Long-running tasks should All tasks in a thread pool must provide a mechanism for notifying the application upon abnormal terminationif they terminate abnormally. Failure to do so does not cannot cause any resource leaks because the threads in the pool are still recycled, but it makes failure diagnosis extremely difficult or impossible.
The best way to handle exceptions at the application level is to use an exception handler. The handler can perform diagnostic actions, clean - up and shut down the JVMJava Virtual Machine, or simply log the details of the failure.
...
This noncompliant code example consists of the PoolService
class that encapsulates a thread pool and a runnable Task
class. The Task.run()
method can throw runtime exceptions, such as NullPointerException
.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
final class PoolService {
private final ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
public void doSomething() {
pool.execute(new Task());
}
}
final class Task implements Runnable {
@Override public void run() {
// ...
throw new NullPointerException();
// ...
}
}
|
The task does not fails to notify the application when it terminates unexpectedly as a result of the runtime exception. Moreover, it does not use any lacks a recovery mechanism. Consequently, if Task
throws were to throw a NullPointerException
, the exception is would be ignored.
Compliant Solution (ThreadPoolExecutor
Hooks)
Task-specific recovery or clean-up cleanup actions can be performed by overriding the {{ Wiki Markup afterExecute()
}} hook of the {{java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor
}} class. This hook is called either when a task concludes successfully by executing all statements in its {{run()
}} method or when the task halts because of an exception. ({{Some implementations may fail to catch java.lang.Error
}} might not be captured on specific implementations. See [Bug ID 6450211|http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6450211] for more information \[[SDN 2008|AA. Bibliography#SDN 08]\]). When using this approach, substitute the executor service with a custom {{ThreadPoolExecutor}} that overrides the {{afterExecute()}} hook as shown below (see Bug ID 6450211 for more information [SDN 2008]). When using this approach, substitute the executor service with a custom ThreadPoolExecutor
that overrides the afterExecute()
hook:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
final class PoolService { // The values have been hard-coded for brevity ExecutorService pool = new CustomThreadPoolExecutor( 10, 10, 10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(10)); // ... } class CustomThreadPoolExecutor extends ThreadPoolExecutor { // ... Constructor ... public CustomThreadPoolExecutor( int corePoolSize, int maximumPoolSize, long keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit, BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue) { super(corePoolSize, maximumPoolSize, keepAliveTime, unit, workQueue); } @Override public void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) { super.afterExecute(r, t); if (t != null) { // Exception occurred, forward to handler } // ... Perform task-specific clean-upcleanup actions } @Override public void terminated() { super.terminated(); // ... Perform final clean-up actions } } |
...
This compliant solution sets an uncaught exception handler on behalf of the thread pool. A ThreadFactory
argument is passed to the thread pool during construction. The factory is responsible for creating new threads and setting the uncaught exception handler on their behalf. The Task
class is unchanged from the noncompliant code example.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
final class PoolService { private static final ThreadFactory factory = new new ExceptionThreadFactory(new MyExceptionHandler()); private static final ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10, factory); public void doSomething() { pool.execute(new Task()); // Task is a runnable class } public static class ExceptionThreadFactory implements ThreadFactory { private static final ThreadFactory defaultFactory = Executors.defaultThreadFactory(); private final Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler handler; public ExceptionThreadFactory( Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler handler) { this.handler = handler; } @Override public Thread newThread(Runnable run) { Thread thread = defaultFactory.newThread(run); thread.setUncaughtExceptionHandler(handler); return thread; } } public static class MyExceptionHandler extends ExceptionReporter implements Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler { // ... @Override public void uncaughtException(Thread thread, Throwable t) { // Recovery or logging code } } } |
The {{ Wiki Markup ExecutorService.submit()
}} method can be used to submit a task to a thread pool instead of the {{execute()}} method to obtain a {{Future}} object. Note that the uncaught exception handler is not called if {{ExecutorService.submit()}} is invoked. This is because the thrown exception is considered to be part of the return status and is consequently wrapped in an {{ExecutionException}} and re-thrown by {{Future.get()}} \[[Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\]used (in place of the execute()
method) to submit a task to a thread pool and obtain a Future
object. When the task is submitted via ExecutorService.submit()
, thrown exceptions never reach the uncaught exception handler because the thrown exception is considered to be part of the return status and is consequently wrapped in an ExecutionException
and rethrown by Future.get()
[Goetz 2006a].
Compliant Solution (Future<V>
and submit()
)
This compliant solution invokes the ExecutorService.submit()
method to submit the task so that a Future
object can be obtained. It uses the Future
object to let the task re-throw rethrow the exception so that it can be handled locally.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
final class PoolService {
private final ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
public void doSomething() {
Future<?> future = pool.submit(new Task());
// ...
try {
future.get();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
Throwable exception = e.getCause();
// Forward to exception reporter
}
}
}
|
Furthermore, any exception that prevents doSomething()
from obtaining the Future
value can be handled as required.
Exceptions
TPS03-J-EX1EX0: This guideline rule may be violated if only when the code for all runnable and callable tasks has been audited to ensure that no exceptional conditions are possibleimpossible. Nonetheless, it is usually a remains good practice to install a task-specific or global exception handler to initiate recovery or log the any exceptional conditionconditions.
Risk Assessment
Failing Failure to provide a mechanism for reporting that tasks in a thread pool failed as a result of an exceptional condition can make it harder difficult or impossible to find the source of the issuediagnose the problem.
Guideline Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPS03-J | low Low | probable Probable | medium Medium | P4 | L3 |
To-Do List
Tasklist | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
||Completed||Priority||Locked||CreatedDate||CompletedDate||Assignee||Name|| |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[API 2006|AA. Bibliography#API 06]\] interfaces {{ExecutorService}}, {{ThreadFactory}} and class {{Thread}}
\[[Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\] Chapter 7.3: Handling abnormal thread termination |
Related Guidelines
Bibliography
[API 2014] | Class ThreadFactory |
Chapter 7.3, "Handling Abnormal Thread Termination" |
...