The C++ Standard, [except.handle], paragraph 4 [ISO/IEC 14882-2014], states:
The handlers for a try block are tried in order of appearance. That makes it possible to write handlers that can never be executed, for example by placing a handler for a derived class after a handler for a corresponding base class.
Consequently, if two handlers catch exceptions that are derived from the same base class (such as std::exception
), the most derived exception must come first.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the first handler catches all exceptions of class B
, as well as exceptions of class D
, since they are also of class B
. Consequently, the second handler does not catch any exceptions.
// Classes used for exception handling class B {}; class D : public B {}; void f() { try { // ... } catch (B &b) { // ... } catch (D &d) { // ... } }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the first handler catches all exceptions of class D
, and the second handler catches all the other exceptions of class B
.
// Classes used for exception handling class B {}; class D : public B {}; void f() { try { // ... } catch (D &d) { // ... } catch (B &b) { // ... } }
Risk Assessment
Exception handlers with inverted priorities cause unexpected control flow when an exception of the derived type occurs.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERR54-CPP | Medium | Likely | Low | P18 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Clang | 3.9 | -Wexceptions | |
1.2 | CP1.ERR36 | Fully implemented | |
PRQA QA-C++ | 4.4 | 4040, 4034 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for other vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
[MISRA 08] | Rule 15-3-6 (Required) |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 14882-2014] | Subclause 15.3, "Handling an Exception" |