Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: excess synchronization

...

The

...

singleton

...

design

...

pattern's

...

intent

...

is

...

succinctly

...

described

...

by

...

the

...

seminal

...

work

...

of Gamma and colleagues [Gamma 1995]:

Ensure a class only has one instance, and provide a global point of access to it.

Because there is only one singleton instance, "any instance fields of a Singleton will occur only once per class, just like static fields. Singletons often control access to resources such as database connections or sockets" [Fox 2001]. Other applications of singletons involve maintaining performance statistics, monitoring and logging system activity, implementing printer spoolers, and even tasks such as ensuring that only one audio file plays at a time. Classes that contain only static methods are good candidates for the Singleton pattern.

The Singleton pattern typically uses a single instance of a class that encloses a private static class field. The instance can be created using lazy initialization, which means that the instance is not created when the class loads but when it is first used.

A class that implements the singleton design pattern must prevent multiple instantiations. Relevant techniques include the following:

  • Making its constructor private
  • Employing lock mechanisms to prevent an initialization routine from being run simultaneously by multiple threads
  • Ensuring the class is not serializable
  • Ensuring the class cannot be cloned
  • Preventing the class from being garbage-collected if it was loaded by a custom class loader

Noncompliant Code Example (Nonprivate Constructor)

This noncompliant code example uses a nonprivate constructor for instantiating a singleton:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
 Gamma et al. \[[Gamma 95|AA. Java References#Gamma 95]\]:

{quote}
Ensure a class only has one instance, and provide a global point of access to it.
{quote}

"Since there is only one Singleton instance, any instance fields of a Singleton will occur only once per class, just like {{static}} fields. Singletons often control access to resources such as database connections or sockets." \[[Fox 01|AA. Java References#Fox 01]\]. Other applications of singletons involve maintaining performance statistics, system monitoring and logging, implementing printer spoolers or as simple as ensuring that only one audio file plays at a time. Classes that contain only {{static}} methods are good candidates for singletons. 

Typically, the Singleton pattern uses a single instance of a class that encloses a {{private static}} class field. The instance can be created using _lazy initialization_, which means that the instance is not created when the class loads but when it is first used.

h2. Noncompliant Code Example (non-private constructor)

This noncompliant code example uses a non-private constructor for instantiating a singleton.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton {
  private static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  protected MySingleton() {    
    // private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
    INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
  }

  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {    
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

A

...

malicious

...

subclass

...

may

...

extend

...

the

...

accessibility

...

of

...

the

...

constructor

...

from

...

protected

...

to

...

public

...

,

...

allowing

...

untrusted

...

code

...

to

...

create

...

multiple

...

instances

...

of

...

the

...

singleton.

...

Also,

...

the

...

class field Instance has not been declared final.

Compliant Solution (Private Constructor)

This compliant solution reduces the accessibility of the constructor to private and immediately initializes the field Instance, allowing it to be declared final. Singleton constructors must be private.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
 field {{INSTANCE}} has not been declared as {{final}}.

h2. Compliant Solution ({{private}} constructor)

This compliant solution reduces the accessibility of the constructor to {{private}} and initializes the field {{INSTANCE}} immediately, allowing it to be declared {{final}}.

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
class MySingleton {
  private static final MySingleton INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();

  private MySingleton() {    
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {    
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

The MySingleton class need not be declared final because it has a private constructor.

(Note that the initialization of instance  is done when MySingleton  is loaded, consequently it is protected by the class's initialization lock. See the JLS s12.4.2 for more information.)

Noncompliant Code Example (Visibility across Threads)

Multiple instances of the Singleton class can be created when the getter method is tasked with initializing the singleton when necessary, and the getter method is invoked by two or more threads simultaneously.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

The {{MySingleton}} class need not be declared as final because it has a private constructor.

h2. Noncompliant Code Example (visibility across threads)

When the getter method is called by two (or more) threads simultaneously, multiple instances of the {{Singleton}} class might result if access is not synchronized.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton {
  private static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  private MySingleton() {    
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static MySingleton getInstance() { // Not synchronized
    if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
      INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

h2. Noncompliant Code Example (inappropriate synchronization)

Multiple instances can be created even if the singleton construction is encapsulated in a {{synchronized}} block

A singleton initializer method in a multithreaded program must employ some form of locking to prevent construction of multiple singleton objects.

