You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 172 Next »

Reading a shared primitive variable in one thread may not yield the value of the most recent write to the variable from another thread. Consequently, the thread may observe a stale value of the shared variable. To ensure the visibility of the most recent update, either the variable must be declared volatile or the reads and writes must be synchronized.

Declaring a shared variable volatile guarantees visibility in a thread-safe manner only when both of the following conditions are met:

The first condition can be relaxed when you can be sure that only one thread will ever update the value of the variable [[Goetz 2006]]. However, code that relies on a single-thread confinement is error-prone and difficult to maintain. This design approach is permitted under this rule, but is discouraged.

Synchronizing the code makes it easier to reason about its behavior and is frequently more secure than simply using the volatile keyword. However, synchronization has somewhat higher performance overhead and can result in thread contention and deadlocks when used excessively.

Declaring a variable volatile or correctly synchronizing the code both guarantee that 64-bit primitive long and double variables will be accessed atomically. (For more information on sharing those variables among multiple threads, see rule VNA05-J. Ensure atomicity when reading and writing 64-bit values.)

Noncompliant Code Example (Non-Volatile Flag)

This noncompliant code example uses a shutdown() method to set a non-volatile done flag that is checked in the run() method.

final class ControlledStop implements Runnable {
  private boolean done = false;
 
  @Override public void run() {
    while (!done) {
      try {
        // ...
        Thread.currentThread().sleep(1000); // Do something
      } catch(InterruptedException ie) { 
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
      } 
    } 	 
  }

  public void shutdown() {
    done = true;
  }
}

If one thread invokes the shutdown() method to set the flag, a second thread might not observe that change. Consequently, the second thread may observe that done is still false and incorrectly invoke the sleep() method. Compilers and JITs are allowed to optimize the code when they determine that the value of done is never modified by the same thread, resulting in an infinite loop.

Compliant Solution (volatile)

In this compliant solution, the done flag is declared volatile to ensure that writes are visible to other threads.

final class ControlledStop implements Runnable {
  private volatile boolean done = false;
 
  @Override public void run() {
    while (!done) {
      try {
        // ...
        Thread.currentThread().sleep(1000); // Do something
      } catch(InterruptedException ie) { 
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
      } 
    } 	 
  }

  public void shutdown() {
    done = true;
  }
}

Compliant Solution (java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean)

In this compliant solution, the done flag is declared AtomicBoolean. Atomic types also guarantee that writes are visible to other threads.

final class ControlledStop implements Runnable {
  private final AtomicBoolean done = new AtomicBoolean(false);
 
  @Override public void run() {
    while (!done.get()) {
      try {
        // ...
        Thread.currentThread().sleep(1000); // Do something
      } catch(InterruptedException ie) { 
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
      } 
    } 	 
  }

  public void shutdown() {
    done.set(true);
  }
}

Compliant Solution (synchronized)

This compliant solution uses the intrinsic lock of the Class object to ensure that updates become visible to other threads.

final class ControlledStop implements Runnable {
  private boolean done = false;
 
  @Override public void run() {
    while (!isDone()) {
      try {
        // ...
        Thread.currentThread().sleep(1000); // Do something
      } catch(InterruptedException ie) { 
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
      } 
    } 	 
  }

  public synchronized boolean isDone() {
    return done;
  }

  public synchronized void shutdown() {
    done = true;
  }
}

While this is an acceptable compliant solution, intrinsic locks cause threads to block and may introduce contention. On the other hand, volatile-qualified shared variables do not block. Excessive synchronization can also make the program prone to deadlock.

Synchronization is a more secure alternative in situations where the volatile keyword or a java.util.concurrent.atomic.Atomic* field is inappropriate, such as if a variable's new value depends on its current value. For more information, see rule VNA02-J. Ensure that compound operations on shared variables are atomic.

Compliance with rule LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code can reduce the likelihood of misuse by ensuring that untrusted callers cannot access the lock object.

Exceptions

VNA00-EX0: Class objects are created by the virtual machine; their initialization always precedes any subsequent use. Consequently, cross-thread visibility of Class objects is already assured by default

Risk Assessment

Failing to ensure the visibility of a shared primitive variable may result in a thread observing a stale value of the variable.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

VNA00-J

medium

probable

medium

P8

L2

Automated Detection

The following table summarizes the examples flagged as violations by SureLogic Flashlight:

Noncompliant Code Example

Flagged

Message

non-volatile flag

Yes

Instance fields with empty locksets

The following table summarizes the examples flagged as violations by SureLogic JSure:

Noncompliant Code Example

Flagged

Required Annotation

Message

non-volatile flag

Yes

@RegionLock("ControlledStop is this protects Instance")

Reports three issues: Lock "<this>:ControlledStop" not held when accessing (this.done), done = false and (this.done)

The unprotected field can be observed through its graphical user interface (GUI).

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE

CWE-667, "Improper Locking"

 

CWE-413, "Improper Resource Locking"

 

CWE-567, "Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context"

Bibliography

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="cb3108ce-4432-445b-a912-383943c509ee"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Bloch 2008

AA. Bibliography#Bloch 08]]

Item 66: Synchronize access to shared mutable data

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="bbdf3cc4-e567-42f4-a070-7a1ae6423a69"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Goetz 2006

AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]]

3.4.2. "Example: Using Volatile to Publish Immutable Objects"

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="efe9fb8c-a662-499f-b34c-c586c3d3bcde"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[JLS 2005

AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]]

[Chapter 17, Threads and Locks

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html]]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

 

§17.4.5 Happens-Before Order

 

§17.4.3 Programs and Program Order

 

§17.4.8 Executions and Causality Requirements

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="301a5a0a-6f95-480e-8e63-1fcd25d64f1f"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[JPL 2006

AA. Bibliography#JPL 06]]

14.10.3. "The Happens-Before Relationship"

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>


07. Visibility and Atomicity (VNA)      07. Visibility and Atomicity (VNA)      

  • No labels