It is highly unlikely that a method is built to deal with all possible runtime exceptions. Consequently, no method should ever catch RuntimeException
. If a method catches RuntimeException
, it may receive exceptions it was not designed to handle, such as NullPointerException
. Many catch
clauses simply log or ignore the enclosed exceptional condition, and normal execution resumes. Runtime exceptions indicate bugs in the program that should be fixed by the developer. They almost always lead to control flow vulnerabilities. Likewise, a method should never catch Exception
or Throwable
, because this implies catching RuntimeException
(RuntimeException
extends Exception
which in turn extends Throwable
).
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example takes a String
argument and returns true
if it consists of a capital letter succeeded by lowercase letters. To handle corner cases, it merely wraps the code in a try-catch
block and reports any exceptions that may arise.
boolean isCapitalized(String s) { try { if (s.equals("")) { return true; } String first = s.substring( 0, 1); String rest = s.substring( 1); return (first.equals (first.toUpperCase()) && rest.equals (rest.toLowerCase())); } catch (RuntimeException exception) { ExceptionReporter.report(exception); } return false; }
This code reports a null pointer exception condition if s
is a null pointer. However, it also unintentionally catches other exceptions that are unlikely to be handled properly, such as an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
resulting from an out of bounds index.
Compliant Solution
Instead of catching RuntimeException
, the program should be as specific as possible in catching exceptions.
boolean isCapitalized(String s) { try { if (s.equals("")) { return true; } String first = s.substring(0, 1); String rest = s.substring(1); return (first.equals (first.toUpperCase()) && rest.equals (rest.toLowerCase())); } catch (NullPointerException exception) { ExceptionReporter.report (exception); } return false; }
This code only catches those exceptions that are intended to be caught. For example, a null pointer exception is caught whereas an index-out-of-bounds exception is not caught.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example handles a divide by zero exception initially. Instead of the specific exception type ArithmeticException
, a more generic type Exception
is caught. This is dangerous as any future exception declaration updates to the method signature (such as, addition of IOException
) may no longer require the developer to provide a corresponding handler. Consequently, the recovery process may not be tailored to the specific exception type that is thrown. Furthermore, unchecked exceptions under RuntimeException
are also unintentionally caught whenever the top level Exception
class is caught.
public class DivideException { public static void main(String[] args) { try { division(200, 5); division(200, 0); // Divide by zero } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println("Divide by zero exception : " + e.getMessage()); } } public static void division(int totalSum, int totalNumber) throws ArithmeticException, IOException { int average = totalSum/totalNumber; // Additional operations that may throw IOException... System.out.println("Average: " + average); } }
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example improves by catching a specific divide-by-zero exception but fails on the premise that it unscrupulously accepts other undesirable runtime exceptions, by catching Exception
.
try { division(200,5); division(200,0); // Divide by zero } catch (ArithmeticException ae) { throw new DivideByZeroException(); } catch (Exception e) { // DivideByZeroException extends Exception so is checked System.out.println("Exception occurred :" + e.getMessage()); }
Compliant Solution
To be compliant, catch specific exception types especially when the types differ significantly. Here, ArithmeticException
and IOException
have been unbundled because they fall under very diverse categories.
import java.io.IOException; public class DivideException { public static void main(String[] args) { try { division(200,5); division(200,0); // Divide by zero } catch (ArithmeticException ae) { throw new DivideByZeroException(); // DivideByZeroException extends Exception so is checked } catch (IOException ie) { System.out.println("I/O Exception occurred :" + ie.getMessage()); } } public static void division(int totalSum, int totalNumber) throws ArithmeticException, IOException { int average = totalSum/totalNumber; // Additional operations that may throw IOException... System.out.println("Average: "+ average); } }
DivideByZeroException
is a custom exception type that extends Exception
.
Exceptions
EXC32-J-EX1: A secure application must also abide by [EXC06-J. Do not allow exceptions to transmit sensitive information]. To follow this rule, an application might find it necessary to catch all exceptions at some top-level to sanitize (or suppress) them. This is also summarized in the CWE entries, CWE 7 and CWE 388. If exceptions need to be caught, it is better to catch Throwable
instead of Exception
[[Roubtsov 03]].
Risk Assessment
Catching RuntimeException
traps several types of exceptions not intended to be caught. This prevents them from being handled properly.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXC14- J |
low |
likely |
medium |
P6 |
L2 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
[[MITRE 09]] CWE ID 396 "Declaration of Catch for Generic Exception", CWE ID 7 "J2EE Misconfiguration: Missing Error Handling", CWE ID 537 "Information Leak Through Java Runtime Error Message", CWE ID 536 "Information Leak Through Servlet Runtime Error Message"
[[Schweisguth 03]]
[[JLS 05]] Chapter 11, Exceptions
[[Tutorials 08]] Exceptions
[[Doshi 03]]
[[Muller 02]]
EXC13-J. Throw specific exceptions as opposed to the more general RuntimeException or Exception 13. Exceptional Behavior (EXC) EXC15-J. Do not catch NullPointerException