Page History

Wiki MarkupAccording to the The Java Language Specification \[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], Section 12 (JLS), §12.4, "Initialization of Classes and Interfaces" [JLS 2005]:

Initialization of a class consists of executing its static initializers and the initializers for static fields (class variables) declared in the class.

Therefore, the presence of a static field triggers the initialization of a class. However, the initializer of a static field could depend on the initialization of another class, possibly creating an initialization cycle.

The JLS also states in §8. Wiki MarkupIn other words, the presence of a {{static}} field triggers the initialization of a class. However, a static field might depend on the initialization of a class, and might create an initialization cycle. The Java Language Specification also states: (\[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], Section 8.3.2.1, "Initializers for Class Variables" )[JLS 2005]:

At ...at run time, static variables that are final and that are initialized with compile-time constant values are initialized first.

While this statement typically holds, it can be misleading as it does not account for This statement does not apply to instances that use values of static final fields that are initialized at a later stage. Even when Declaring a field is to be static final , is insufficient to guarantee that it is not necessarily fully initialized before being read.

Programs in general should—and security-sensitive programs must—eliminate all class initialization cycles.

Noncompliant Code Example (

...

Intraclass Cycle)

This noncompliant code example contains an intra-class intraclass initialization cycle. :

public class Cycle {
  private final int balance;
  private static final Cycle c = new Cycle(); 
  private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit

  public Cycle() {
    balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance);	
  }
}

The Cycle() class declares a private static final class variable, which is initialized to a new instance of the Cycle() class. Static initializers are guaranteed to be invoked once at some point before the first use of a static class member or the first invocation of a constructor.

The programmer's intent is to calculate the account balance by subtracting the processing fee from the deposited amount. However, the initialization of the c class variable happens before the runtime initialization of the deposit field is initialized because it is appears lexically before the initialization of the deposit field. Consequently, the value of deposit seen by the constructor, when invoked during the static initialization of c, is the initial value of deposit (0) rather than the random value. As a result, the balance is always equal computed to be -10.

The JLS permits implementations to ignore the possibility of such recursive attempts \[[Bloch 2005|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05]\].  

Step 3 of the detailed initialized procedure described in JLS §12.4.2 [JLS 2014] permits implementations to ignore the possibility of such recursive initialization cycles.

Compliant Solution (Intraclass Cycle

...

)

This compliant solution changes the initialization order of the class Cycle so that the fields are initialized without creating any dependency cycles. Specifically, the initialization of c is placed lexically after the initialization of deposit so that it occurs temporally after deposit is fully initialized.

public class Cycle {
  private final int balance;
  private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit
  private static final Cycle c = new Cycle();  // Inserted after initialization of required fields
  public Cycle() {
    balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance);	
  }
}

Such initialization cycles become insidious when many fields are involved; , so it is important to ensure that the control flow lacks such cycles.

Although this compliant solution prevents the initialization cycle, it depends on declaration order and is consequently fragile; later maintainers of the software may be unaware that the declaration order must be maintained to preserve correctness. Consequently, such dependencies must be clearly documented in the code.

Noncompliant Code Example (

...

Interclass Cycle)

This noncompliant code example declares two classes with static variables whose values depend on each other. When seen together, the The cycle is obvious , but the cycle can be easily missed when the classes are viewed when the classes are seen together (as here) but is easy to miss when viewing the classes separately.

class A {
  public  static public final int a = B.b + 1;
    // ...
}

class B {
  public  static public final int b = A.a + 1;
    // ...
}

The initialization order of the classes can vary and consequently compute , causing computation of different values for A.a and B.b. When class A is initialized first, A.a will have the value 2, and B.b will have the value 1. These values will be reversed when class B is initialized first.

Compliant Solution (

...

Interclass Cycle)

This compliant solution breaks the inter-class interclass cycle by eliminating one of the dependencies.the dependency of A on B:

class A {
  public  static public final int a = 2;
    // ...
}

// class B unchanged: {
  public static final int b = A.a + 1;
  // ...
}

With the cycle broken, the initial values will always be A.a = 2 and B.b = 3 regardless of initialization order.

Noncompliant Code Example

The programmer in this noncompliant code example attempts to initialize a static variable in one class using a static method in a second class, but that method in turn relies on a static method in the first class:

class A {
  public static int a = B.b();
  public static int c() { return 1; }
}
 
class B {
  public static int b() { return A.c(); }
}

This code correctly initializes A.a to 1, using the Oracle JVM, regardless of initialization order.whether A or B is loaded first. However, the JLS does not guarantee A.a to be properly initialized. Furthermore, the initialization cycle makes this system harder to maintain and more likely to break in surprising ways when modified.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution moves the c() method into class B, breaking the cycle:

class A {
  public static int a = B.b();
}
 
class B {
  public static int b() { return B.c(); }
  public static int c() { return 1; }
}

Risk Assessment

Initialization cycles may lead to unexpected results.

Automated Detection

...

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.

Other Languages

...

Tool	Version	Checker	Description
CodeSonar	Include Page CodeSonar_V CodeSonar_V	JAVA.STRUCT.UA JAVA.STRUCT.UA.DEFAULT	Useless Assignment (Java) Useless Assignment to Default (Java)
Parasoft Jtest	Include Page Parasoft_V Parasoft_V	CERT.DCL00.ACD	Ensure that files do not contain cyclical dependencies
PVS-Studio	Include Page PVS-Studio_V PVS-Studio_V	V6050
SonarQube	Include Page SonarQube_V SonarQube_V	S2390	Classes should not access their own subclasses during initialization

Related Guidelines

...

Bibliography

Bibliography

...

...

...

...

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added Variables|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.3.2.1]; [12.4, Initialization of Classes and Interfaces|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/execution.html#12.4] Puzzle 49: Larger Than Life \[[MITRE 2009|AA. Bibliography#MITRE 09]\] [CWE ID 665|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/665.html] "Improper Initialization"MSC06-J. Avoid memory leaks      49. Miscellaneous (MSC)      DCL13-J. Avoid cyclic dependencies between packages