Do not use the same variable name in two scopes where one scope is contained in another. Examples includeFor example,
- No other variable should share the name of a global variable if the other value variable is in a subscope of the global variable.
- A block should not declare a variable with the same name as a variable declared in any block that contains it.
Reusing variable names leads to programmer confusion about which variable is being modified. Additionally, if variable names are reused, generally one or both of the variable names are too generic.
...
Noncompliant Code Example
This non-compliant noncompliant code example reuses declares the msg
identifier twice: at the start of the compilation unit (with file scope ) and also and reuses the same identifier to declare a character array local to the report_error()
function. Consequently, the The programmer unintentionally copies a string may unintentionally copy the function argument to the locally declared msg
array within the report_error()
function, failing . Depending on the programmer's intention, it either fails to initialize the assign global variable and resulting in a potential buffer overflow msg
or allows the local msg
buffer to overflow by using the global value msgsize
as a bounds for the local buffer.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> static char msg[100]; static const size_t msgsize = sizeof( msg); void report_error(const char const *error_msgstr) { char msg[80]; snprintf(msg, msgsize, "Error: %s\n", str); /* ... */ } int strncpy(msg, error_msg, sizeof(msg));main(void) { /* ... */ report_error("some error"); return 0; } |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses different, more descriptive variable names:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> static char message[100]; static const size_t message_size = sizeof( message); void report_error(const char *strint main(void) { char error_msg[80]; snprintf(msg, sizeof( msg), "Error: %s\n", str); /* ... * Ensure error_msg isn't too long/ } int main(void) { /* ... */ report_error("some error"); return 0; } |
When the block is small, the danger of reusing variable names is mitigated by the visibility of the immediate declaration. Even in this case, however, variable name reuse is not desirable. In general, the larger the declarative region of an identifier, the more descriptive and verbose should be the name of the identifier.
By using different variable names globally and locally, the compiler forces the developer to be more precise and descriptive with variable names.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example declares two variables with the same identifier, but in slightly different scopes. The scope of the identifier i
declared in the for
loop's initial clause terminates after the closing curly brace of the for loop. The scope of the identifier i declared in the for
loop's compound statement terminates before the closing curly brace. Thus, the inner declaration of i
hides the outer declaration of i
, which can lead to unintentionally referencing the wrong object.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
void f(voidif (strlen(error_msg) >= sizeof(msg)) { for error_msg[sizeof(error_msg) - 1] = '\0'; } report_error(error_msg); (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { long i; /* ... */ } } |
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses different, more descriptive variable namesa unique identifier for the variable declared within the for
loop.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
char system_msg[100]; void report_error(char const *error_msgvoid f(void) { for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { char default_msg[80] long j; /* ... */ if (error_msg) strncpy(system_msg, error_msg, sizeof(system_msg)); else strncpy(system_msg, default_msg, sizeof(system_msg)); return; } int main} } |
Exceptions
DCL01-C-EX1: A function argument in a function declaration may clash with a variable in a containing scope provided that when the function is defined, the argument has a name that clashes with no variables in any containing scopes.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
extern int name;
void f(char *name); /* Declaration: no problem here */
/* ... */
void f(char *arg) { /* Definition: no problem; arg doesn't hide name */
/* Use arg */
}
|
DCL01-C-EX2: A temporary variable within a new scope inside of a macro can override an identifier in a containing scope. However,this exception does not apply to to the arguments of the macro itself.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#define SWAP(type, a, b) do { type tmp = a; a = b; b = tmp; } while(0) void func(void) { int tmp char error_msg[80]= 100; /*int Ensurea error_msg isn't too long */= 10, b = 20; if (strlen(error_msg) >= sizeof(system_msg)) { error_msg[sizeof(error_msg) - 1] = '\0'; } report_error(error_msg); /* ...SWAP(int, a, b); /* Hidden redeclaration of tmp is acceptable */ SWAP(int, tmp, b); /* NONCOMPLIANT: Hidden redeclaration of tmp clashes with argument */ } |
When the block is small, the danger of reusing variable names is mitigated by the visibility of the immediate declaration. Even in this case, however, variable name reuse is not desirable.
By using different variable names globally and locally, the compiler forces the developer to be more precise and descriptive with variable names.
Risk Assessment
Reusing a variable name in a subscope can lead to unintentionally referencing an incorrect variable.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL01- |
C |
Low |
Unlikely |
Medium | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
...
The LDRA tool suite V 7.6.0 is able to detect violations of this recommendation.
Compass / ROSE currently does not detect violations of this recommendation. However, detecting violations should be easy. One merely has to note every variable declaration. If the variable is static, it should go into some global list. If the variable is not static, but its name exists in the global list, then the rule has been violated.
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| Supported indirectly via MISRA C:2012 Rule 5.3. | |||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-DCL01 | |||||||
CodeSonar |
| LANG.ID.ND.NEST | Non-distinct identifiers: nested scope | ||||||
Compass/ROSE | |||||||||
| CC2.DCL01 | Fully implemented | |||||||
Helix QAC |
| C0795, C0796, C2547, C3334 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| MISRA.VAR.HIDDEN | |||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 131 S | Fully implemented | ||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-DCL01-a | Identifier declared in a local or function prototype scope shall not hide an identifier declared in a global or namespace scope | ||||||
PC-lint Plus |
| 578 | Fully supported | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for variable shadowing (rule fully covered) | |||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V561, V688, V703, V711, V2015 | |||||||
RuleChecker |
| Supported indirectly via MISRA C:2012 Rule 5.3. | |||||||
Splint |
|
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 5.2.4.1, "Translation limits"
\[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772|AA. C References#ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]\] "BRS Leveraging human experience" and "YOW Identifier name reuse"
\[[MISRA 04|AA. C References#MISRA 04]\] Rule 5.2 |
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | VOID DCL01-CPP. Do not reuse variable names in subscopes |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 5.3 (required) |
...
DCL00-A. Const-qualify immutable objects 02. Declarations and Initialization (DCL) DCL02-A. Use visually distinct identifiers