The conditional AND and OR operators (&&
and ||
, respectively) exhibit short-circuit behavior. That is, the second operand is evaluated only when the result of the conditional operator cannot be deduced solely by evaluating the first operand. Consequently, when the result of the conditional operator can be deduced solely from the result of the first operand, the second operand will remain unevaluated; its side effects, if any, will never occur.
The bitwise AND and OR operators (&
and |
) do not exhibit this lack short-circuit behavior. Like Similar to most other Java operators, they evaluate both operands, first the left operand, and then the right. They return the same Boolean result as &&
and ||
, respectively , but can have different overall effects depending on the presence or absence of side - effects in the second operand.
Consequently, either the &
or the &&
operator can be used when performing Boolean logic. However, there are times when the short-circuiting behavior is preferred and other times when the short-circuiting behavior causes subtle bugs.
Noncompliant Code Example (Improper &
)
...
This noncompliant code example, derived from Flanagan \ [[Flanagan 2005|AA. Bibliography#Flanagan 05]\], has two variables , with no guarantees regarding their current values. The code must validate its data and then check whether {{array\[i\]}} is nonnegativewith unknown variables. The code must validate its data and then check whether array[i]
is a valid index.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
int array[]; // mayMay be null int i; // mayMay be aan validinvalid index for array if (array != null & i >= 0 & i < array.length & array[i] >= 0) { // handleUse array } else { // handleHandle error } |
This code can fail as a result of the same errors it is attempting trying to prevent. When {{ Wiki Markup array
}} is null or when {{i}} is not a valid index, the reference to {{array\[i\]}} will cause a {{NullPointerException}} or an {{ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException}} to be thrown. This happens because the {{&}} operator fails to prevent evaluation of its right operand, even when evaluation of its left operand proves that the right operand is invalid is NULL
or i
is not a valid index, the reference to array
and array[i]
will cause either a NullPointerException
or an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
to be thrown. The exception occurs because the &
operator fails to prevent evaluation of its right operand even when evaluation of its left operand proves that the right operand is inconsequential.
Compliant Solution (Use &&
)
This compliant solution mitigates the problem by using &&
, which causes the evaluation of the conditional expression to terminate immediately if any of the conditions fail, thereby preventing a potentially-invalid evaluation.runtime exception:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
int array[]; // mayMay be null int i; // mayMay be aan validinvalid index for array if (array != null && i >= 0 && i i < array.length && array[i] >= 0) { // handleHandle array } else { // handleHandle error } |
Compliant Solution (Nested
...
if
Statements)
This compliant solution uses multiple if
statements to achieve the proper effect. While correct, it is more verbose and could be more difficult to maintain.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
int array[]; // mayMay be null int i; // mayMay be a valid index for array if (dataarray != null) { if (i >= 0 && i < dataarray.length) { if (dataarray[i] !>= -10) { // handleUse array } else { // handleHandle error } } else { // handleHandle error } } else { // handleHandle error } |
Although correct, this solution is more verbose and could be more difficult to maintain. Nevertheless, this solution would be useful if is preferable when the error-handling routines code for each potential failure condition failure were is different.
Noncompliant Code Example (Improper &&
)
This noncompliant code example demonstrates code that compares two arrays for ranges of members that match. Here i1
and i2
are valid array indices in array1
and array2
, respectively. It is expected that Variables end1
and end2
will point to the end are the indices of the ends of the matching ranges in the two arrays.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
if (end1 >= 0 & i2 >= 0) { int begin1 = i1; int begin2 = i2; while (++i1 < array1.length && ++i2 < array2.length && array1[i1] == array2[i2]) { // arraysArrays match so far } int end1 = i1; int end2 = i2; assert end1 - begin1 == end2 - begin2; } |
The problem with this code is that when the first condition in the while
loop fails, the second condition is does not executedexecute. That is, once i1
has reached array1.length
, the loop could terminate terminates after i1
is executedincremented. Consequently, the apparent range over array1
is larger than the apparent range over array2
, causing the final assertion to fail.
Compliant Solution (Use &
)
This compliant solution mitigates the problem by judiciously using &
, which guarantees that both i1
and i2
are incremented , regardless of the outcome of the first condition.:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public void exampleFunction() { while (++i1 < array1.length & // notNot && ++i2 < array2.length && array1[i1] == array2[i2]) |
Compliant Solution (Nested If Statements)
This compliant solution uses multiple if statements to achieve the proper effect. While correct, it is more verbose.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
while (true) { if (++i1 >= array1.length) break; if (++i2 >= array2.length) break; if (array1[i1] != array2[i2]) break; // rest of loop{ //doSomething } } |
...
Applicability
Failure to understand the behavior of the bitwise and conditional operators can cause unintended program behavior.
...
...
Severity
...
Likelihood
...
Remediation Cost
...
Priority
...
Level
...
EXP07-J
...
low
...
unlikely
...
medium
...
P2
...
L3
Related Guidelines
CERT C Secure Coding Standard: "EXP02-C. Be aware of the short-circuit behavior of the logical AND and OR operators"
CERT C++ Secure Coding Standard: "EXP02-CPP. Be aware of the short-circuit behavior of the logical AND and OR operators"
Bibliography
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="c01b267a-673e-4080-9a90-85e353ec62ee"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[[[Flanagan 2005AA. Bibliography#Flanagan 05]] | 2§2.5.6., "Boolean Operators | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> | <ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="2dac81f4-8843-4b77-9fa4-2bac035a6c1e"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | ||
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/expressions.html#15.23] | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |
|
...
EXP06-J. Use parentheses for precedence of operation 02. Expressions (EXP) EXP08-J. Do not write more than once to the same variable within an expression