Page History

Wiki MarkupImmutable objects should be {{const}}\-qualified. Enforcing object immutability using {{const}}\- qualification helps ensure the correctness and security of applications. ISO/IEC DTR TR 24772, for example, recommends labeling parameters as constant to avoid the unintentional modification of function arguments \ [[ISO/IEC DTR 24772|AA. References#ISO/ISO/IEC DTR 24772]\]. [TR 24772]. STR05-C. Use pointers to const when referring to string literals] describes a specialized case of this recommendation.

Adding const qualification may propagate through a program; as you add const, qualifiers , become still more become necessary. This phenomenon is sometimes called const poisoning, which can frequently lead to violations of EXP05-C. Do not cast away a const qualification. While Although const qualification is a good idea, the costs may outweigh the value in the remediation of existing code.

Macros, A macro or an enumeration constant , may also be used instead of a const-qualified object. DCL06-C. Use meaningful symbolic constants to represent literal values describes the relative merits of using const-qualified objects, enumeration constants, and object-like macros. However, adding a const qualifier to an existing variable is a better first step than replacing the variable with an enumeration constant or macro , because the compiler will issue warnings on any code that changes your const-qualified variable. Once you have verified that a const-qualified variable is not changed by any code, you may consider changing it to an enumeration constant or macro, as best fits your design.

...

In this noncompliant code, pi is declared as a float. Although pi is a mathematical constant, its value is not protected from accidental modification.

float pi = 3.14159f;
float degrees;
float radians;
/* ... */
radians = degrees * pi / 180;

...

In this compliant solution, pi is declared as a const-qualified object.:

const float pi = 3.14159f;
float degrees;
float radians;
/* ... */
radians = degrees * pi / 180;

Exceptions

DCL00-EX1: It is acceptable to define valueless macros to serve as 'inclusion guards'. That is, the macro serves to control the multiple inclusion of header files, as in the following example:

#ifndef SOME_HEADER_H
#define SOME_HEADER_H
...  // content of header file
#endif

See PRE06-C. Enclose header files in an inclusion guard for more information on inclusion guards.

Risk Assessment

Failing to const-qualify immutable objects can result in a constant being modified at runtime.

Automated Detection

Compass/ROSE can detect most violations of this recommendation.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Other Languages

...

Related Guidelines

...

...

...

 Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added

This rule appears in the Java Secure Coding Standard as DCL04-J. Declare mathematical constants as static and final

References

\[[Dewhurst 02|AA. References#Dewhurst 02]\] Gotcha #25, "#define Literals"
\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers"
\[[Saks 00|AA. References#Saks 00]\]

02. Declarations and Initialization (DCL)      02. Declarations and Initialization (DCL)      Image Modified