Noncompliant Code Example (Inappropriate Synchronization)

Multiple instances can be created even when the singleton construction is encapsulated in a synchronized block, as in this noncompliant code example:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
public static MySingleton getInstance() {
  if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
    synchronized (MySingleton.class) {
      INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
    }
  }
  return INSTANCEinstance;
}
{code}

This is because two or more threads may simultaneously see the field {{INSTANCE}} as {{null}} in the {{if}} condition, and enter the synchronized block one at a time.

The reason multiple instances can be created in this case is that two or more threads may simultaneously see the field instance as null in the if condition and enter the synchronized block one at a time.

Compliant Solution (Synchronized Method)

To address the issue of multiple threads creating more than one instance of the singleton, make getInstance() a synchronized method:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
h2. Compliant Solution (1) ({{synchronized}} method)

To avoid the issue of multiple threads creating more than one instance of the singleton, make {{getInstance()}} a {{synchronized}} method.

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
class MySingleton {
  private static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
      INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}

Compliant Solution (Double-Checked Locking)

Another compliant solution for implementing thread-safe singletons is the correct use of the double-checked locking idiom:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
{code}

h2. Compliant Solution (2) (double-checked locking)

Another compliant solution for implementing thread-safe singletons is the double-checked locking idiom.  

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
class MySingleton {
  private static volatile MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Double-checked locking
  public static MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
      synchronized (MySingleton.class) {
        if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
          INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
        }
      }
    }
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

This

...

design

...

pattern

...

is

...

often

...

implemented

...

incorrectly

...

(see LCK10-J. Use a correct form of the double-checked

...

locking

...

idiom

...

for

...

more

...

details

...

on

...

the correct use of the

...

double-checked

...

locking

...

idiom).

...

Compliant

...

Solution

...

(

...

Initialize-on-Demand Holder Class Idiom)

This compliant solution uses a static inner class to create the singleton instance:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
demand holder class idiom)

This compliant solution uses a {{static}} inner class to create the singleton instance.

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
class MySingleton {
  static class SingletonHolder {
    static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
  }

  public static MySingleton getInstance() {
    return SingletonHolder.INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

This is known as the 

This approach is known as the initialize-on-demand

...

holder

...

class

...

idiom (see LCK10-J. Use a correct form of the double-checked locking idiom for more information).

Noncompliant Code Example (Serializable)

This noncompliant code example implements the java.io.Serializable

...

interface

...

, which

...

allows

...

the

...

class

...

to

...

be

...

serialized.

...

Deserialization

...

of

...

the

...

class

...

implies

...

that

...

multiple

...

instances

...

of

...

the

...

singleton

...

can

...

be

...

created.

{:=
Code Block
bgColor
#FFcccc
}
class MySingleton implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 6825273283542226860L;
  private static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
      INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }
}
{code}

A

...

singleton's

...

constructor

...

cannot

...

install

...

checks

...

to

...

enforce

...

the

...

requirement

...

that

...

the class is instantiated only once because deserialization can bypass the object's

...

constructor.

...

Noncompliant

...

Code

...

Example

...

(readResolve() Method)

Adding a readResolve()

...

method

...

that

...

returns

...

the

...

original

...

instance

...

is insufficient to enforce the singleton property.

...

This

...

technique is

...

insecure

...

even

...

when all

...

the

...

fields

...

are

...

declared

...

transient

...

or

...

static.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
}}. 

