The basic_string
template class has unusual invalidation semantics. References, pointers, and iterators referring to the elements of a basic_string
sequence may be invalidated by the following uses of that basic_string
object:
- As an argument to non-member functions
swap()
,operator>>()
, andgetline()
. - As an argument to
basic_string::swap()
. - Calling
data()
andc_str()
member functions. Calling non-const member functions, except
operator[]()
,at()
,begin()
,rbegin()
,end()
, andrend()
.Subsequent to any of the above uses except the forms of
insert()
anderase()
which return iterators, the first call to non-const member functionsoperator[]()
,at()
,begin()
,rbegin()
,end()
, orrend()
.
Non-Compliant Example
Compliant Example
The relationship between size and capacity makes it possible to predict when a call to a non-const member function will cause a string to perform a reallocation. This in turn makes it possible to predice when an insertion will invalidate references, pointers, and iterators (to anything other than the end of the string).
In the following example, the call to push_back() does not invalidate the iterator.
string s; ... if ( s.size() < s.capacity() ) { s.push_back('x'); }
If instead of performing a push_back(), the code were to insert into an arbitrary location in the string, all references, pointers, and iterators from the insertion point to the end of the string are invalidated.
Exceptions
The intent of these iterator invalidation rules is to give implementors greater freedom in implementation techniques. Some implementations implement method version that do not invalidate references, pointers, and iterators in all cases. Check with your implementation specific documentation and document any violation of the semantics specified by the standard for portability.
References
- ISO/IEC 14882-2003 21.3 Class template basic_string