Mutexes are used to prevent multiple threads from causing a data race by accessing shared resources at the same time. Sometimes, when locking mutexes, multiple threads hold each other's lock, and the program consequently deadlocks. Four conditions are required for deadlock to occur:
- Mutual exclusion
- Hold and wait
- No preemption
- Circular wait
Deadlock needs all four conditions, so preventing deadlock requires preventing any one of the four conditions. One simple solution is to lock the mutexes in a predefined order, which prevents circular wait.
Noncompliant Code Example
The behavior of this noncompliant code example depends on the runtime environment and the platform's scheduler. The program is susceptible to deadlock if thread thr1
attempts to lock ba2
's mutex at the same time thread thr2
attempts to lock ba1
's mutex in the deposit()
function.
#include <stdlib.h> #include <threads.h> typedef struct { int balance; mtx_t balance_mutex; } bank_account; typedef struct { bank_account *from; bank_account *to; int amount; } transaction; void create_bank_account(bank_account **ba, int initial_amount) { bank_account *nba = (bank_account *)malloc( sizeof(bank_account) ); if (nba == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } nba->balance = initial_amount; if (thrd_success != mtx_init(&nba->balance_mutex, mtx_plain)) { /* Handle error */ } *ba = nba; } int deposit(void *ptr) { transaction *args = (transaction *)ptr; if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(&args->from->balance_mutex)) { /* Handle error */ } /* Not enough balance to transfer */ if (args->from->balance < args->amount) { if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&args->from->balance_mutex)) { /* Handle error */ } return -1; /* Indicate error */ } if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(&args->to->balance_mutex)) { /* Handle error */ } args->from->balance -= args->amount; args->to->balance += args->amount; if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&args->from->balance_mutex)) { /* Handle error */ } if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&args->to->balance_mutex)) { /* Handle error */ } free(ptr); return 0; } int main(void) { thrd_t thr1, thr2; transaction *arg1; transaction *arg2; bank_account *ba1; bank_account *ba2; create_bank_account(&ba1, 1000); create_bank_account(&ba2, 1000); arg1 = (transaction *)malloc(sizeof(transaction)); if (arg1 == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } arg2 = (transaction *)malloc(sizeof(transaction)); if (arg2 == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } arg1->from = ba1; arg1->to = ba2; arg1->amount = 100; arg2->from = ba2; arg2->to = ba1; arg2->amount = 100; /* Perform the deposits */ if (thrd_success != thrd_create(&thr1, deposit, (void *)arg1)) { /* Handle error */ } if (thrd_success != thrd_create(&thr2, deposit, (void *)arg2)) { /* Handle error */ } return 0; }
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution eliminates the circular wait condition by establishing a predefined order for locking in the deposit()
function. Each thread will lock on the basis of the bank_account
ID, which is set when the bank_account struct
is initialized.
#include <stdlib.h> #include <threads.h> typedef struct { int balance; mtx_t balance_mutex; /* Should not change after initialization */ unsigned int id; } bank_account; typedef struct { bank_account *from; bank_account *to; int amount; } transaction; unsigned int global_id = 1; void create_bank_account(bank_account **ba, int initial_amount) { bank_account *nba = (bank_account *)malloc( sizeof(bank_account) ); if (nba == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } nba->balance = initial_amount; if (thrd_success != mtx_init(&nba->balance_mutex, mtx_plain)) { /* Handle error */ } nba->id = global_id++; *ba = nba; } int deposit(void *ptr) { transaction *args = (transaction *)ptr; int result = -1; mtx_t *first; mtx_t *second; if (args->from->id == args->to->id) { return -1; /* Indicate error */ } /* Ensure proper ordering for locking */ if (args->from->id < args->to->id) { first = &args->from->balance_mutex; second = &args->to->balance_mutex; } else { first = &args->to->balance_mutex; second = &args->from->balance_mutex; } if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(first)) { /* Handle error */ } if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(second)) { /* Handle error */ } /* Not enough balance to transfer */ if (args->from->balance >= args->amount) { args->from->balance -= args->amount; args->to->balance += args->amount; result = 0; } if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(second)) { /* Handle error */ } if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(first)) { /* Handle error */ } free(ptr); return result; }
Risk Assessment
Deadlock prevents multiple threads from progressing, halting program execution. A denial-of-service attack is possible if the attacker can create the conditions for deadlock.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON35-C | Low | Probable | Medium | P4 | L3 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Astrée | 24.04 | deadlock | Supported by sound analysis (deadlock alarm) |
CodeSonar | 8.1p0 | CONCURRENCY.LOCK.ORDER | Conflicting lock order |
Coverity | 2017.07 | ORDER_REVERSAL | Fully implemented |
Cppcheck Premium | 24.9.0 | premium-cert-con35-c | Partially implemented |
Helix QAC | 2024.3 | C1772, C1773 | |
Klocwork | 2024.3 | CONC.DL | |
Parasoft C/C++test | 2023.1 | CERT_C-CON35-a | Do not acquire locks in different order |
PC-lint Plus | 1.4 | 2462 | Fully supported |
Polyspace Bug Finder | R2024a | CERT C: Rule CON35-C | Checks for deadlock (rule partially covered) |
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|---|---|
CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java | LCK07-J. Avoid deadlock by requesting and releasing locks in the same order | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
6 Comments
Robert Seacord (Manager)
1. i don't think thread execution is random, exactly. can you state this more precisely?
2. you don't need an introduction header, and the introductory section should state precisely what the guideline is: the developer should do something or should not do something. The guideline should be written to be enforceable. The title and the intro is the statement of the guideline; everything else is an example.
3. The references are not correctly formatted.
4. I don't think that 4 is a level. Take another look at how priority and level are calculated.
5. I'll try to look at the technical content in depth later.
David Svoboda
In addition to Rob's comments, I have one:
PENGFEI LI
I have updated my code to have a more concrete example, and I believe all the problems stated has been addressed.
David Svoboda
The example is better. More comments:
code
tags when discussing code snippets in prose, eg: thefoo()
function.arg1
andarg2
in NCCE. Also need to check for errors in the various pthread routines.id
field should be declared const.PENGFEI LI
I was thinking about having id as const, but I don't think there is a way to dynamically allocate a struct and set its const variable. But I might be wrong.
David Svoboda
As far as struct initialization goes, I think you're right. The way to do it in C++ is to use a class (rather than a struct), and then your id can be const, and initialized by the constructor. Using a class is better than a struct, since you can make the fields private, improving encapsulation.