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 6825273283542226860L;
  private static MySingleton INSTANCEinstance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // privatePrivate constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCEinstance == null) {
      INSTANCEinstance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCEinstance;
  }

  private Object readResolve() {
    return INSTANCEinstance; 
  }
}
{code} 

At 

At runtime,

...

an

...

attacker

...

can

...

add

...

a

...

class

...

that

...

reads

...

in

...

a

...

crafted

...

serialized

...

stream:

Code Block


{code}
public class Untrusted implements Serializable {
  public static MySingleton captured;
  public MySingleton capture;
  
  public Untrusted(MySingleton capture) {
    this.capture = capture;
  }

  private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in)
                          throws Exception {
    in.defaultReadObject();
    captured = capture;
  }
}
{code}

The

...

crafted

...

stream

...

can be

...

generated

...

by

...

serializing

...

the

...

following

...

class:

Code Block


{code}
public final class MySingleton
                   implements java.io.Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID =
      6825273283542226860L;
  public Untrusted untrusted =
      new Untrusted(this); // Additional serial field
 
  public MySingleton() { }
}
{code}

Upon

...

deserialization,

...

the

...

field

...

MySingleton.untrusted

...

is

...

reconstructed

...

before

...

MySingleton.readResolve()

...

is

...

called.

...

Consequently,

...

Untrusted.captured

...

is

...

assigned

...

the

...

deserialized

...

instance

...

of

...

the

...

crafted

...

stream

...

instead

...

of

...

MySingleton.

...

instance.

...

This

...

issue

...

is

...

pernicious

...

when

...

an

...

attacker

...

can

...

add

...

classes

...

to

...

exploit

...

the

...

singleton

...

guarantee

...

of

...

an

...

existing

...

serializable class.

Noncompliant Code Example (Nontransient Instance Fields)

This serializable noncompliant code example uses a nontransient instance field str:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
class MySingleton implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID =
      2787342337386756967L;
  private static MySingleton instance;
  
  // Nontransient instance field 
  private String[] str = {"one", "two", "three"}; 
                 
  private MySingleton() {
    // Private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  public void displayStr() {
    System.out.println(Arrays.toString(str));
  }
 
  private Object readResolve() {
    return instance;
  }
}

"If a singleton contains a nontransient object reference field, the contents of this field will be deserialized before the singleton'€™s readResolve method is run. This allows a carefully crafted stream to 'steal' a reference to the originally deserialized singleton at the time the contents of the object reference field are deserialized" [Bloch 2008].

Compliant Solution (Enumeration Types)

Stateful singleton classes must be nonserializable. As a precautionary measure, classes that are serializable must not save a reference to a singleton object in their nontransient or nonstatic instance variables. This precaution prevents the singleton from being indirectly serialized.

Bloch [Bloch 2008] suggests the use of an enumeration type as a replacement for traditional implementations when serializable singletons are indispensable.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public enum MySingleton {
  ; // Empty list of enum values

  private static MySingleton instance;

  // Nontransient field class.

h2. Compliant Solution ({{enum}} types)

It is recommended that stateful singleton classes be made non-serializable. As a precautionary measure, classes that are serializable must never save a reference to a singleton object in their non-transient or non-static instance variables. This prevents the singleton from being indirectly serialized. 

Bloch \[[Bloch 08|AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\] suggests the use of an {{enum}} type as a replacement for traditional implementations when serializable singletons are indispensable. 

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
public enum MySingleton {
  INSTANCE;
  // Other methods
}
{code}

Functionally, this approach is equivalent to commonplace implementations and is safer. It ensures that only one instance of the object exists at any instant and also provides the serialization property as {{java.lang.Enum<E>}} extends {{java.io.Serializable}}.


h2. Noncompliant Code Example (non-transient instance fields)

This serializable noncompliant code example uses a non-transient instance field {{str}}.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 2787342337386756967L;
  private static MySingleton INSTANCE;
  private String[] str = {"one", "two", "three"};

