Sometimes null
is returned intentionally to account for zero available instances. This practice can lead to vulnerabilities when the client code does not handle the null
return case.
Noncompliant Code Example
The erroneous behavior is caused due to the server returning null
while the client forgets to add in a check for such a value. This noncompliant example shows how the check item != null
condition is missing from the if
condition in class Client
.
class Inventory { private static int[] item; public Inventory() { item = new int[20] } public static int[] getStock() { if(item.length == 0) return null; else return item; } } public class Client { public static void main(String[] args) { Inventory iv = new Inventory(); int[] item = Inventory.getStock(); if (Arrays.asList(item[1]).contains(1)) { System.out.println("Almost out of stock!" + item); } } }
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution eliminates the null
return and simply returns the item
array as is even if it is zero-length. The client can effectively handle this situation without exhibiting erroneous behavior. Be careful that the client does not try to access individual elements of a zero-length array such as item[1]
while following this recommendation.
class Inventory { private static int[] item; public Inventory() { item = new int[20]; item[2] = 1; //quantity of item 2 remaining is 1, almost out! } public static int[] getStock() { return item; } } public class Client { public static void main(String[] args) { Inventory iv = new Inventory(); int[] item = Inventory.getStock(); if (Arrays.asList(item[1]).contains(1)) { System.out.println("Almost out of stock!" + item); } } }
Risk Assessment
TODO
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET03-J |
?? |
?? |
?? |
P?? |
L?? |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
TODO