The Java classes used by a program are not necessarily loaded upon program startup. Many Java Virtual Machines (JVMs) load classes only when they need them.
If untrusted code is permitted to load classes, it may possess the ability to load a malicious class. This is a class that shares a fully-qualified name with a benign class that is required by trusted code. When the trusted code tries to load its benign class, the JVM provides it with the malicious class instead. As a result, if a program permits untrusted code to load classes, it must first preload any benign classes it needs. Once loaded, these benign classes cannot be replaced by untrusted code.
Noncompliant Code Example (Tomcat)
When any method from the following table is invoked on a Class
, ClassLoader
or Thread
object, a comparison is run between the method's immediate caller's class loader and that of the object on which the method is invoked.
APIs capable of bypassing SecurityManager's checks |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wiki Markup |
---|
As an example of what constitutes the immediate caller and the object, consider the method {{java.lang.Class.newInstance()}}. Here, the immediate caller is the class that contains this method call whereas the object on which the {{newInstance()}} method is being invoked is referred to as the {{Class}} object ({{classObjectName.newInstance()}}). According to the Java Language Specification \[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], the method {{getClass}} returns the {{Class}} object that represents the class of the object. |
If a security manager is present, untrusted code that does not have the permissions to use the API directly is prevented from indirectly using trusted code containing the API call to perform the operation. However, the security manager checks are bypassed if the class loader of the immediate caller is the same as or the delegation ancestor of the class loader of the object on which the API is invoked. Consequently, untrusted callers who do not have the required permissions but are capable of passing the class loader check are able to perform sensitive operations if the trusted code invokes these APIs on their behalf.
The Java SE 6 class loader delegation hierarchy shown below summarizes several cases and highlights those where security checks are bypassed:
Immediate Caller | ICC* | Class Object | COC** | Class Loader Check | Security Check |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | A | C2, C3, C4, C5 | Application, B, C | A is not a delegation ancestor of Application, B or C | Yes |
C2 | Application | C1 | A | Application is not a delegation ancestor of A | Yes |
C2 | Application | C3, C4, C5 | B and C | Application is a delegation ancestor of B and C | No |
C3 | B | C4 | B | The class loader is same for C3 and C4 (B) | No |
C4 | B | C3 | B | The class loader is same for C4 and C3 (B) | No |
C5 | C | C1, C2, C3, C4 | Application, A, B, C | C is not a delegation ancestor of Application, A, B or C | Yes |
* ICC: Intermediate caller's class loader
** COC: Class object's class loader
Care must be taken when using these APIs that trusted code does not accept Class
objects from untrusted code for further use. For example, if trusted code is loaded by the bootstrap class loader, it can create an instance of a sensitive system class by using the newInstance()
method on the Class
object. If the method that creates the instance is visible to untrusted code, no security manager checks are carried out to prohibit the untrusted code from indirectly creating the class instance (untrusted code must pass the class loader comparison check).
Similarly, instances of trusted Class
objects should not be returned to untrusted code. An untrusted caller can invoke the affected APIs and bypass security checks if its class loader is the same as or the delegation ancestor of the trusted code's class loader.
The table also shows APIs that use the ClassLoader
class object. Class loaders facilitate isolation of trusted components from untrusted ones. They also ensure that the untrusted components do not interfere with each other. The proper choice of the class loader to load a class is of utmost importance. Using less trusted class loaders for performing operations of sensitive nature in trusted code can result in vulnerabilities.
With respect to the ClassLoader
object APIs, security manager checks may also get bypassed depending on the immediate caller's class loader. Consider for instance, the ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
and ClassLoader.getParent()
methods that operate on a ClassLoader
object. In the presence of a security manager, these methods succeed only if the immediate caller's class loader is the delegation ancestor of the current ClassLoader
object's class loader or if the immediate caller's class loader is the same as the current ClassLoader
object's class loader or if the code in the current execution context has the getClassLoader
RunTimePermission
.