  // non-transient instance fieldpublic void displayStr() {
                 
  private MySingleton() {
    // private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  public void displayStr() {
    SystemSystem.out.println(Arrays.toString(str));
  }	 
 
  private Object readResolve() {
    return INSTANCE;
  }
}
{code}

"If a singleton contains a nontransient object reference field, the contents of this field will be deserialized before the singleton’s {{readResolve}} method is run. This allows a carefully crafted stream to "steal" a reference to the originally deserialized singleton at the time the contents of the object reference field are deserialized." \[[Bloch 08|AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\].

h2. Noncompliant Code Example (transient fields)

This noncompliant code example declares the {{str}} instance field as {{transient}} so that it is not serialized.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton implements Serializable {
  // ...
  private transient String[] str = {"one", "two", "three"}; // non-transient field
  // ...
}
{code}

However, this is still insecure because of reasons described in the noncompliant code example ({{readResolve()}} method).

h2. Compliant Solution ({{enum}} types, non-transient fields)

This compliant solution uses the {{enum}} type to ensure that only one instance of the singleton exists at any time.

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
public enum MySingleton {
  INSTANCE;
  private String[] str = {"one", "two", "three"}; // non-transient field
     
  public void displayStr() {
    System.out.println(Arrays.toString(str));
  }	 
}
{code}

h2. Noncompliant Code Example (Cloneable singleton)

It is also possible to create a copy of the singleton by cloning it using the object's {{clone()}} method if the singleton class implements {{java.lang.Cloneable}} directly or through inheritance. This noncompliant code example shows a singleton that implements the {{java.lang.Cloneable}} interface.

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
class MySingleton implements Cloneable {
  private static MySingleton INSTANCE;

  private MySingleton() {
    // private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCE == null) {
      INSTANCE = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCE;
  }
}
{code}

h2. Compliant Solution (override {{clone()}} method)

Avoid making the singleton class cloneable by not implementing the {{Cloneable}} interface or not deriving from a class that already implements it. 

If the singleton class indirectly implements the {{Cloneable}} interface through inheritance, override the object's {{clone()}} method and throw a {{CloneNotSupportedException}} exception from within it \[[Daconta 03|AA. Java References#Daconta 03]\].

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
class MySingleton implements Cloneable {
  private static MySingleton INSTANCE;

  private MySingleton() {
    // private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (INSTANCE == null) {
      INSTANCE = new MySingleton();
    }
    return INSTANCE;
  }

  public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
    throw new CloneNotSupportedException();
  }
}
{code}

See [MSC05-J. Make sensitive classes noncloneable] for more details about restricting misuse of the {{clone()}} method.


h2. Noncompliant Code Example (garbage collection)

When the utility of a class is over, it is free to be garbage collected. This behavior can be troublesome when the program needs to maintain only one instance throughout its lifetime. 

A {{static}} singleton is garbage collected when its class loader becomes eligible for garbage collection. This usually happens when a nonstandard (custom) class loader is used to load the singleton. This noncompliant code example prints different values of the hashcode of the singleton object from different scopes. 

{code:bgColor=#FFcccc}
  {
    ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
    Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
    Method classMethod = class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
    Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { });
    System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
  }
  ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
  Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
  Method classMethod = class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
  Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { } );
  System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
{code}

{mc}
back-up code
  {
    ClassLoader cl1 = new FirstClassLoader();
    Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
    Method instanceMethod = class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
    Object singleton = instanceMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { } );
  }
  ClassLoader cl2 = new SecondClassLoader();
  Class class2 = cl2.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
  Method instanceMethod = class2.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
  Object singleton = instanceMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { } );
	
{mc}

Code that is outside the scope can create another instance of the singleton class though the requirement was to use only the original instance.


{mc}
// The following class produces the same hashcode from different scopes, so is safe

public class StaticClass {
  public void doSomething() {
     {
       MySingleton ms = new MySingleton();
       Object singleton = ms.getInstance();
       System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
     }
       MySingleton ms = new MySingleton();
       Object singleton = ms.getInstance();
       System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
  }
  
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    StaticClass sc = new StaticClass();
    sc.doSomething();
  }
}
{mc}

Because a singleton instance is associated with the class loader that is used to load it, it is possible to have multiple instances of the same class in the JVM. This typically happens in J2EE containers and applets. Technically, these instances are different classes that are independent of each other. Failing to protect against multiple instances of the singleton may or may not be insecure depending on the programmer's requirements.

h2. Compliant Solution (prevent garbage collection)

This compliant solution takes into account the garbage collection issue described above. A class is not garbage collected until the {{ClassLoader}} object used to load it becomes eligible for garbage collection. An easier scheme to prevent the garbage collection is to ensure that there is a direct or indirect reference from a live thread to the singleton object that needs to be preserved. 

