According to [JLS Section 8.4.8.3, Requirements in Overriding and Hiding]:
"The access modifier of an overriding or hiding method must provide at least as much access as the overridden or hidden method, or a compile-time error occurs."
The allowed accesses are:
Overridden/hidden method modifier |
Overriding/hiding method modifier |
---|---|
public |
public |
protected |
protected or public |
default |
default or protected or private |
private |
Cannot be overridden |
This also means that there is potential for some functionality having a restrictive modifier to be overridden by a less restrictive modifier.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example exemplifies how a malicious subclass Sub
can override the doLogic
method of the super class. Any user of Sub
will be able to invoke the doLogic
method since the base class BadScope
defined it with the protected
access modifier. The class Sub
can allow more access than BadScope
by using the public
modifier.
class BadScope { protected void doLogic() { System.out.println("Super invoked"); } } public class Sub extends BadScope { public void doLogic() { System.out.println("Sub invoked"); //do restrictive operations } }
Compliant Solution
Do not override a method unless absolutely necessary. Declare all methods and fields final
to avoid malicious subclassing. This is in compliance with the tenets of OBJ31-J. Do not use public static non-final variables and OBJ00-J. Declare data members private.
class BadScope { private final void doLogic() { System.out.println("Super invoked"); } }
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example overrides the finalize()
method of the superclass Base
, and changes its accessibility from protected
to public
.
According to Sun's Secure Coding Guidelines [[SCG 07]]:
In addition, refrain from increasing the accessibility of an inherited method, as doing so may break assumptions made by the superclass. A class that overrides the protected java.lang.Object.finalize method and declares that method public, for example, enables hostile callers to finalize an instance of that class, and to call methods on that instance after it has been finalized. A superclass implementation unprepared to handle such a call sequence could throw runtime exceptions that leak private information, or that leave the object in an invalid state that compromises security. One noteworthy exception to this guideline pertains to classes that implement the java.lang.Cloneable interface. In these cases, the accessibility of the Object.clone method should be increased from protected to public.
final class SubClass extends Base { public void finalize() { // ... } }
Compliant SOlution
This compliant solution correctly declares the finalize()
method protected
. It is not possible to further limit the accessibility as Object
's finalize
method itself is declared protected
.
final class SubClass extends Base { protected void finalize() { // ... } }
Risk Assessment
Subclassing allows access restrictions to be weakened, possibly compromising the security of a Java application.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCP01-J |
medium |
probable |
medium |
P8 |
L2 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
[[JLS 05]] Section 8.4.8.3, Requirements in Overriding and Hiding
[[MITRE 09]] CWE ID 487 "Reliance on Package-level Scope"
SCP00-J. Use as minimal scope as possible for all variables and methods 04. Scope (SCP) SCP02-J. Do not expose private members of the outer class from within a nested class