A switch
block comprises several case
labels and an optional but highly recommended default
label. By convention, statements that follow each case label end with a break
statement, responsible for transferring the control to the end of the switch
block. When omitted, the statements in the subsequent case
label are executed. Because the break
statement is optional, omitting it produces no compiler warnings. When this behavior is unintentional, it can cause unexpected control flow.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the case wherein the card
is 11, lacks a break
statement. As a result, execution continues with the statements for card = 12
.
int card = 11; switch (card) { /* ... */ case 11: System.out.println("Jack"); case 12: System.out.println("Queen"); break; case 13: System.out.println("King"); break; default: System.out.println("Invalid Card"); break; }
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution terminates each case (including the default
case) with a break
statement.
int card = 11; switch (card) { /* ... */ case 11: System.out.println("Jack"); break; case 12: System.out.println("Queen"); break; case 13: System.out.println("King"); break; default: System.out.println("Invalid Card"); break; }
Exceptions
MSC14-EX1: The break
statement at the end of the final case in a switch
statement may be omitted; by convention, this is the default
label. The break
statement serves to transfer control to the end of the switch
block; fall-through behavior also causes control to arrive at the end of the switch
block. Consequently, control transfers to the statements following the switch
block without regard to the presence or absence of the break
statement. Nevertheless, the final case in a switch
statement should end with a break
statement, in accordance with good programming style (see [[Rogue 2000]]).
MSC14-EX2: A break
statement may be omitted when multiple cases require execution of identical code. Such instances must be explicitly documented. For example:
int card = 11; int value; // Cases 11,12,13 fall through to the same case switch (card) { // MSC13-J:EX2: these three cases are treated identically case 11: case 12: case 13: value = 10; break; default: // Handle Error Condition }
MSC14-EX3: When a case ends with a return
or throw
statement, the break
statement may be omitted.
Risk Assessment
Failure to include break
statements can cause unexpected control flow.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSC14-J |
medium |
unlikely |
low |
P6 |
L2 |
Other Languages
This rule appears in the C Secure Coding Standard as MSC17-C. Finish every set of statements associated with a case label with a break statement.
This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as MSC18-CPP. Finish every set of statements associated with a case label with a break statement.
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Bibliography
[[JLS 2005]] Section 14.11 The switch Statement
[[Rogue 2000]] The Elements of Java Style, Rule 78.
MSC13-J. Do not modify the underlying collection when an iteration is in progress 49. Miscellaneous (MSC) MSC15-J. Use numeric comparison operators to terminate loops whose counter changes by more than one