This compliant solution demonstrates this technique and prints a consistent hashcode across all scopes.  It uses the {{ObjectPreserver}} class based on \[[Patterns 02|AA. Java References#Patterns 02]\] and described in [TSM02-J. Do not use background threads during class initialization].

{code:bgColor=#ccccff}
  {
    ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
    Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
    Method classMethod = class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
    Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { });
    ObjectPreserver.preserveObject(singleton); // Preserve the object
    System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
  }
  ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
  Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
  Method classMethod = class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
  Object singleton = ObjectPreserver.getObject();  // Retrieve the preserved object
  System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
{code}


h2. Risk Assessment

Using improper forms of the singleton design pattern may lead to creation of multiple instances of the singleton and violate the expected contract of the class.

|| Rule || Severity || Likelihood || Remediation Cost || Priority || Level ||
| CON23- J | low | unlikely | medium | {color:green}{*}P2{*}{color} | {color:green}{*}L3{*}{color} |

h3. Automated Detection

TODO

h3. Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the [CERT website|https://www.kb.cert.org/vulnotes/bymetric?searchview&query=FIELD+KEYWORDS+contains+CON32-J].


h2. References

\[[JLS 05|AA. Java References#JLS 05]\] [Chapter 17, Threads and Locks|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html]
\[[Fox 01|AA. Java References#Fox 01]\] [When is a Singleton not a Singleton?|http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/singletons/]&nbsp;
\[[Daconta 03|AA. Java References#Daconta 03]\] Item 15: Avoiding Singleton Pitfalls;
\[[Darwin 04|AA. Java References#Darwin 04]\] 9.10 Enforcing the Singleton Pattern
\[[Gamma 95|AA. Java References#Gamma 95]\] Singleton
\[[Patterns 02|AA. Java References#Patterns 02]\] Chapter 5, Creational Patterns, Singleton
\[[Bloch 08|AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\] Item 3: "Enforce the singleton property with a private constructor or an enum type" and Item 77: "For instance control, prefer enum types to readResolve"
\[[MITRE 09|AA. Java References#MITRE 09]\] [CWE ID 543|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/543.html] "Use of Singleton Pattern in a Non-thread-safe Manner"

----
[!The CERT Sun Microsystems Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_left.png!|MSC15-J. Use numerical comparison operators to terminate a loop whose counter changes by more than one]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[!The CERT Sun Microsystems Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_up.png!|49. Miscellaneous (MSC)]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[!The CERT Sun Microsystems Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_right.png!|MSC17-J. Detect and remove dead code]

}

This approach is functionally equivalent to, but much safer than, commonplace implementations. It both ensures that only one instance of the object exists at any instant and provides the serialization property (because java.lang.Enum<E> extends java.io.Serializable).

Noncompliant Code Example (Cloneable Singleton)

When the singleton class implements java.lang.Cloneable directly or through inheritance, it is possible to create a copy of the singleton by cloning it using the object's clone() method. This noncompliant code example shows a singleton that implements the java.lang.Cloneable interface.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
class MySingleton implements Cloneable {
  private static MySingleton instance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // Private constructor prevents
    // instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (instance == null) {
      instance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return instance;
  }
}

Compliant Solution (Override clone() Method)

To avoid making the singleton class cloneable, do not implement the Cloneable interface and do not derive from a class that already implements it.

When the singleton class must indirectly implement the Cloneable interface through inheritance, the object's clone() method must be overridden with one that throws a CloneNotSupportedException exception [Daconta 2003].

