According to the Java API [[API 06]] class java.lang.Object
documentation:
If two objects are equal according to the
equals(Object)
method, then calling thehashCode
method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
Failure to follow this contract is a common source of bugs. Notably, immutable objects are exempt because they need not override the hashcode()
method.
Noncompliant Code Example
Even when the equals()
method conveys logical equivalence between classes, the hashCode()
method returns distinct numbers as opposed to returning the same values. Its contract requires it to return the same values for equal objects. This noncompliant code example stores a credit card number into a HashMap
and retrieves it. The expected retrieved value is Java
, however, null
is returned instead. The reason for this erroneous behavior is that the hashCode()
method is not overridden which means that a different bucket would be looked into than the one used to store the original value.
public final class CreditCard { private final int number; public CreditCard(int number) { this.number = (short) number; } public boolean equals(Object o) { if (o == this) { return true; } if (!(o instanceof CreditCard)) { return false; } CreditCard cc = (CreditCard)o; return cc.number == number; } public static void main(String[] args) { Map<CreditCard, String> m = new HashMap<CreditCard, String>(); m.put(new CreditCard(100), "Java"); // Assuming Integer.MAX_VALUE is the largest number for card System.out.println(m.get(new CreditCard(100))); } }
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution shows how the hashCode()
method can be overridden so that the same value is generated for any two instances that compare equal when Object.equals()
is used. Bloch discusses the recipe to generate such a hash function in good detail [[Bloch 08]].
import java.util.Map; import java.util.HashMap; public final class CreditCard { private final int number; public CreditCard(int number) { this.number = (short) number; } public boolean equals(Object o) { if (o == this) { return true; } if (!(o instanceof CreditCard)) { return false; } CreditCard cc = (CreditCard)o; return cc.number == number; } public int hashCode() { int result = 7; result = 37 * result + number; return result; } public static void main(String[] args) { Map<CreditCard, String> m = new HashMap<CreditCard, String>(); m.put(new CreditCard(100), "Java"); System.out.println(m.get(new CreditCard(100))); } }
Risk Assessment
Overriding the equals()
method without overriding the hashCode()
method can lead to unexpected results.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET13- J |
low |
unlikely |
high |
P1 |
L3 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
[[API 06]] Class Object
[[Bloch 08]] Item 9: Always override hashCode
when you override equals
[[MITRE 09]] CWE ID 581 "Object Model Violation: Just One of Equals and Hashcode Defined"
MET12-J. Follow the general contract while overriding the equals method 12. Methods (MET) MET14-J. Follow the general contract when implementing the compareTo method