Page History

Holding locks while performing time-consuming or blocking operations can severely degrade system performance and can result in starvation. Furthermore, deadlock  can result if interdependent threads block indefinitely. Blocking operations include network, file, and console I/O (for example, Console.readLine()) and object serialization. Deferring a thread indefinitely also constitutes a blocking operation. Consequently, programs must not perform blocking operations while holding a lock.

When the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) interacts with a file system that operates over an unreliable network, file I/O might incur a large performance penalty. In such cases, avoid file I/O over the network while holding a lock. File operations (such as logging) that could block while waiting for the output stream lock or for I/O to complete could be performed in a dedicated thread to speed up task processing. Logging requests can be added to a queue, assuming that the queue's put() operation incurs little overhead as compared to file I/O [Goetz 2006].

Noncompliant Code Example (Deferring a Thread)

This noncompliant code example defines a utility method that accepts a time argument:

public synchronized void doSomething(long time)
                         throws InterruptedException {
  // ...
  Thread.sleep(time);
}

Because the method is synchronized, when the thread is suspended, other threads cannot use the synchronized methods of the class. The current object's monitor continues to be held because the Thread.sleep() method lacks synchronization semantics.

Compliant Solution (Intrinsic Lock)

This compliant solution defines the doSomething() method with a timeout parameter rather than the time value. Using Object.wait() instead of Thread.sleep() allows setting a timeout period during which a notification may awaken the thread.

public synchronized void doSomething(long timeout)
                                     throws InterruptedException {
// ...
  while (<condition does not hold>) {
    wait(timeout); // Immediately releases the current monitor
  }
}

The current object's monitor is immediately released upon entering the wait state. When the timeout period elapses, the thread resumes execution after reacquiring the current object's monitor.

According to the Java API Class Object documentation [API 2014]

Note that the wait method, as it places the current thread into the wait set for this object, unlocks only this object; any other objects on which the current thread may be synchronized remain locked while the thread waits.

This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner of this object's monitor.

Programs must ensure that threads that hold locks on other objects release those locks appropriately before entering the wait state. Additional guidance on waiting and notification is available in THI03-J. Always invoke wait() and await() methods inside a loop and THI02-J. Notify all waiting threads rather than a single thread.

Noncompliant Code Example (Network I/O)

This noncompliant code example defines a sendPage() method that sends a Page object from a server to a client

Applying a lock over a call to a method performing network transactions or declaring such a method synchronized can be problematic. Depending on the speed and reliability of the connection, synchronization can stall the program indefinitely causing a huge performance hit. At other times, it can result in temporary or permanent deadlock.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example involves the method sendPage() that sends a Page object containing information being passed between a client and a server. The method is synchronized to protect access to the array pageBuff. Calling writeObject() within the synchronized sendPage can result in a deadlock condition in high latency networks or when network connections are inherently lossy pageBuff array when multiple threads request concurrent access.

// Class Page is defined separately. 
// It stores and returns the Page name via getName()

public final boolean SUCCESS = true;
public final boolean FAILURE = false;
Page[] pageBuff = new Page[MAX_PAGE_SIZE];

public synchronized boolean sendPage(Socket socket, String pageName) 
                                     throws IOException {
  // Get the output stream to write the Page to
  ObjectOutputStream out 
      = new ObjectOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());

  Page targetPage = null;

  // Find the Page requested by the client
  // (this operation requires synchronization)
  Page targetPage = null;
  for (Page p : pageBuff) {
    if (p.getName().compareTo(pageName) == 0) {
      targetPage = p;
    }
  }

  // Requested Page requested does not exist
  if (targetPage == null) {
    return FAILUREfalse;
  } 

  // Send the Page to the client
  // (does not require any synchronization)
  out.writeObject(targetPage);

  out.flush();
  out.close();
  return SUCCESStrue;
}

Calling writeObject() within the synchronized sendPage() method can result in delays and deadlock-like conditions in high-latency networks or when network connections are inherently lossy.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution entails separating separates the actions process into a sequence of steps:

1. Perform actions on data structures requiring synchronization.
2. Create copies of the objects

...

1. to be sent.
2. Perform network calls in a separate

...

1. unsynchronized method.

In this compliant solution, the unsynchronized sendPage() method calls the synchronized method getPage() is called from sendReply() to find the appropriate Page requested by the client from the array pageBuff of type Page. The method sendReply() in turn calls the unsynchronized method sendPage() method to retrieve the requested Page in the pageBuff array. After the Page is retrieved, sendPage() calls the unsynchronized deliverPage() method to deliver the Page to the client.

// No synchronization
public boolean sendReplysendPage(Socket socket, String pageName) { // No synchronization
  Page targetPage = getPage(pageName); 

  if (targetPage == null){
    return FAILUREfalse;
  }
  return sendPagedeliverPage(socket, targetPage);
}

// Requires synchronization
private synchronized Page getPage(String pageName) { // Requires synchronization
  Page targetPage = null;

  for (Page p : pageBuff) {
    if (p.getName().equals(pageName)) {
      targetPage = p;
    }
  }
  return targetPage;
}

// Return false if an error occurs, true if successful
public boolean sendPagedeliverPage(Socket socket, Page page) {
  ObjectOutputStream out = null;
  boolean result = true;
  try {
    // Get the output stream to write the Page to
    ObjectOutputStream out = new ObjectOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());

    // Send the Pagepage to the client
    out.writeObject(page);out.flush();

  } catch (IOException io) {
    result // If recovery is not possible return FAILURE
    return FAILURE;    
  } finally {
= false;
  } finally {
    if (out != null) {
      try {
        out.flushclose();
    out.close();  } catch (IOException e) {
        result = false;
      }
    }
  }
  return SUCCESSresult;
}

Risk Assessment

Exceptions

LCK09-J-EX0: Classes that provide an appropriate termination mechanism to callers are permitted to violate this rule (see THI04-J. Ensure that threads performing blocking operations can be terminated).

LCK09-J-EX1: Methods that require multiple locks may hold several locks while waiting for the remaining locks to become available. This constitutes a valid exception, although the programmer must follow other applicable rules, especially LCK07-J. Avoid deadlock by requesting and releasing locks in the same order to avoid deadlock .

Risk Assessment

Blocking or lengthy operations performed within synchronized regions could result in a deadlocked or unresponsive systemIf synchronized methods and statements contain network transactional logic, temporary or permanent deadlocks may result.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

\[[Grosso 01|AA. Java References#Grosso 01]\] [Chapter 10: Serialization|http://oreilly.com/catalog/javarmi/chapter/ch10.html]
\[[JLS 05|AA. Java References#JLS 05]\] [Chapter 17, Threads and Locks|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html]
\[[Rotem 08|AA. Java References#Rotem 08]\] [Falacies of Distributed Computing Explained|http://www.rgoarchitects.com/Files/fallacies.pdf]

Automated Detection

Some static analysis tools are capable of detecting violations of this rule.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedCON19-J. Use notifyAll() instead of notify() to resume waiting threads      11. Concurrency (CON)      CON21-J. Facilitate thread reuse by using Thread Pools