You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 48 Next »

Java supports overloading methods and can distinguish between methods with different method signatures, which means that, with some qualifications, methods within a class can have the same name if they have different parameter lists. In method overloading, the method to be invoked at runtime is determined at compile time. Consequently, the overloaded method associated with the static type of the object is invoked even when the runtime type differs for each invocation.

Do not introduce ambiguity while overloading (see MET50-JG. Avoid ambiguous uses of overloading), and use overloaded methods sparingly [Tutorials 2008], because they can make code much less readable.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example attempts to use the overloaded display() method to perform different actions depending on whether the method is passed an ArrayList<Integer> or a LinkedList<String>.

public class Overloader {
  private static String display(ArrayList<Integer> arrayList) {
    return "ArrayList";
  }

  private static String display(LinkedList<String> linkedList) {
    return "LinkedList";
  }

  private static String display(List<?> list) {
    return "List is not recognized";
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    // Single ArrayList
    System.out.println(display(new ArrayList<Integer>()));
    // Array of lists
    List<?>[] invokeAll = new List<?>[] {new ArrayList<Integer>(), 
    new LinkedList<String>(), new Vector<Integer>()};

    for (List<?> list : invokeAll) {
      System.out.println(display(list));
    }
  }
}

At compile time, the type of the object array is List. The expected output is ArrayList, ArrayList, LinkedList, and List is not recognized (because java.util.Vector does not inherit from java.util.List). The actual output is ArrayList followed by three instances of List is not recognized. The cause of this unexpected behavior is that overloaded method invocations are affected only by the compile-time type of their arguments: ArrayList for the first invocation and List for the others. Do not use overloading where overriding would be natural [Bloch 2008].

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution uses a single display method and instanceof to distinguish between different types. As expected, the output is ArrayList, ArrayList, LinkedList, List is not recognized.

class Overloader {
public class Overloader {
  private static String display(List<?> list) {
    return (
      list instanceof ArrayList ? "Arraylist" : 
      (list instanceof LinkedList ? "LinkedList" : 
      "List is not recognized")
    );
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    // Single ArrayList
    System.out.println(display(new ArrayList<Integer>()));

    List<?>[] invokeAll = new List<?>[] {new ArrayList<Integer>(), 
    new LinkedList<String>(), new Vector<Integer>()};

    for (List<?> list : invokeAll) {
      System.out.println(display(list));
    }
  }
}

Applicability

Ambiguous uses of overloading can lead to unexpected results.

Bibliography

 


  • No labels