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
class MySingleton implements Cloneable {
  private static MySingleton instance;

  private MySingleton() {
    // Private constructor prevents instantiation by untrusted callers
  }

  // Lazy initialization
  public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
    if (instance == null) {
      instance = new MySingleton();
    }
    return instance;
  }

  public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
    throw new CloneNotSupportedException();
  }
}

See OBJ07-J. Sensitive classes must not let themselves be copied for more details about preventing misuse of the clone() method.

Noncompliant Code Example (Garbage Collection)

A class may be garbage-collected when it is no longer reachable. This behavior can be problematic when the program must maintain the singleton property throughout the entire lifetime of the program.

A static singleton becomes eligible for garbage collection when its class loader becomes eligible for garbage collection. This usually happens when a nonstandard (custom) class loader is used to load the singleton. This noncompliant code example prints different values of the hash code of the singleton object from different scopes:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
  {
  ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
  Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
  Method classMethod = 
      class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
  Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { });
  System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
}

ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
Method classMethod = 
    class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { } );
System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());

Code that is outside the scope can create another instance of the singleton class even though the requirement was to use only the original instance. 

Because a singleton instance is associated with the class loader that is used to load it, it is possible to have multiple instances of the same class in the Java Virtual Machine. This situation typically occurs in J2EE containers and applets. Technically, these instances are different classes that are independent of each other. Failure to protect against multiple instances of the singleton may or may not be insecure depending on the specific requirements of the program.

Compliant Solution (Prevent Garbage Collection)

This compliant solution takes into account the garbage-collection issue described previously. A class cannot be garbage-collected until the ClassLoader object used to load it becomes eligible for garbage collection. A simple scheme to prevent garbage collection is to ensure that there is a direct or indirect reference from a live thread to the singleton object that must be preserved.

This compliant solution demonstrates this technique. It prints a consistent hash code across all scopes. It uses the ObjectPreserver class [Grand 2002] described in TSM02-J. Do not use background threads during class initialization.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
 {
  ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
  Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
  Method classMethod = 
      class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
  Object singleton = classMethod.invoke(null, new Object[] { });
  ObjectPreserver.preserveObject(singleton); // Preserve the object
  System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());
}

ClassLoader cl1 = new MyClassLoader();
Class class1 = cl1.loadClass(MySingleton.class.getName());
Method classMethod = 
    class1.getDeclaredMethod("getInstance", new Class[] { });
// Retrieve the preserved object
Object singleton = ObjectPreserver.getObject();  
System.out.println(singleton.hashCode());

Risk Assessment

Using improper forms of the Singleton design pattern may lead to creation of multiple instances of the singleton and violate the expected contract of the class.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

MSC07-J

Low

Unlikely

Medium

P2

L3

Automated Detection

Tool
Version
Checker
Description
The Checker Framework

Include Page
The Checker Framework_V
The Checker Framework_V

Linear CheckerControl aliasing and prevent re-use (see Chapter 19)
Coverity7.5

SINGLETON_RACE
UNSAFE_LAZY_INIT
FB.LI_LAZY_INIT_UPDATE_STATIC
FB.LI_LAZY_INIT_STATIC

Implemented
Parasoft Jtest

Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V

CERT.MSC07.ILIMake lazy initializations thread-safe

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE

CWE-543, Use of Singleton Pattern without Synchronization in a Multithreaded Context

Bibliography

[Bloch 2008]

Item 3, "Enforce the Singleton Property with a Private Constructor or an enum Type"
Item 77, "For Instance Control, Prefer enum Types to readResolve"

[Daconta 2003]

Item 15, "Avoiding Singleton Pitfalls"

[Darwin 2004]

Section 9.10, "Enforcing the Singleton Pattern"

[Fox 2001]

When Is a Singleton Not a Singleton? 

[Gamma 1995]

Singleton

[Grand 2002]

Chapter 5, "Creational Patterns," section "Singleton"

[JLS 2015]

Chapter 17, "Threads and Locks"


...

Image Added Image Added Image Added