Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Choosing to implement the Comparable interface represents a commitment that the implementation of the compareTo() method adheres to the general usage contract for that method regarding how the method is to be called. Library classes such as TreeSet and TreeMap accept Comparable objects and use the associated compareTo() methods to sort the objects. However, a class that implements the compareTo() method in an unexpected way can cause undesirable results.unmigrated-wiki-markup

The general usage contract for {{compareTo()}} from Java SE 6 API \[[API 2006|AA. Bibliography#API 06], numbering added\] states 8 API [API 2014] states that

  1. The implementor must ensure sgn(x.compareTo(y)) == -sgn(y.compareTo(x)) for all x and y. (This implies that x.compareTo(y) must throw an exception iff if y.compareTo(x) throws an exception.)
  2. The implementor must also ensure that the relation is transitive: (x.compareTo(y) > 0 && y.compareTo(z) > 0) implies x.compareTo(z) > 0.
  3. Finally, the implementor must ensure that x.compareTo(y) == 0 implies that sgn(x.compareTo(z)) == sgn(y.compareTo(z)), for all z.
  4. It is strongly recommended, but not strictly required, that (x.compareTo(y) == 0) == x.equals(y). Generally speaking, any class that implements the Comparable interface and violates this condition should clearly indicate this fact. The recommended language is " Note: this class has a natural ordering that is inconsistent with equals."

In the foregoing description, the notation sgn(expression) designates the mathematical signum function, which is defined to return either -1, 0, or 1 depending on whether the value of the expression is negative, zero or positive.

Never Implementations must never violate any of the first three conditions when implementing the compareTo() method. Implementations should conform to the fourth condition whenever possible.

Noncompliant Code Example (Rock-Paper-Scissors)

This program implements the classic game of rock-paper-scissors, using the compareTo() operator to determine the winner of a game.:

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC

class GameEntry implements Comparable {
  public enum Roshambo {ROCK, PAPER, SCISSORS}
  private Roshambo value;

  public GameEntry(Roshambo value) {
    this.value = value;
  }

  public int compareTo(Object that) {
    if (!(that instanceof RoshamboGameEntry)) {
      throw new ClassCastException();
    }
    GameEntry t = (GameEntry) that;
    return (value == t.value) ? 0
      : (value == Roshambo.ROCK && t.value == Roshambo.PAPER) ? -1
      : (value == Roshambo.PAPER && t.value == Roshambo.SCISSORS) ? -1
      : (value == Roshambo.SCISSORS && t.value == Roshambo.ROCK) ? -1
      : 1;
  }
}

However, this game violates the notion of required transitivity property because Rock rock beats Scissorsscissors, Scissors scissors beats Paperpaper, but Rock rock does not beat Paperpaper.

Compliant Solution (Rock-Paper-Scissors)

This compliant solution implements the same game but does not use without using the Comparable interface.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

class GameEntry {
  public enum Roshambo {ROCK, PAPER, SCISSORS}
  private Roshambo value;

  public GameEntry(Roshambo value) {
    this.value = value;
  }

  public int beats(Object that) {
    if (!(that instanceof RoshamboGameEntry)) {
      throw new ClassCastException();
    }
    GameEntry t = (GameEntry) that;
    return (value == t.value) ? 0
      : (value == Roshambo.ROCK && t.value == Roshambo.PAPER) ? -1
      : (value == Roshambo.PAPER && t.value == Roshambo.SCISSORS) ? -1
      : (value == Roshambo.SCISSORS && t.value == Roshambo.ROCK) ? -1
      : 1;
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Violating the general contract when implementing the compareTo() method can result in cause unexpected results, possibly leading to invalid comparisons and information disclosure.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

MET14

MET10-J

medium

Medium

unlikely

Unlikely

medium

Medium

P4

L3

Automated Detection

...

Automated detections of violations of this rule is infeasible in the general case.

Tool
Version
Checker
Description
CodeSonar
Include Page
CodeSonar_V
CodeSonar_V

JAVA.CLASS.MCS

Missing Call to super (Java)

Coverity7.5FB.RU_INVOKE_RUNImplemented

Related Guidelines

Bibliography


...

Image Added Image Added

The Coverity Prevent Version 5.0 MUTABLE_COMPARISON checker can detect the instances where compareTo method is reading from a non-constant field. If the non-constant field is modified, the value of compareTo might change, which may break program invariants.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Other Languages

This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as ARR40-CPP. Use a valid ordering rule.

Bibliography

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="aeda1e64-e283-4564-8730-60a5db0a828c"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[API 2006

AA. Bibliography#API 06]]

method [compareTo()

http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Comparable.html#compareTo(java.lang.Object)]

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="c6ec64ae-1eaa-4f28-a8ba-b79945843ce8"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[JLS 2005

AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]]

 

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

MET13-J. Classes that define an equals() method must also define a hashCode() method      05. Methods (MET)      Image Modified