You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 136 Current »

An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the implementation or have other unknown side effects. Referencing a volatile object by using a non-volatile lvalue is undefined behavior. The C Standard, 6.7.4 paragraph 7 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024], states

If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.

See undefined behavior 65.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior:

#include <stdio.h>
 
void func(void) {
  static volatile int **ipp;
  static int *ip;
  static volatile int i = 0;

  printf("i = %d.\n", i);

  ipp = &ip; /* May produce a warning diagnostic */
  ipp = (int**) &ip; /* Constraint violation; may produce a warning diagnostic */
  *ipp = &i; /* Valid */
  if (*ip != 0) { /* Valid */
    /* ... */
  }
}

The assignment ipp = &ip is not safe because it allows the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i through the non-volatile-qualified reference ip. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if block because *ip != 0 must be false if the object to which ip points is not volatile.

Implementation Details

This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 when compiled in C mode (/TC) but causes errors when compiled in C++ mode (/TP).

GCC 4.8.1 generates a warning but compiles successfully.

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, ip is declared volatile:

#include <stdio.h>

void func(void) {
  static volatile int **ipp;
  static volatile int *ip;
  static volatile int i = 0;

  printf("i = %d.\n", i);

  ipp = &ip;
  *ipp = &i;
  if (*ip != 0) {
    /* ... */
  }

}

Risk Assessment

Accessing an object with a volatile-qualified type through a reference with a non-volatile-qualified type is undefined behavior.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXP32-C

Low

Likely

Medium

P6

L2

Automated Detection

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

Astrée
24.04

pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile

pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit

Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8
Axivion Bauhaus Suite

7.2.0

CertC-EXP32Fully implemented
Clang
3.9
-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers
Compass/ROSE




Coverity
2017.07

MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8

Implemented
Cppcheck Premium

24.9.0

premium-cert-exp32-cPartially implemented
GCC
4.3.5


Can detect violations of this rule when the -Wcast-qual flag is used

Helix QAC

2024.3

C0312, C0562, C0563, C0673, C0674Fully implemented
Klocwork
2024.3

CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.ADDR
CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.ADDR.PARAM
CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.PTRPTR

Fully implemented
LDRA tool suite
9.7.1

344 S

Partially implemented

Parasoft C/C++test
2023.1
CERT_C-EXP32-a

A cast shall not remove any 'const' or 'volatile' qualification from the type of a pointer or reference

Polyspace Bug Finder

R2024a

CERT C: Rule EXP32-C

Checks for cast to pointer that removes const or volatile qualification (rule fully covered)

RuleChecker

24.04

pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile

pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit
Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

Taxonomy

Taxonomy item

Relationship

ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013Pointer Casting and Pointer Type Changes [HFC]Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013Type System [IHN]Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
MISRA C:2012Rule 11.8 (required)Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
CERT CEXP55-CPP. Do not access a cv-qualified object through a cv-unqualified typePrior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship

Bibliography

[ISO/IEC 9899:2024]6.7.4, "Type Qualifiers"



  • No labels