According to the _The Java Language Specification_ (JLS), [§12§12.4, "Initialization of Classes and Interfaces" |http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/execution.html#12.4] \ [[JLS 2005|AA. References#JLS 05]\]: Wiki Markup
Initialization of a class consists of executing its
static
initializers and the initializers forstatic
fields (class variables) declared in the class.
Therefore, the presence of a static field triggers the initialization of a class. However, the initializer of a static field could depend on the initialization of another class, possibly creating an initialization cycle.
The JLS also states in [§8§8.3.2.1, "Initializers for Class Variables" |http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.3.2.1] \ [[JLS 2005|AA. References#JLS 05]\]]: Wiki Markup
At run time,
static
variables that arefinal
and that are initialized with compile-time constant values are initialized first.
This statement can be misleading because it is inapplicable does not apply to instances that use values of static final fields that are initialized at a later stage. Declaring a field to be static final is insufficient to guarantee that it is fully initialized before being read.
Programs in general should — and should—and security-sensitive programs must — eliminate must—eliminate all class initialization cycles.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Intraclass Cycle)
This noncompliant code example contains an intra-class intraclass initialization cycle.:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Cycle {
private final int balance;
private static final Cycle c = new Cycle();
private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit
public Cycle() {
balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance);
}
}
|
The Cycle
class declares a private static final
class variable, which is initialized to a new instance of the Cycle
class. Static initializers are guaranteed to be invoked once before the first use of a static class member or the first invocation of a constructor.
The programmer's intent is to calculate the account balance by subtracting the processing fee from the deposited amount. However, the initialization of the c
class variable happens before the runtime initialization of the deposit
field is initialized because it appears lexically before the initialization of the deposit
field. Consequently, the value of deposit
seen by the constructor, when invoked during the static initialization of c
, is the initial value of deposit
(0) rather than the random value. As a result, the balance is always computed to be -10
.
The JLS permits implementations to ignore the possibility of such recursive initialization cycles \[[Bloch 2005|AA. References#Bloch 05]\]Step 3 of the detailed initialized procedure described in JLS §12.4.2 [JLS 2014] permits implementations to ignore the possibility of such recursive initialization cycles. Wiki Markup
Compliant Solution (
...
Intraclass Cycle)
This compliant solution changes the initialization order of the class Cycle
so that the fields are initialized without creating any dependency cycles. Specifically, the initialization of c
is placed lexically after the initialization of deposit
so that it occurs temporally after deposit
is fully initialized.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Cycle {
private final int balance;
private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit
private static final Cycle c = new Cycle(); // Inserted after initialization of required fields
public Cycle() {
balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance);
}
}
|
Such initialization cycles become insidious when many fields are involved. Consequently, so it is important to ensure that the control flow lacks such cycles.
Although this compliant solution prevents the initialization cycle, it depends on declaration order and is consequently fragile; later maintainers of the software may be unaware that the declaration order must be maintained to preserve correctness. Consequently, such dependencies must be clearly documented in the code.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Interclass Cycle)
This noncompliant code example declares two classes with static variables whose values depend on each other. The cycle is obvious when the classes are seen together (as here) but is easy to miss when viewing the classes separately.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class A {
public static final int a = B.b + 1;
// ...
}
class B {
public static final int b = A.a + 1;
// ...
}
|
The initialization order of the classes can vary and, consequently, cause causing computation of different values for A.a
and B.b
. When class A
is initialized first, A.a
will have the value 2, and B.b
will have the value 1. These values will be reversed when class B
is initialized first.
Compliant Solution (
...
Interclass Cycle)
This compliant solution breaks the interclass cycle by eliminating one of the dependencies.the dependency of A
on B
:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class A { public static final int a = 2; // ... } // class B unchanged: { public static final int b = A.a + 1; // ... } |
With the cycle broken, the initial values will always be A.a = 2
and B.b = 3
regardless of initialization order.
Noncompliant Code Example
The programmer in this noncompliant code example attempts to initialize a static variable in one class using a static method in a second class, but that method in turn relies on a static method in the first class:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
class A {
public static int a = B.b();
public static int c() { return 1; }
}
class B {
public static int b() { return A.c(); }
}
|
This code correctly initializes A.a
to 1, using the Oracle JVM, regardless of initialization order.whether A
or B
is loaded first. However, the JLS does not guarantee A.a
to be properly initialized. Furthermore, the initialization cycle makes this system harder to maintain and more likely to break in surprising ways when modified.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution moves the c()
method into class B
, breaking the cycle:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
class A {
public static int a = B.b();
}
class B {
public static int b() { return B.c(); }
public static int c() { return 1; }
}
|
Risk Assessment
Initialization cycles may lead to unexpected results.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL00-J |
Low |
Unlikely |
Medium | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar |
| JAVA.STRUCT.UA JAVA.STRUCT.UA.DEFAULT | Useless Assignment (Java) Useless Assignment to Default (Java) | ||||||
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.DCL00.ACD | Ensure that files do not contain cyclical dependencies | ||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V6050 | |||||||
SonarQube |
| Classes should not access their own subclasses during initialization |
Related Guidelines
VOID DCL14-CPP. Avoid assumptions about the initialization order between translation units |
http://www.aitcnet.org/isai/]
Initialization of |
Variables [LAV] |
]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>
Bibliography
Bibliography
Puzzle 49, "Larger than Life" | |
[JLS 2005] |
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="43000ddf-4a27-4f17-964b-4ca0da7c9724"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[
[[JLS 2005
AA. References#JLS 05]]
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.3.2.1]
]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>
§12.4, " |
Initialization of Classes and Interfaces |
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="cc03635f-1f64-4128-a9ed-439120fae9c0
" |
[[Bloch 2005
AA. References#Bloch 05]]
Puzzle 49. Larger than life
]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="474bc0f5-50dd-4659-9a54-85f679a1e6b2"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[
[[MITRE 2009
AA. References#MITRE 09]]
[CWE-665
http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/665.html]. Improper initialization
]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>
[Seacord 2015] | DCL00-J. Prevent class initialization cycles LiveLesson |
...
01. Declarations and Initialization (DCL) 01. Declarations and Initialization (DCL)