As noted earlier, untrusted code can bypass the security checks if its class loader is either the same or a delegation ancestor of the trusted code's class loader. Consequently, care must be taken while specifying the parent of a trusted class loader. Likewise, trusted code should not use a class loader instance supplied by untrusted code. For instance, a class loader instance obtained from untrusted code should not be used to load a trusted class that performs some sensitive operation. Also, a trusted class loader that performs security sensitive operations should never be made available to untrusted code by returning its instance.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example accepts a class object from untrusted code, creates a new instance of the class using the permissions of the immediate caller getInstance()
and returns the created instance back to untrusted code.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Trusted {
public Object getInstance(Class<?> c) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
return c.newInstance();
}
}
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution reduces the accessibility of getInstance()
to package-private so that untrusted code cannot obtain the newly created instance.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Trusted {
Object getInstance(Class<?> c) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
return c.newInstance();
}
}
|
...
This noncompliant code example shows a vulnerability present in several versions of the Tomcat HTTP web server (fixed in v version 6.0.20) that allows untrusted web applications to override the default XML parser used by the system to process web.xml
, context.xml
and tld tag library descriptor (TLD) files of other web applications deployed on the Tomcat instance. Consequently, untrusted web applications that install a parser can could view and/or alter these files under limited certain circumstances.
This noncompliant code example shows the declaration of a {{Digester}} instance in the {{The noncompliant code example shows the code associated with initialization of a new Wiki Markup Digester
instance in the org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig
}} class. "A {{Digester
}} processes an XML input stream by matching a series of element nesting patterns to execute Rules that have been added prior to the start of parsing" \ [[Tomcat 2009|AA. Bibliography#Tomcat 09]\]. The method call chain can be traced as the following:]. The code to initialize the Digester
follows:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
protected static Digester webDigester = null;
if (webDigester == null) {
webDigester = createWebDigester();
}
|
The createWebDigester()
method is responsible for creating the Digester
. This method
...
calls createWebXMLDigester()
...
, which invokes the method DigesterFactory.newDigester()
...
. This method creates the new digester instance and sets a boolean
flag useContextClassLoader
to true
...
.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
protected static Digester webDigester = null; if(webDigester == null){ webDigester = createWebDigester(); } // This method exists in the class DigesterFactory and is called by // ContextConfig.createWebXmlDigester(). // which is in turn called by ContextConfig.createWebDigester() // webDigester finally contains the value of digester defined // in this method. public static Digester newDigester(boolean xmlValidation, boolean xmlNamespaceAware, RuleSet rule) { Digester digester = new Digester(); // ... digester.setUseContextClassLoader(true); // ... return digester; } // Digester.getParser() calls this method. It is defined in class Digester public SAXParserFactory getFactory() { if (factory ==RuleSet nullrule) { Digester digester factory= =new SAXParserFactory.newInstanceDigester(); // Uses WebappClassLoader... digester.setUseContextClassLoader(true); // ... } return (factory)digester; } |
- Later, when the
Digester.getParser()
method is internally called by Tomcat to process the web.xml and other files, according to the search rules, the parser installed by the untrusted web application is preferred; otherwise, the default parser is used.
The underlying problem is that the newInstance()
method is being invoked on behalf of an untrusted web application's class loader.
