Immutable (constant values) should be declared as const
-qualified objects (unmodifiable lvalues), enumerations values, or as a last resort, a #define
.
In general, it is preferable to declare immutable values as const
-qualified objects rather than as macro definitions. Using a const
declared value means that the compiler is able to check the type of the object, the object has scope, and (certain) debugging tools can show the name of the object. const
-qualified objects cannot be used where compile-time integer constants are required, namely to define the:
- size of a bit-field member of a structure
- size of an array (except in the case of variable length arrays)
- value of an enumeration constant
- value of a
case
constant.
If any of these are required, then an integer constant (an rvalue) must be used. For integer constants, it is preferable to use an enum
instead of a const
-qualified object as this eliminates the possibility of taking the address of the integer constant and does not required that storage is allocated for the value.
This recommendation is related to EXP10-A. Do not diminish the benefits of constants by assuming their values in expressions.
Non-Compliant Code (object-like macro)
A preprocessing directive of the form:
#
define
identifier replacement-list new-line
defines an object-like macro that causes each subsequent instance of the macro name to be replaced by the replacement list of preprocessing tokens that constitute the remainder of the directive [[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]].
In this non-compliant code example, PI
is defined as an object-like macro. Following the definition, each subsequent occurrence of the string "PI" is replaced by the string "3.14159" by textual substitution.
#define PI 3.14159 float degrees; float radians; /* // ... */ radians = degrees * PI / 180;
An unsuffixed floating constant, as in this example, has type double
. If suffixed by the letter f
or F
, it has type float
. If suffixed by the letter l
or L
, it has type long double
.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, pi
is declared as a const
-qualified object, allowing the constant to have scope.
float const pi = 3.14159; float degrees; float radians; /* // ... */ radians = degrees * pi / 180;
While inadequate in some ways, this is the best that can be done for non-integer constants.
Non-Compliant Code Example (immutable integer values)
In this non-compliant code example, max
is declared as a const
-qualified object. While declaring non-integer constants as const
-qualified object is the best that can be done in C, for integer constants we can do better. Declaring immutable integer values as const
-qualified objects still allows the programmer to take the address of the object. Also, const
-qualified integers cannot be used in locations where an integer constant is required, such as the value of a case
constant.
int const max = 15; int a[max]; /* invalid declaration outside of a function */ int const *p; p = &max; /* legal to take the address of a const-qualified object */
Most C compilers allocate memory for const
-qualified objects.
Compliant Solution (enum)
This compliant solution declares max
as an enum
rather than a const
-qualified object or a macro definition.
enum { max = 15 }; int a[max]; /* OK */ int const *p; p = &max; /* error: '&' on constant */
Risk Assessment
Failing to declare immutable values using const
or enum
can result in a value intended to be constant being changed at runtime.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL00-A |
1 (low) |
1 (unlikely) |
2 (medium) |
P2 |
L3 |
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]] Section 6.3.2.1, "Lvalues, arrays, and function designators," Section 6.7.2.2, "Enumeration specifiers," and Section 6.10.3, "Macro replacement"