields are private and cannot be tampered with by subclasses, and its methods have been declared final to prevent subclasses from overriding and ignoring them.

public class Lottery implements Serializable {	
  private transient int ticket = 1;
  private transient SecureRandom draw = new SecureRandom();

  public Lottery(int ticket) {
    this.ticket = (int) (Math.abs(ticket % 20000) + 1);
  }

  public final int getTicket() {
    return this.ticket;	
  }

  public final int roll() {
    this.ticket = (int) ((Math.abs(draw.nextInt()) % 20000) + 1);
    return this.ticket;
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    Lottery l = new Lottery(2);
    for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      l.roll();
      System.out.println(l.getTicket());
    }
  }

  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in)
          throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    in.defaultReadObject();
    this.draw = new SecureRandom();
    roll();
  }
}

Compliant Solution (

...

Nonserializable)

This compliant solution simply does not mark the Lottery class serializable.:

public final class Lottery {	
  // ...
}

Risk Assessment

Serializing objects with implementation defined characteristics can corrupt the state of the object.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography

Noncompliant Code Example (AtomicReferenceArray<>)

CVE-2012-0507 describes an exploit that managed to bypass Java's applet security sandbox and run malicious code on a remote user's machine. The exploit deserialized a malicious object that subverted Java's type system. The malicious object was an array of two objects. The second object, of type AtomicReferenceArray<>, contained an array, but this array was also the first object. This data structure could not be created without serialization because the array referenced by AtomicReferenceArray<> should be private. However, whereas the first object was an array of objects of type Help (which inherited from ClassLoader), the AtomicReferenceArray<>'s internal array type was Object, enabling the malicious code to use AtomicReferenceArray.set(ClassLoader) to create an object that was subsequently interpreted as being of type Help object with no cast necessary. A cast would have caught this type mismatch. This exploit allowed attackers to create their own ClassLoader object, which is forbidden by the applet security manager.

This exploit worked because, in Java versions prior to 1.7.0_02, the object of type AtomicReferenceArray<> performed no validation on its internal array.

public class AtomicReferenceArray<E> implements java.io.Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = -6209656149925076980L;

  // Rest of class...
  // No readObject() method, relies on default readObject
}

Compliant Solution (AtomicReferenceArray<>)

This exploit was mitigated in Java 1.7.0_03 by having the object of type AtomicReferenceArray<> validate its array upon deserialization. The readObject() method inspects the array contents, and if the array is of the wrong type, it makes a defensive copy of the array, foiling the exploit. This technique is recommended by OBJ06-J. Defensively copy mutable inputs and mutable internal components.

public class AtomicReferenceArray<E> implements java.io.Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = -6209656149925076980L;

  // Rest of class...

  /**
   * Reconstitutes the instance from a stream (that is, deserializes it).
   * @param s the stream
   */
  private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
    throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    // Note: This must be changed if any additional fields are defined
    Object a = s.readFields().get("array", null);
    if (a == null || !a.getClass().isArray())
      throw new java.io.InvalidObjectException("Not array type");
    if (a.getClass() != Object[].class)
      a = Arrays.copyOf((Object[])a, Array.getLength(a), Object[].class);
    unsafe.putObjectVolatile(this, arrayFieldOffset, a);
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Using the default serialized form for any class with implementation-defined invariants may result in the malicious tampering of class invariants.

Automated Detection

Related Guidelines

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedSER07-J. Make defensive copies of private mutable components during deserialization      16. Serialization (SER)      SER09-J. Minimize privileges before deserializing from a privileged context