The Digester
class overrides Object's getClassLoader()
method and this is used to obtain the class loader to load the class, depending on the value of the flag useContextClassLoader
. A partial implementation is shown belowThe useContextClassLoader
flag is used by Digester
to decide which ClassLoader
to use when loading new classes. When true, it uses the WebappClassLoader
, which is untrusted because it loads whatever classes are requested by various web applications.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public ClassLoader getClassLoader() { // ... if (this.useContextClassLoader) { // Uses the context class loader which was previously set // to the WebappClassLoader ClassLoader classLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(); } return classloader; } |
Similarly, the contextDigester
processing is also broken in the affected versions.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses an initThe Digester.getParser()
method to create the webDigester
.is subsequently called by Tomcat to process web.xml
and other files:
Code Block | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
// Digester.getParser() calls this method. It is defined in class Digester public SAXParserFactory getFactory protected static Digester webDigester = null; protected void init() { if (webDigesterfactory == null) { webDigesterfactory = createWebDigester(); webDigester.getParserSAXParserFactory.newInstance(); // DoesUses notWebappClassLoader use the context Classloader at initialization// ... } // ...return (factory); } |
The explicit webDigester.getParser()
call causes underlying problem is that the newInstance()
method is being invoked on behalf of a web application's class loader, the WebappClassLoader
, and it loads classes before Tomcat has loaded all the classes it needs. If a web application has loaded its own Trojan javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory
, when Tomcat tries to access a SAXParserFactory
, it accesses the Trojan SaxParserFactory
installed by the web application rather than the standard Java SAXParserFactory
that Tomcat depends on.
Note that the Class.newInstance()
method requires the class to contain a no-argument constructor. If this requirement is not satisfied, a runtime exception results, which indirectly prevents a security breach.
Compliant Solution (Tomcat)
In this compliant solution, Tomcat initializes the SAXParserFactory
when it creates the Digester
. This guarantees that the SAXParserFactory
is constructed using the container's class loader rather than the WebappClassLoader
.
The webDigester
is also declared final. This prevents any subclasses from assigning a new object reference to webDigester
. (See rule OBJ10-J. Do not use public static nonfinal fields for more information.) It also prevents a race condition where another thread could access webDigester
before it is fully initialized. (See rule OBJ11-J. Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions for more information.)
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
protected static final Digester webDigester = init();
protected Digester init() {
Digester digester = createWebDigester();
// Does not use the context Classloader at initialization
digester.getParser();
return digester;
}
|
Even if the Tomcat server continues to use to be invoked using the container's class loader instead of the WebAppClassLoader. This is because the flag useContextClassLoader
is not (??) set during initialization which captures the container's class loader at that time to define the Digester
(the context class loader is the container's class loader at this point). Later, even if the Tomcat server still uses the WebappClassLoader
to create the parser instance when attempting to process the web.xml
and other files, the explicit call to getParser()
in init()
ensures that the default parser is has been set during prior initialization and is impossible to replacecannot be replaced. Because this is a one-time setting, future attempts to change the parser are futile.
Compliant Solution
Do not accept Class
, ClassLoader
or Thread
instances from untrusted code. If inevitable, safely acquire these instances by ensuring they come from trusted sources. Additionally, make sure to discard tainted inputs from untrusted code. Likewise, objects returned by the affected methods should not be propagated back to the untrusted code.
Note that the Class.newInstance()
method requires the class to contain a no-argument constructor. If this requirement is not satisfied, a runtime exception results, which indirectly prevents a security breach.
Risk Assessment
Bypassing Security manager checks may seriously compromise the security of a Java application.
Risk Assessment
Allowing untrusted code to load classes enables untrusted code to replace benign classes with Trojan classes.
Guideline
Rule |
---|
Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|
SEC03-J | high | probable | medium | P12 | L1 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Bibliography
...
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Parasoft Jtest | 9.5 | CERT.SEC03.ACL | Do not access the class loader in a web component |
Related Guidelines
Secure Coding Guidelines for the Java Programming Language, Version 3.0 | Guideline 6-3. Safely invoke standard APIs that bypass |
Android Implementation Details
On Android, the use of DexClassLoader
or PathClassLoader
requires caution.
Bibliography
[CVE 2011] | |
Section |
...
4.3.2, |
...
Class |
...
Loader |
...
Delegation |
...
Hierarchy |
...
[ |
...
...
...
] | §4.3.2, |
...
The |
...
Class |
...
| |
Bug ID 29936, API Class |
...
, |
...
...
...
...
...
...
|http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html]SEC03-J. Do not allow tainted variables in doPrivileged blocks 14. Platform Security (SEC) SEC05-J. Do not expose standard APIs that use the immediate caller's class loader instance to untrusted code